2002 Tuscans, do many need rebuilds ?
2002 Tuscans, do many need rebuilds ?
Author
Discussion

V8 Devil

Original Poster:

3,556 posts

257 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
Found a cracking looking 2002 Tuscan S :

http://users.autoexposure.co.uk/class

Did the S spec cars and or regular Tuscans of this age need rebuilds? This one has done 21000 miles, i am aware that many others of 2000-2001 would be possibly looking at a rebuild by now.

Cheers,

Mike.

UpTheIron

4,057 posts

292 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
Pretty much just as likely to require a rebuild as a 2000/2001 car IMHO.

eldudereno

997 posts

251 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
Could always pay to get the engine checked out before you purchase. Do you need to buy from a garage?

kippax

2,792 posts

273 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
I'm over 21k miles with no sign of a rebuild (touches wooden floor) Just back from service where it was commented that it was one of the quietest speed 6 engines heard with no signs of wear internally. Mine is also a 2002 4lt model.

H

V8 Devil

Original Poster:

3,556 posts

257 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
I don't necessarily need to buy from a garage but i need to part ex the Chimaera. My Chimaera is up for sale but nothing as yet ! Why do you ask? Any ideas, good deals that you can suggest. Thanks, Mike.

yzf1070

814 posts

255 months

Saturday 6th January 2007
quotequote all
My 2003 S needed a rebuild after only 7200 miles, but it was not valve wear related, rather the cam lobes and finger followers were worn out. The engine had also sufferred detonation and a piston crown was damaged as a result, plus the valve seats were beginning to show signs of errosion.
Once the engine was opened up and inspected the issues escalated to a weak crankshaft (not case hardned), poorly fabricated rods and ill fitting main bearing caps.

My advice would be to seriously consider setting aside a 5K slush fund to cover a rebuild cost. Or get one that has the later factory engine upgrades, i.e valves, guides, cams, rods and improved head gasket. However the cranks are still cast and the main caps are likely to be the same old crap.

V8 Devil

Original Poster:

3,556 posts

257 months

Saturday 6th January 2007
quotequote all
Thanks, I will keep looking !!

b2tus

952 posts

283 months

Sunday 7th January 2007
quotequote all
Same as Kippax. 2002 Tuscan 4.0 with 21K miles and no problems. Virtually no oil consumption to speak of either.
There are good ones out there....keep looking and try to speak/meet previous owner/s. Often a good pointer to their earlier life.

donaldhunter

121 posts

288 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
I also have a 2002 (52 plate) Tuscan 4.0. It has done ~25,000 miles and is going fine.

Cheers,
Donald.

kippax

2,792 posts

273 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
Seems to be a pattern of 4.0lt engines ok ?? What about the 3.6 ??

H

pete

1,628 posts

308 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
My 2003 3.6 (it's newer, I know) has over 29,000 miles on the clock and is in fine fettle. No rebuild, and only very minor valve clearance adjustments needed at the last service a few hundred miles ago.

There's anecdotal evidence that 3.6s are more reliable than 4.0s, but nothing concrete; plenty of claims of each one being either reliable or unreliable, depending who you speak to.

Pete

H10TVR

436 posts

235 months

Sunday 14th January 2007
quotequote all
My 2002, has just done 17,000 miles without a problem, on the last service inspection in great condition showing no wear and tear,It is early days I know but so far so good (touching wood).
When I bought the car I bought form TVR dealer with an extended ( TVR asscoiated but non-factory) warranty and still have 18 months left on this and it has a 5k per claim limit.

My advice by with a warranty (if you can get it, I think mine was about £1500 for three years), warm your enging oil up to 75- 80 before "driving with any revs),use it regularily. Treat it with respect.

Having said all of that I absolutely love my car, eevery time I get in it I have a big smile on my face.

big lee

34 posts

236 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
do they need rebuild every 20k or if you've have one, then it is ok?

s6 sfx

595 posts

250 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
It depends.

Replace like parts with like then expect to do it again after 20k.

Go to a rebuilder who'll address the issues, and fit superior quality components then you should be fixed for good.

You'll get what you pay for in terms of rebuilds, so decide how long you want the car for before you invest in costly work.
Al.

Mustang Baz

1,652 posts

258 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
pete said:
My 2003 3.6 (it's newer, I know) has over 29,000 miles on the clock and is in fine fettle. No rebuild, and only very minor valve clearance adjustments needed at the last service a few hundred miles ago.

There's anecdotal evidence that 3.6s are more reliable than 4.0s, but nothing concrete; plenty of claims of each one being either reliable or unreliable, depending who you speak to.



As Pete says, nothing concrete - I have a 2003 3.6, but it was one of the first to go in the South of England regrettably at 10,750 miles (Aug 05). That was after only one former PH-er owner, always warmed up and cared for/serviced and having gone through a detailed check and drive by Rob Ingleby. Sometimes, you just have to run the risk - managed of course, via a warranty...

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

284 months

Thursday 5th April 2007
quotequote all
I thought Cerbera,s were troublesome enough,seems like it really is a mine field in owning a Tuscan.Thing is ive loved the look of them since i first saw one.And to think i want to own one along side the Cerb.I must besilly

big lee

34 posts

236 months

Friday 6th April 2007
quotequote all
how can you tell if you may ned one soon?

are there signs?

fimbo

313 posts

252 months

Friday 6th April 2007
quotequote all
I pondered about getting a Tuscan for ages - read all the threads and still took the plunge. The more sp6 owners I've met the more I've come to realise that not every engine is doomed to fail - in fact, anecdotally, I've met considerably more people who have had no engine rebuilds with 20k+ mileage than those that have. Mine is a 3.6 and has done 22.5k with no problems. I realise it may not be an entirely accurate measure, but just check out the Tuscans for sale on autotrader to see (as I did prior to buying mine many months ago) just how many high mileage (i.e. 30k+) Tuscans there are out there without rebuilds.

fimbo

313 posts

252 months

Friday 6th April 2007
quotequote all
...and before someone flames me, I don't think 30k is "high" mileage hehe

J_S_G

6,177 posts

274 months

Friday 6th April 2007
quotequote all
By part way through 2002 a lot of the follower problems were resolved. If it's up to that mileage, could well avoid that. There's a not insignificant possibility it will have the valve guides burn out, though...

- Either accept that you might need a shiny new ultra-swish engine soon & stick some money in the bank OR
- See if you can get a warranty that'll cover for a rebuild OR
- Decide whether you're a gambling man OR
- Buy a pink Boxster

I'd go for options 1 or 2.