Rover has stopped production!
Rover has stopped production!
Author
Discussion

thanuk

Original Poster:

686 posts

285 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4420507.stm

Parts suppliers won't send any more bits

hornet

6,333 posts

272 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Story breaking on BBC News that the receivers have been called in. Looks bleak.


ledfoot

777 posts

274 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
hornet said:
Story breaking on BBC News that the receivers have been called in. Looks bleak.



I have no sympathy at all for MG Rover.

The cars are rubbish

Should have closed Longbridge down last time they were in trouble.

ledfoot

777 posts

274 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
hornet said:
Story breaking on BBC News that the receivers have been called in. Looks bleak.



The government have made a big mistake in their announcement that the receivers have been called in

This must be the end now for both MG Rover and the Government

thanuk

Original Poster:

686 posts

285 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
ledfoot said:


I have no sympathy at all for MG Rover.

The cars are rubbish


No, but there are nearly 7000 people going to lose their jobs at Longbridge so you have to feel sympathy for them.

Fire99

9,863 posts

251 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
ledfoot said:

hornet said:
Story breaking on BBC News that the receivers have been called in. Looks bleak.




I have no sympathy at all for MG Rover.

The cars are rubbish

Should have closed Longbridge down last time they were in trouble.


The Rover models are no more rubbish than about 75% of mass market models..

And some of the MG models are far better than many MGR 'knockers' are aware of..

Goes to show how unpatriotic our country has become and im sure the 18,000 odd people who stand to lose their jobs will be equally impressed!!

Remember longbridge has been making cars for 101 years!! Its part of the English Heritage and deserves a degree of faith... (considering the many millions that are wasted on hair-brain schemes.. like big millenium tents and changing a lane of the M4 into a Bus and politican lane!!!)

jl34

552 posts

259 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
have you morons got any idea what this means for not just 6000 at longbridge, but perhaps 15,000 others in supply industries?

"the cars are rubbish" well thanks for that wonderful brainless comment, they may not be your taste but they are to some others. The downfall of the british motor industry and the manufacturing it supports benefits no one

but hey lets make some more cheap comments about Rover for fun eh. BMW destroyed the company and took its best assets, but there a cool company arent they!?

RickH

1,703 posts

270 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Looks like the government have moved, only an inch but at least its something:

www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=8123819

Not sure her visit to Longbridge would be a good decision if the government didn't do something. Still, how far is £40m going to travel?

Rick

Piccy mate

541 posts

259 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Classic Labour U-turn!
Someone must have been watching Newsnight where they commented on the fact that 15,000 odd West midlanders might now decide not to vote labour.
Piccy mate

Yugguy

10,728 posts

257 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
20,000 jobs will be lost.

The cars are not rubbish, as anyone who has driven a ZS180 will tell you. If MG could make a cracking drivers car out of an old 400/Honda, I would have loved to have seen what they could have done with some real development money.

I see nothing to celebrate about the fact we will no longer have any mainstream car industry in this country, while foreign manufacturers grow rich trading on filched Britishness.

Mudflap

36 posts

253 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Another large part of our british heritage lost forever. Pity BLiar and his mob cant do something to help them out. Thats is a lot of people who have a very worrying future in front of them.
I just cant see how the Rover/MG cars can be called rubbish. Just my view and no I do not drive a Rover.

Flat in Fifth

47,762 posts

273 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Thing that annoyed me was the comment from an Inst of Directors bod.

Initially talked sense that any solution must be workable in the long term as we don't want to be back here in 1, 3 , 5 years.

Then he said the site would make an ideal place for another Merry Hill style shopping centre and cited that now 3x more people worked on that site than at the previous engineering employers.

They are all part time minimum wage (or near) jobs based on trading economy, rather than valued added work.

the ringmeister

279 posts

260 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
A very sad day for the british motor industry.

Being involved in the commerial property sector, i whitness how the government hands out £million upon million to regeneration schemes in the hope of creating an insignificant number of new jobs. Common scence would suggest investing in existing sectors to maintain existing jobs would be the way forward.

This is a big blow for Britain, our farming and rural economy is on its knees, large scale manufacturing looks to all but vanish , another step closer to Tony's vision of a country made up of call centres and drive thru burger joints.

Rule Britania!!!!!!!

Digga

45,792 posts

305 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
the ringmeister said:
Being involved in the commerial property sector, i whitness how the government hands out £million upon million to regeneration schemes in the hope of creating an insignificant number of new jobs. Common scence would suggest investing in existing sectors to maintain existing jobs would be the way forward.Rule Britania!!!!!!!


It would make even more sense to do away with handouts, cut red tape and taxes, and the multi-billion-pounds worth of civil servants we need to administer them, and let business get on with trying to survive in the global market place.

Insteadb though, inevetably whoever wins the next election will just p**s about re-arranging the deck chairs whilst the Titanic (UK) is steaming merrily towards the icberg that is economic disaster.

At one time, the sun never set on the British empire - now we're not far of permanent darkness!

kevinday

13,639 posts

302 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Spot on Digga.

daydreamer

1,409 posts

279 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Trying to run an engineering company in the present climate, this obviously worries me.

It does however make me think that BMW was right to have a go at the MG Rover board about multi-million bonusses, when the company has obviously heading this way for a while.

Lots of things that could have been done in hidsight, but not sure where we go from here. I wouldn't be opposed to a government rescue, BUT, it would have to be on the proviso that the rescuer had power to manage, rather than pander to all those with vested interests - otherwise it just goes like the railways, with every extra pound being hoovered up by the employees in fantastic pay deals, and contractors in lucrative partnership arrangements.

As has been said above, a true level playingfield, where correct market rates are calculated would be great. Just can't see it happening somehow

jacko lah

3,297 posts

271 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
jl34 said:
have you morons got any idea what this means for not just 6000 at longbridge, but perhaps 15,000 others in supply industries?

"the cars are rubbish" well thanks for that wonderful brainless comment, they may not be your taste but they are to some others. The downfall of the british motor industry and the manufacturing it supports benefits no one

but hey lets make some more cheap comments about Rover for fun eh. BMW destroyed the company and took its best assets, but there a cool company arent they!?


Indeed - But 60 million car capacity and 40 million sales for a world car industry means that something has to give. Having dealt with Rover (when owned by BMW) when I was working for LUCAS (RIP) I really feel for those that are not to blame.

Not driven a Rover Car, since I owned a 85 METRO Turbo in the early 90's. and I now drive an 85 vauxhall so am not in a position to comment on product. My 65 year old auntie recently bought a CITY rover and says it's a FINE car. The 25 was too BIG apparently.



Digga

45,792 posts

305 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
jacko lah said:
Not driven a Rover Car, since I owned a 85 METRO Turbo in the early 90's. and I now drive an 85 vauxhall so am not in a position to comment on product. My 65 year old auntie recently bought a CITY rover and says it's a FINE car. The 25 was too BIG apparently.


What is it with olds and small cars? Is there some sort of size perception shift as you hit pensionable age?

My great uncle was a classic example. You'd think a Lt. Colonel, who was mentioned in despatches at Dunkirk, might be pompous and patriotic. At the very least, with a huge girth and those old man, high-waist strides (where do they buy them?!) practicality might dictate a roomier motor.

But not a bit of it, he happily motored his later years away in a series of Nissan Micras.

Yugguy

10,728 posts

257 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Oh god, the last thing we need is another bl00dy shopping centre and 20000 McJobs.

"It's ok Bill, you might be a highly skilled car designer but I'm sure we can get you in at World Of Shoes."

>> Edited by Yugguy on Friday 8th April 16:16

simond001

4,519 posts

299 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
The government may have financial aid, but my understanding is that it's directed at the supply companies not Rover.

A sad day if we lose Rover, but with an election next month I see a little spin involved before that happens!