AA Parts and labour - is it worth it?
AA Parts and labour - is it worth it?
Author
Discussion

chrissy g

Original Poster:

193 posts

287 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Don't want to tempt fate, but I'd be interested in how many cerb owners have signed up for this? For £52 it does sound too good to be true....any experiences good or bad?

Chris

julesby

79 posts

283 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
havent heard of this one, can you tell me more?

jack_ratt

57 posts

269 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Mine is in at moment with a clutch problem (fingers), I am expecting AA to foot £500 towards cost..If this is so well worth £52 of anybodies money. Upto 3 claims per year with a ceiling of £500 per claim.

julesby

79 posts

283 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
just read terms and cond of RAC parts and labour and they exclude TVR, does the AA accept TVR if so seems to be a good deal

jack_ratt

57 posts

269 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Parts and labour warranty is an extension from breakdown cover ..IIRC minimum cover @ £41, so all in for £93. A good deal especially with cost of spare parts, one claim per year and your quids in.
Martin

kojak69

4,547 posts

275 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Yes. Mine was the same scenario as Jack Ratt, so yes it is worth it. They paid more towards my clutch, than warranty holdings, so for £52, i'd pay it. They will only cover you though if they've been out to the car on a breakdown, and they cant repair it.

sportie

561 posts

273 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
I have it but have not yet had to use it, but for £52 it's got to be worth it

andy4200

5,103 posts

295 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Yep

Took it out recently as an extension to my cover, 26 quid for 6 months. Wish I new about it when I took out the cover, it would have paid for my slave cylinder.

Andy

joospeed

4,473 posts

300 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
It's a bargain .. get it now before they wise up and exclude TVrs from the scheme .. best 52 quid you'll spend

Alistair H.

1,173 posts

293 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
Joo,

you have just reminded me. - Rung the AA. now on cover.

bigbazza

2,135 posts

269 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
I got the cover not had to use it yet as the only problem I keep having is starter motor which is on a rolling warranty from the factory....for £52 its certainly worth the risk, I can't imagine the AA being as difficult as WH to deal with!!

trooper1212

9,457 posts

274 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
I've upgraded mine. Just as an insurance against anything going wrong in the future. Sod's law and all that

GCerbera

5,161 posts

273 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
Well here is a question.

Say you have a problem, the AA come out and have to
flatbed it away.

You have a WHA policy, will that cover you for more,
less or the same items of repair?

I know the WHA has a much higher claim threshold than
the £500 for the AA.

I guess my question is, is there any advantage in having both?

joospeed

4,473 posts

300 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
er, you might like to keep that quiet ...

chrissy g

Original Poster:

193 posts

287 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
So a resounding yes its worth it! Carplan wanted about £400-500 pounds in my case. There is something in the Terms and conditions about having other warranties, so personally I'd avoid having 2 otherwise you may find you not covered at all (don't know how they'd find out.... )

GCerbera

5,161 posts

273 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
GCerbera said:
I guess my question is, is there any advantage in having both?
Well to answer my own hypothetical question, it has been pointed
out to me ( as Chrissy g also mentioned ) there is a
clause about "parts not covered under any other warranty"

So stick with one or the other.

ropey

370 posts

274 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
i have it but as yet have never needed it (sods law!). I tried to get them to pay for a new starter motor on the Chim when it was with David Batty but it had to break down and then they had to be called out.

Neadless to say, the starter motor is only a temporary issue, so how they're going to agree it's broken is beyond me....?!

Waiting for weather to get a bit warmer to see if it happens again.

Read in above posts about people using it to go towards a clutch - i didn't think the Parts and Labour covered wear and tear. Or is the clutch issue not wear and tear?

kojak69

4,547 posts

275 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
The fingers broke on the clutch, so it wasn't wear and tear.

seasider

12,728 posts

271 months

Tuesday 10th February 2004
quotequote all
joospeed said:
It's a bargain .. get it now before they wise up and exclude TVrs from the scheme .. best 52 quid you'll spend


Just signed up for £26 as existing AA cover is till june, still get 3 goes @ £500 in that time..Marvellous i think and i'll happily pay £1 a week especially as it probably means nothing will go bang now!!!

The vehicle must be under 10yrs old/100,000 miles when you "first sign up" but then no age/mileage restrictions, apart from proof of yearly service! I asked if i did my own maintenance would reciepts for service parts would be accepted... yes was the answer

Jool's no i haven't put them on yet, i will get around to it soon...knowing my luck a shock/spring will go before i put them on as i have the new ones in garage ready to fit. Although at least i'd get them fitted for nothing