new xkr fancy your chances ?
Discussion
Yeah I know about the cost differential I was just interested in the absoluet performance difference (if any) i.e. 2 cars weighing about the same with similar or identical power/torque figs in performance stakes.
Reason is I tried the 50 - 75 sprint in mine....2.7 seconds is bloody fast not sure I could match it and I have well over 420hp and a 3.9 diff!!
Maybe that is the benefit of autos with accurately mapped gears/changes a al AMG's.....
Going to do some proper timed runs. Power Figs are all fair and well but what does that mean in real performance terms?
Timing gear required....
Reason is I tried the 50 - 75 sprint in mine....2.7 seconds is bloody fast not sure I could match it and I have well over 420hp and a 3.9 diff!!
Maybe that is the benefit of autos with accurately mapped gears/changes a al AMG's.....
Going to do some proper timed runs. Power Figs are all fair and well but what does that mean in real performance terms?
Timing gear required....
One thing I'll say in favour of the XK - especially after my test drive on Sunday - is that it holds the road far better than the Monaro. 20k extra is probably well invested in their CATS system for keeping tyres glued to the road, plus the fact that 285/30/20 tyres probably grip an awful piece better than the thin Monaro rubbers!
Forum | HSV & Monaro | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




sorry 
