IS250. £1000
Author
Discussion

Heaveho

Original Poster:

6,915 posts

199 months

Tuesday 24th March
quotequote all
I'm in the ridiculous situation where I've been offered a 100k mile Lexus IS250 for a grand, but it's a pointless purchase because it's a 56 plate and the tax is £750 a year. The car isn't faultless, it has brake judder, I suspect it has a seized caliper, it needs a rear wheel balance, and the paint is far from perfect, but the fundamentals of the thing are sound, and I'd buy it in a heartbeat at that price normally. I could have it virtually mechanically and aesthetically mint for a few hundred quid.

This is the position you find yourself in when a Govt has not the vaguest idea of the damage it's doing with naive and ill informed attempts to apply tax to perfectly serviceable vehicles with little knowledge of the subject matter at hand. This is a car that is going to end up in a breakers yard for no good reason because an empty suit has reacted in kneejerk fashion to provide an answer to a question no-one has asked. The same car on a 2005 plate is £430 or so to tax.

What a waste of a quality vehicle.

quigonjay

1,544 posts

246 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
Such a shame so many older but very usable vehicles will end up the same way, stealth scrapage scheme, ridiculous really isn't it, so much C02 saved by not buying a new vehicle yet they tax you out of existence

soad

34,399 posts

201 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
Must be a manual, as autos usually cheaper to tax?

Some say: 57 plate-onwards are able to run on E10.

Heaveho

Original Poster:

6,915 posts

199 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
soad said:
Must be a manual, as autos usually cheaper to tax?

Some say: 57 plate-onwards are able to run on E10.
Auto.

Edited to add, after another look, you might be right. I need to get the reg, but I might have been a bit premature about the tax band. Thanks for the heads up.

Edited by Heaveho on Wednesday 25th March 09:24

RSTurboPaul

12,850 posts

283 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
Only £2.05 a day at £750.

eth2190

232 posts

26 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
I ran one for a bit and have a soft spot for them, however there simply isn't much demand for a compact saloon that gets low 30s mpg and is embarrassed in the traffic light GP by an average fiesta.

The mechanicals will go on forever but that isn't as important to the UK buyer. It seems to be a car more valued in the US where they want a car to do mega miles with just regular oil changes.

Edited by eth2190 on Wednesday 25th March 09:53

Heaveho

Original Poster:

6,915 posts

199 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Only £2.05 a day at £750.
I personally don't mind, but when I want it gone, most people will.

It might be ok, as another poster pointed out, it may well be taxed at the lower rate, being an auto.

Dave.

7,823 posts

278 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Only £2.05 a day at £750.
Which is fine if it's your only car, if it's just a weekend/track toy that does naff all miles, it's a bit of a piss take.

Heaveho

Original Poster:

6,915 posts

199 months

Wednesday 25th March
quotequote all
Dave. said:
RSTurboPaul said:
Only £2.05 a day at £750.
Which is fine if it's your only car, if it's just a weekend/track toy that does naff all miles, it's a bit of a piss take.
It's hard to justify £735 tax a year on a £1000 car.

MattsCar

2,160 posts

130 months

Saturday 18th April
quotequote all
I really liked mine.

Built like a tank.

I also thought that it was pretty quick for a heavy car. Only 200bhp but the auto box was pretty swift.

My average MPG was 26.9mpg with an equal split of A road/town driving. I remember that figure as I swapped it for a Jag XK which got 22ish to the gallon and made me realise that the increase in performance was well worth losing 4mpg for. Lol.