New ACT MS13 manifolds .
New ACT MS13 manifolds .
Author
Discussion

SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

252 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
My car made 357hp and about the same torque (just
under 360 anyway)

Dyno read out to come ..music

phazed

22,430 posts

225 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
What was it before Daz?

Matthew Poxon

5,329 posts

194 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
That is a great result Daz, well done. Looking forward to seeing the graph and of course the compulsory picture of your engine bay with the new shiny pipework.

LongBaz

2,095 posts

238 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
phazed said:
What was it before Daz?
At a guess 345

phazed

22,430 posts

225 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
I got another 12+ with mine iirc.

JamsD

121 posts

260 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Do they have a boss for a wideband fitted

Classic Chim

12,424 posts

170 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
I’m fairly sure you can ask to have one welded in before purchase but you’ll need to check.

phazed

22,430 posts

225 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Any boss you like! Just specify.

N7GTX

8,254 posts

164 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Here's a pic of the cat equipped manifolds (MS14) showing the lambda sensors

https://www.actproducts.co.uk/product/ms14-griffit...

SILICONEKID 357HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

252 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all




Matthew Poxon

5,329 posts

194 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Interesting you have gained a fair bit of top end horsepower but lost a bit of mid range torque. In theory the longer primaries on those manifolds should result in more torque.

Almost 360BHP out of a 5 litre is very impressive.

What cam do you have?

phazed

22,430 posts

225 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
Mine did exactly the same.

Gained horsepower and spread the hp out longer.
Increased the torque slightly further up the rev range and lost a little lower down.

coffee

900T-R

20,406 posts

278 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
phazed said:
Mine did exactly the same.

Gained horsepower and spread the hp out longer.
Increased the torque slightly further up the rev range and lost a little lower down.

coffee
All desirable traits on a 5L thumbup

Quite unexpected, as the primaries are longer and a tiny bit smaller diameter (1 5/8" rather than 1 3/4" apparently, this would only become a restriction at around 400 bhp I've been told, so spot on for an RV8) - this leads me to believe these represent a skilful balance based on a bit of dyno development/real world data.

Edited by 900T-R on Friday 7th September 15:31

TwinKam

3,448 posts

116 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
900T-R said:
phazed said:
Mine did exactly the same.

Gained horsepower and spread the hp out longer.
Increased the torque slightly further up the rev range and lost a little lower down.

coffee
All desirable traits on a 5L thumbup

Quite unexpected, as the primaries are longer and a tiny bit smaller diameter (1 5/8" rather than 1 3/8" apparently, this would only become a restriction at around 400 bhp I've been told, so spot on for an RV8) - this leads me to believe these represent a skilful balance based on a bit of dyno development/real world data.
Did you mean 1 5/16"...?

Podie

46,647 posts

296 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
How do these differ to Clive F's offering?

Price wise, they ain't cheap...

QBee

22,041 posts

165 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
Daz won’t be bothered about price......he’s a plumber. getmecoat

Classic Chim

12,424 posts

170 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
Podie said:
How do these differ to Clive F's offering?

Price wise, they ain't cheap...
Probably not by much unless it’s the equal length ones which sort of look cheap when you look at the detail involved.
The numbers don’t change much but the easier breathing must be good for the engine overall I’d have guessed.
If I could afford some I’d have them purely from a vanity perspective which is why Daz has em I reckon biggrin

ETA Daz is after faster times for the 1/4 mile I believe so worth it if he gets what he wants. I would too hehe

Edited by Classic Chim on Friday 7th September 13:33

Podie

46,647 posts

296 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
QBee said:
Daz won’t be bothered about price......he’s a plumber. getmecoat
rofl

900T-R

20,406 posts

278 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
TwinKam said:
Did you mean 1 5/16"...?
Sorry, I meant 1 3/4" for the OE ones. Amended my original post now smile

SILICONEKID 357HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

252 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
I've not heard it yet but loosing the bucket Y piece gets rid of the clatter noise around the engine bay and gives a nicer sound out the back .

I have money coming back for the Y piece and manifolds .looking

I don't have any money because accountants are very expensive Anthony 😋



Edited by SILICONEKID 357HP on Friday 7th September 18:46