Thinking of buying an XF 5.0 v8 (not xfr). Am I mad?
Thinking of buying an XF 5.0 v8 (not xfr). Am I mad?
Author
Discussion

Chutney

Original Poster:

34 posts

203 months

Saturday 16th June 2012
quotequote all
Don't do enough miles to buy a diesel.

Need to have kids seat in the back, so not an XK

Don't want the hard ride, or extra expense, of the XFR.

So, its got to be a normally aspitated 5.0 V8 (Portfolio). Would be lovely. MPG doesnt worry me too much on 5k miles a year. Just hope it doesnt end up being worthless in 3 years time.

What do you all think?

V88Dicky

7,363 posts

209 months

Saturday 16th June 2012
quotequote all
It's exactly the car that my wife has in mind for next year, she does around 8K a year and it would be a worthy replacement for her 2007 S-type V8, except the 5.0 has an extra 85hp and is more efficient. 1- 2 year old ones seem to be going for £25-£28K, very good value.

What's not to like?

smile

TheD

3,142 posts

225 months

Saturday 16th June 2012
quotequote all
Lovely lovely car/ I would say that it is a great purchase. I'm thinking about it myself.

Rythmic slapping

76 posts

175 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
You maybe surprised by the ride of the XFR. With the adaptive dynamics it really is superb compared to the M5.

It terms of price £28k would get you in an XFR with many options. The standard XFR is specked to the portfolio standard, and many have additional options.

The XFR will also hold its value better.

It's worthing trying them both. Especially as they are in a similar price bracket.

peter450

1,650 posts

259 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
I tend to agree with the guy above, the N/A V8 is in that uncomfortable middle ground of not being the choice of those wanting performance, and not being the choice of those wanting better running costs and fuel consumption

Triple7

4,015 posts

263 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
Not sure on your budget, but I too would go for an XFR, there is not point in buying an XF with a normal V8 unless it's extremely cheap. As has been alluded to, the spec on the XFR is much higher and the most important thing is the regular XF seats are awful, the 'R sports seats are superb and make buying an XFR over an XF the way to go.

The economy will be the same, depreciation on a similar priced XFR will be much better than a n/a V8 XF, plus it is one heck of an awesome car.


Chutney

Original Poster:

34 posts

203 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
Triple7 said:
Not sure on your budget, but I too would go for an XFR, there is not point in buying an XF with a normal V8 unless it's extremely cheap. ........
Thanks all - I will try a XFR, but its about £41k for a one year old XFR and only £29k for a one year old plain v8. So quite a difference between the two.

Triple7

4,015 posts

263 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
Are you looking at the facelift models? If not go for a 2-3yr old car.

Edited by Triple7 on Sunday 17th June 19:46

Rythmic slapping

76 posts

175 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
No big differences between the facelifted XFR. Go for a 2 to 3year old, the jag network has many with less than 30k miles and more options than you can imagine.

£28k all day long for a approved jaguar used XFR portfolio spec. With 3 or 4 good options on top.

Try xfforums.co.uk for some more advice.

Andy


Rythmic slapping

76 posts

175 months

Sunday 17th June 2012
quotequote all
Try this video on YouTube it made my mind up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuL3q39ZHNo&fea...