XF 3.0 Supercharged 2014
XF 3.0 Supercharged 2014
Author
Discussion

Ed Moses

Original Poster:

692 posts

143 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
Anybody got any experience with this model of car and engine as they seem quite rare?
I fancy a petrol supercharged Jag, but not the big V8.

Ed

fatboy b

9,662 posts

239 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
Yes they are rare. Do you really want the expense of a supercharged Jag XF without the V8 soundtrack? There's really not much in it with the mpg.

Go and test drive both, and come back and say the R wasn't the better car biggrin

Edited by fatboy b on Saturday 29th October 16:46

craigjm

20,469 posts

223 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
There is a reason they are quite rare. They are not as fast as the v8 supercharge but are not much more economical and they are more expensive to run than the 3.0 diesel. Engine was really not designed for UK in that installation

philmots

4,660 posts

283 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
I'd try one, they were for sale at the time most people were brainwashed into buying diesels.

It may not be as quick as the V8 Supercharged but it will be a lot better on fuel, it may not be as good on fuel as the diesel but it's up 65hp on the fastest and will sound a lot sweeter, and you won't kill it on short journeys.

The Leaper

5,498 posts

229 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
Could try the XF 5.0 V8 n/a.

R.

fatboy b

9,662 posts

239 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
philmots said:
I'd try one, they were for sale at the time most people were brainwashed into buying diesels.

It may not be as quick as the V8 Supercharged but it will be a lot better on fuel, it may not be as good on fuel as the diesel but it's up 65hp on the fastest and will sound a lot sweeter, and you won't kill it on short journeys.
Not a lot better on fuel than the R. And no quicker then the diesel really.

philmots

4,660 posts

283 months

Saturday 29th October 2016
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
philmots said:
I'd try one, they were for sale at the time most people were brainwashed into buying diesels.

It may not be as quick as the V8 Supercharged but it will be a lot better on fuel, it may not be as good on fuel as the diesel but it's up 65hp on the fastest and will sound a lot sweeter, and you won't kill it on short journeys.
Not a lot better on fuel than the R. And no quicker then the diesel really.
It must average mid/high 20's, which would put it about half way between the XFR and the diesel. A worthwhile difference.

But in fairness, that 65hp is practicality 25% more, that will make quite a difference.

V88Dicky

7,362 posts

206 months

Sunday 30th October 2016
quotequote all
Just look at it as a replacement for the 5.0 n/a. Almost as fast, slightly better on fuel, and cheaper to tax. smile

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

163 months

Monday 31st October 2016
quotequote all
philmots said:
fatboy b said:
philmots said:
I'd try one, they were for sale at the time most people were brainwashed into buying diesels.

It may not be as quick as the V8 Supercharged but it will be a lot better on fuel, it may not be as good on fuel as the diesel but it's up 65hp on the fastest and will sound a lot sweeter, and you won't kill it on short journeys.
Not a lot better on fuel than the R. And no quicker then the diesel really.
It must average mid/high 20's, which would put it about half way between the XFR and the diesel. A worthwhile difference.

But in fairness, that 65hp is practicality 25% more, that will make quite a difference.
I am averaging mid-20s with my R-S that isn't driven particularly economically. That's not to say the 3.0S/C wouldn't be a nice package, but I'd only expect a marginal improvement in fuel consumption, and in city traffic at that.

Ed Moses

Original Poster:

692 posts

143 months

Friday 4th November 2016
quotequote all
Well I took one out for a drive today and really enjoyed it, coming from a Merc E350. The Jag wafts nicely, but seems to be able to make progress with little effort. We have put down a deposit and need to sort out the paperwork.

Thank you for your inputs.

Ed

fatboy b

9,662 posts

239 months

Friday 4th November 2016
quotequote all
Ed Moses said:
Well I took one out for a drive today and really enjoyed it, coming from a Merc E350. The Jag wafts nicely, but seems to be able to make progress with little effort. We have put down a deposit and need to sort out the paperwork.

Thank you for your inputs.

Ed
Hope you enjoy it. Engine aside, the XF is a country mile ahead of the Germans. I'm loving my RS, and loved the two XFSs.

www.jaginfo.org has some great people on, and good advice for diy.

Ed Moses

Original Poster:

692 posts

143 months

Saturday 12th November 2016
quotequote all
Picked up the car this afternoon. It was a bit damp to push, but it is a lovely place to be. I hope it is dry tomorrow and we can go for a quicker drive. The ride quality is much nicer than the E Class Merc was.

Ed

Simpo Two

91,305 posts

288 months

Saturday 12th November 2016
quotequote all
Ed Moses said:
The Jag wafts nicely
If you're ever in north Essex please drop me a line; I need to see this. I can't believe an XF 'wafts'!

fatboy b

9,662 posts

239 months

Saturday 12th November 2016
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Ed Moses said:
The Jag wafts nicely
If you're ever in north Essex please drop me a line; I need to see this. I can't believe an XF 'wafts'!
Even my XFR-S wafts now and again biggrin

fatboy b

9,662 posts

239 months

Saturday 12th November 2016
quotequote all
Ed Moses said:
Picked up the car this afternoon. It was a bit damp to push, but it is a lovely place to be. I hope it is dry tomorrow and we can go for a quicker drive. The ride quality is much nicer than the E Class Merc was.

Ed
Try another 200 bhp in this weather! Glad you're enjoying it.