MS AntiSpyware
Author
Discussion

agent006

Original Poster:

12,058 posts

295 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
Anybody use this extensively in a corporate environment? It's just been rebranded as Windows Defender, and whilst it's still a beta, i'm pondering putting it on our build images.
Just wondering if anyone's got any input, having used it in a similar environment?

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

279 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
Seems ok, it threw up a few false positives when I installed it but aside from that it's never done a thing. That said our machines are all firewalled up to the nines anyway, and all outbound web access goes through a virus scanning proxy, so the risk internally is pretty low.

lockstock2sb

2,855 posts

274 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
I use it on my citrix internet servers and it hasnt detected anything yet so i have to put that down to the servers being clean..

Its a beta that expires in 200 days or so, after that i suspect it will become a paid product and cease to function so i'd think twice about integrating it into a image if you plan on not changing it for a while

neil_cardiff

17,113 posts

295 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
IIRC correctly MS were not really considering to release this verison for Corp environments, they were planning on rolling out a different version.

I'd look at the competitors that you have to pay for as to be brutally honest I can't quite see MS being able to provide the level of security for this sort of product.

Its the same with their dip in the water of AV products - while I commend them for trying to force to big players to rethink their monopoly on the corp markets, I wouldn't trust a MS Antivirus product as far as I can throw it until its well and truely bedded in...i.e at least a service pack in.

It's too much of a security risk to have a product that isn't proven categoricly BY SOMEONE ELSE!!!

FourWheelDrift

92,391 posts

315 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
I've also used this Spy Sweeper - www.webroot.com/

Very similar to Microsoft's tool but has a small/medium business version.

lockstock2sb

2,855 posts

274 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
neil_cardiff said:

It's too much of a security risk to have a product that isn't proven categoricly BY SOMEONE ELSE!!!


I'd agree there, and would recommend Ad-aware, and Search and Destroy to all be run alongside each other to catch any nasty spyware Seems to be doing the job nicely.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

279 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
I think we need to be careful to seperate corporate from home user here.

Would anyone use Spybot/Adaware in a corp. environment? I'm not sure the management tools allow for it to be rolled out to any more than a handful of desktops.

agent006

Original Poster:

12,058 posts

295 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
Would anyone use Spybot/Adaware in a corp. environment? I'm not sure the management tools allow for it to be rolled out to any more than a handful of desktops.


Exactly. Windows Defender has updates available via WSUS, which is what alerted my gadget sensors. We don't have a problem with spyware as such, but i'd like to get a bit ahead of the game.

jamieboy

5,931 posts

260 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
neil_cardiff said:
I'd look at the competitors...I wouldn't trust a MS Antivirus product as far as I can throw it until its well and truely bedded in...It's too much of a security risk to have a product that isn't proven categoricly BY SOMEONE ELSE!!!
But weren't these both stand-alone products in their own right, before Microsoft bought the companies?

Not sure if that gives them more credibility or less, but although they're Microsoft's first releases of the product, they're not the first releases of the products ever.

Various places I've been have used AV products from McAfee, Sophos, and Symantec, and I'd struggle to say any of them was better or worse than any of the others.

I've not been aware of any enterprise anti-spyware, though - be interested to hear what you're all using.

neil_cardiff

17,113 posts

295 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
jamieboy said:
neil_cardiff said:
I'd look at the competitors...I wouldn't trust a MS Antivirus product as far as I can throw it until its well and truely bedded in...It's too much of a security risk to have a product that isn't proven categoricly BY SOMEONE ELSE!!!
But weren't these both stand-alone products in their own right, before Microsoft bought the companies?

Not sure if that gives them more credibility or less, but although they're Microsoft's first releases of the product, they're not the first releases of the products ever.

Various places I've been have used AV products from McAfee, Sophos, and Symantec, and I'd struggle to say any of them was better or worse than any of the others.

I've not been aware of any enterprise anti-spyware, though - be interested to hear what you're all using.


There are anti-spyware management tools out there but they obviously cost money. The idea with MS Defender will be that it should be free. Having said that I haven't read any white papers on it yet.

However, thinking back to the whole Windows Firewall escapade, which was as useless as a chocolate teapot in a corp environment - so much so that MS recommended corp users to disable it within the LAN - I'd be interested to see what (not if) holes appear within the software.

Certainly it'd be easier to do without it by ensuring you control your users browsing habits, but thats getting bloody hard without the use of harware av scanning gateways (for example NAI E500 device) which obivously lock everything down...

aldi

9,293 posts

268 months

Tuesday 14th February 2006
quotequote all
Have used it only on an ad-hoc basis for erm 'certain users' you know the ones. Not as a general pre-emptive build time thing. No problems except it expiring from time to time and needing to be reinstaled.

I've noticed some of the newer AV programs are claiming spyware protection as well as AV, maybe that will be the way to go?