Renault Sport Clio 220 Trophy: Driven

Oh Renault, you horrible tease. Having got as far as allowing media to drive working R.S.16 prototypes, the project was cancelled. It looked to have addressed the biggest criticisms of this fourth generation Clio R.S. - namely the lack of both a manual gearbox and some visual aggression - with a pugnacious, pumped up pocket rocket, ready to show the rest of the world that Renault Sport still had it. Now it's never going to happen.

Frankly, the standard car would have required a price drop to somewhere around £12K for prospective buyers to really see a silver lining, and that wasn't going to happen. To have got so close and then be denied such a creation will probably only increase resentment to the standard car. And that fire didn't need any more stoking, did it? Imagine as a child your parents suggested a holiday to sunny Spain, showed you the brochure and told you about the plane, but you ended up in the same caravan as usual on cost grounds; whether you liked the caravan or not before, it's hard not to feel a little hard done by.

Alright, this isn't quite the same caravan, and that's harsh on what remains a very good hot hatch. Yes, despite what The Internet tells you. Even that Chris Harris off the TV liked it, remember. For its Phase 2 generation the Clio 220 Trophy gets an R.S.16 look (that car again) with new headlights and DRLs, plus some nattier wheel designs too. An Akrapovic exhaust, said to build on the lessons learnt from the Clio Who Must Not Be Named, is also optionally available and fitted here.

Play it again, Sam
By and large it's the same Trophy though, which is a good thing. Alright, the gearbox still frustrates on occasion. Quelle surprise. Essentially you want to leave it in Race, which gives you decent manual control (it won't kickdown, and you can crash into the limiter as you please) with rapid shifts too. The auto modes are odd, the regular auto quite lazy and the Sport setting just too urgent, unnecessarily holding or seeking low gears even on relatively light throttle inputs. Weirdly the old Trophy didn't seem so awkward, though perhaps it shows how good alternative automatics have become.

However - and it is a significant however - this Clio remains properly good fun. Sat low in some excellent seats, guiding it with some light but accurate steering and flicking up and down the gears with those big metal pedals, the Trophy is very enjoyable. Indeed, and as has been discussed before, the Clio's chassis feels a bit smarter than the Fiesta ST; even as a firmer Trophy, the damping here always avoids the jarring nature of the Fiesta while controlling the body perhaps even more convincingly.

That £900 Akrapovic system makes a difference too. Predictable though it may sound, there's a distinct Megane impression to the noise, blaring through the revs, parping profusely on full throttle upshifts and even allowing for the odd overrun pop and crackle. Furthermore, the exhaust is only at its loudest with the gearbox in its Race mode, so there's all the more reason to keep it there. Otherwise the noise is a little dour. Turns all the driver aids off too...

Drive the Trophy hard on a decent road and it's really hard to see where the criticism is coming from though. Sure, it no longer screams way past seven thousand anymore but then neither does a Fiesta, or a 208, or any of its rivals - this is the brave new turbo hot hatch world that we must face. The brakes are really strong, the gearbox will (mostly) give you last minute downchanges through its close ratios and the chassis is agile and tweakable. Whether you like the paddles or not, this Trophy remains a hoot in the right situation.

Trouble is, so are its rivals. The Peugeot Sport 208 brings a limited-slip diff that the Renault sometimes feels it needs, while the Fiesta of course offers such a lot of fun for so little money. It should be about to get even better too. Speaking of cost our test Clio came with a list price of £26,420, which is ridiculous.

However, as is often the way with these things, the list price only tells part of the story. Delivery mileage Trophys - albeit pre-facelift cars - are available at less than £17,000, which makes it far more competitive. The Peugeot and Ford remain more exciting hot hatches to us, though that doesn't leave the Clio a distant third - it's a genuine competitor for two great hot hatches. If you're looking at a new one then seek an example out with the Akrapovic, as it feels a worthwhile option, otherwise it's more than good enough. No really, it is.

: 1,618cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 6-speed dual-clutch auto, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 220@6,050rpm
Torque (lb ft):207 @2,000rpm
0-62mph: 6.6sec
Top speed: 146mph
Weight: 1,204kg
MPG: 47.9mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 135g/km
Price: £22,425 (As tested £26,420 comprised of £900 for Akrapovic exhaust, £250 for heated front seat, £1,300 for Liquid Yellow metallic paint, £295 for Renault Sport Monitor v2 and £1,250 for Dark carbon part leather, part synthetic, part cloth upholstery with R.S logo on front)







[Photos: Ben Lowden]

P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (38) Join the discussion on the forum

  • HardMiles 13 Mar 2017

    Total guff. Loads of money, for not a lot. Only just beats GT cars from the 80's to 60, in less style & will depreciate like it's on fire...

    Who buys this st!?????

  • HJMS123 13 Mar 2017

    I see a white one (pre-facelift .. not sure if it's a trophy) some mornings on the way into work and they really are quite understated. I don't think it helps that with a quick glance they can look like the 'dynamique' models.

  • nickfrog 13 Mar 2017

    If you don't mind the box, a pre-FL at £17k seems excellent VFM. Shouldn't depreciate too much either at the money, £150/month tops for a couple of years. Bargain for someone.

  • FN2TypeR 13 Mar 2017

    I couldn't walk past a 208gti Peugeot Sport for this under any circumstances frankly.

  • SarGara 13 Mar 2017

    It uses the same engine as the Juke which Nissan offer with a manual option so why do Renault insist on this auto only approach? Is it just about not admitting they were wrong at this point?

View all comments in the forums Make a comment