Boomer life according to the economist

Boomer life according to the economist

Author
Discussion

Condi

17,321 posts

172 months

Thursday 9th May
quotequote all
Steve H said:
Bloody work-shy millennials
Don't we work, on average, more hours now than any time in the past?

Steve H

5,360 posts

196 months

Thursday 9th May
quotequote all
Condi said:
Steve H said:
Bloody work-shy millennials
Don't we work, on average, more hours now than any time in the past?
Honestly I don’t know but I haven’t seen any sign of it.

I used to routinely do 50-60+ hrs a week and now don’t but that’s an age privilege that I expect most generations will get if they manage it properly.

BandOfBrothers

162 posts

1 month

Thursday 9th May
quotequote all
Steve H said:
Condi said:
Steve H said:
Bloody work-shy millennials
Don't we work, on average, more hours now than any time in the past?
Honestly I don’t know but I haven’t seen any sign of it.

I used to routinely do 50-60+ hrs a week and now don’t but that’s an age privilege that I expect most generations will get if they manage it properly.
The hoops people will jump through to justify younger people not having it hard...

havoc

30,199 posts

236 months

Thursday 9th May
quotequote all
Steve H said:
...that’s an age privilege that I expect most generations will get...
Peak boomer, right there ladies and gentlemen!

Steve H

5,360 posts

196 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
havoc said:
Steve H said:
...that’s an age privilege that I expect most generations will get...
Peak boomer, right there ladies and gentlemen!
Nice try kiddo but while I am gen X, I am happy enough to think that working hard in younger life should return benefits later on.

Peak entitled millennial to think they are getting it harder not easier and to expect all the privileges without having to put the work in first wink .

To answer Condi’s question it would seem that work hours are on average shorter now, not longer.



bitchstewie

51,738 posts

211 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
Love this idea that working hard is all about the hours confused

Slow.Patrol

540 posts

15 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Love this idea that working hard is all about the hours confused
Do you work Stewie?


havoc

30,199 posts

236 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
Steve H said:
To answer Condi’s question it would seem that work hours are on average shorter now, not longer.
But unpaid overtime is a lot more prevalent. Historically o/t would be paid or rewarded with TOIL. More recently it's just become part of the job for many.

I wonder if that would skew the statistics at all?

Hustle_

24,772 posts

161 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
Second jobs / gig economy / zero hour contracts?

Social media is constantly telling us that we need to have the right 'grindset'. We should have a 'side hustle' etc etc

Ask your Uber driver what they do for a living.

bitchstewie

51,738 posts

211 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
Slow.Patrol said:
Do you work Stewie?
Yes I do.

Why does that matter?

Condi

17,321 posts

172 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
Maybe the statistic was household working hours higher, with most households having 2 working people vs 1 or 1 and 1 part time in the past.

If people are working less then that's great. There is more to life than work.

turbobloke

104,197 posts

261 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
Condi said:
Maybe the statistic was household working hours higher, with most households having 2 working people vs 1 or 1 and 1 part time in the past.

If people are working less then that's great. There is more to life than work.
ISWYM though work is part of life and work can be a very enjoyable part of life. There have been many occasions in my working life, possibly for others too, when I would not have wanted a free holiday had one been offered at that time, as work was far too interesting and emjoyable to leave for a bit of sun, some new sights, different food and so on. In fact holidays have needed very careful planning to avoid being a pain in the ass. Life and work differ a lot with different people and different work. However this is a tad O/T.

otolith

56,471 posts

205 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
ISWYM though work is part of life and work can be a very enjoyable part of life. There have been many occasions in my working life, possibly for others too, when I would not have wanted a free holiday had one been offered at that time, as work was far too interesting and emjoyable to leave for a bit of sun, some new sights, different food and so on. In fact holidays have needed very careful planning to avoid being a pain in the ass. Life and work differ a lot with different people and different work. However this is a tad O/T.
Judging by the proportion of the boomer generation who had the the opportunity to retire early and took it, perhaps not a ubiquitous position.

mwstewart

7,672 posts

189 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
Interesting talk on generation labels


havoc

30,199 posts

236 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
otolith said:
Judging by the proportion of the boomer generation who had the the opportunity to retire early and took it, perhaps not a ubiquitous position.
yes

...and by the time you've worked 30+ years of your life, the (financial) opportunity to do something different / be in control of your own time would appeal to most people, I'd suggest. Shame that most Gen X and below are unlikely to get that opportunity until they've worked closer to 50 years...

Steve H

5,360 posts

196 months

Friday 10th May
quotequote all
havoc said:
But unpaid overtime is a lot more prevalent. Historically o/t would be paid or rewarded with TOIL. More recently it's just become part of the job for many.

I wonder if that would skew the statistics at all?
Maybe, although I would have thought they would have surveyed actual working hours not just contracted hours.

That chart came from here but most stuff I could find was similar.

https://neweconomics.org/2019/03/average-weekly-ho...



bhstewie said:
Love this idea that working hard is all about the hours confused
It’s certainly a factor I would say. But I wouldn’t think that the average job now is as physically hard as 30-40 years ago in which case they were working harder and longer. Maybe stress levels are higher now but they may just be more acknowledged.


Condi said:
Maybe the statistic was household working hours higher, with most households having 2 working people vs 1 or 1 and 1 part time in the past.

If people are working less then that's great. There is more to life than work.
Totally agree.

havoc said:
yes

...and by the time you've worked 30+ years of your life, the (financial) opportunity to do something different / be in control of your own time would appeal to most people, I'd suggest. Shame that most Gen X and below are unlikely to get that opportunity until they've worked closer to 50 years...
Most boomers didn’t either.

Gary C

12,569 posts

180 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
havoc said:
yes

...and by the time you've worked 30+ years of your life, the (financial) opportunity to do something different / be in control of your own time would appeal to most people, I'd suggest. Shame that most Gen X and below are unlikely to get that opportunity until they've worked closer to 50 years...
In my experience, Gen X are ok.

NRS

22,251 posts

202 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
A good policy could be to give Millenials and younger a £140 000 grant from the government to help with house purchases to balance things up.

Sheepshanks

32,928 posts

120 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
NRS said:
A good policy could be to give Millenials and younger a £140 000 grant from the government to help with house purchases to balance things up.
Hmm……guess what would happen?

turbobloke

104,197 posts

261 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
NRS said:
A good policy could be to give Millenials and younger a £140 000 grant from the government to help with house purchases to balance things up.
Hmm……guess what would happen?
Not being an economist I asked one of my goldfish, so it's possible their bubbling reply has been misinterpreted, but it went something like this

-hand out £140k lump sums in such a way it can only be used with a house purchase only (otherwise toppish end cars, gadgets, holidays etc)
-demand through the roof
-prices through the roof
and
-more government borrowing for future generations to pay back in higher taxes

How did it do? It doesn't have a roof, or a credit rating, so may be bubbling bks.