RE: New 550hp BMW M4 CS promises 'iconic M feeling'

RE: New 550hp BMW M4 CS promises 'iconic M feeling'

Author
Discussion

Twinair

673 posts

143 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Twinair said:
Aside from the comments about the looks (I liked my M4, Sau Paulo Yellow over Yas Marina Blue interior) for me the elephant in the room is the price per value.

I bought my M4 X Drive in March 2022, a year later - I struggled to get £60K for it. I would have, tried to buy an M3 CS - but in the end I bought a much safer bet financially and went for a - GT4.

If you want an M4 - get a very lightly used year old one, (it’s difficult to use them ‘hard’ on public roads - they do prison speed pace - pretty much everywhere, laughably so tbh) so a lightly used one is what you can get.

It would literally be half the price of this CS.

For me - even for me - who changes every 12 months, it would be hard to justify this kind of loss every year. Sure the dealers will tell you the CS ‘will hold its value better’ - but that’s not true, I was offered a CS M3 ‘just after I got the GT4’ for mid £90’s K.

I mean, if you want an M4 CS - go for it, but it does not make a great value proposition per M4 lightly used… imho…
TBF though the CS is usually much better. Whether it's worth £30k extra is down to the individual.

I owned the previous gen M3cs, one of my favourite ever cars.

TX.
True enough, I wouldn’t be the one to say ‘don’t do the extra 30k’..!

If you can afford it - do it..!

I was just reflecting - at around £50k a G82 M4 is a hell of lightly used proposition - if you want max forward & 4WD grip, they are good fun at that price point…

I liked the M3 CS, I would buy one - I can wait a bit though… I will buy an M3 - because saloon - at some point…

Mind you - my little GRY is a corking ‘good fun’ car… I’m very happy with it - versus the M4 and the GT4 of the last 2 years…

WPA

8,946 posts

115 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Just a complete and utter mess styling wise.

Marcodude

61 posts

127 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
CountyAFC said:
Magikarp said:
That colour is utterly gorgeous. The profile looks good, the wheels look good. The front is fking revolting.
Any matte colour awful IMO.

The metallic version is lovely though. As is Alfas Montreal Green.
Did they not just simply copy Alfa Romeo with that colour?

The Alfa Romeo Green Montreal is beautiful..they have used that to tart up this rather ugly BMW

Edited by Marcodude on Wednesday 8th May 14:27

CG2020UK

1,576 posts

41 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Love it!

Ridiculously fast and can carry the family about what’s not to like.

Insane Nurburgring time if that’s your thing.

Jealous of anyone who owns. I imagine this might be Evos car of the year in 8 months.

Wills2

23,047 posts

176 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Baileyk said:
Ken_Code said:
What on Earth does that mean?
Rough translation ( i think...) They prefer a manual transmission that feels like the cocking of an old rifle when changing gear, opposed to that of a modern auto gearbox.
Well you won't find that gear change action in any BMW past or present, as they are mostly woeful.





CG2020UK

1,576 posts

41 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
Well you won't find that gear change action in any BMW past or present, as they are mostly woeful.
+1


R6tty

290 posts

16 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
I for one just don't see the maybe obvious knee-jerk reaction to hate the styling. They look nowhere near as bad in the flesh, and certainly there are a lot worse looking cars at the moment, including others coming out of Germany.

Forester1965

1,793 posts

4 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
Well you won't find that gear change action in any BMW past or present, as they are mostly woeful.



Oddly enough I was boring my wife at the weekend saying how the original Honda Jazz had a much more satisfying gear change than any BMW we'd owned and the irony in the types of people who buy them.

Atmospheric

5,316 posts

209 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Another PCP special

Sisu9

275 posts

103 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
It's really annoying that these hideous looking BMW's are pushing up the price of the price of F80 and other pre-pig snout BMWs.

cerb4.5lee

30,945 posts

181 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
cerb4.5lee said:
I often think this about my standard F82 M4 as well, and obviously that isn't even quick in comparison to this. I feel myself occasionally holding back a bit in it, because you look down and you've passed the legal 70mph with just a twist of your toe for example.

That being said, I still really...really want a G82 M4 xDrive though for sure. driving
You'd probably miss the edge of the rwd m4 though, one of the things I loved about my F80 m3 was that feeling that it could let go IF you over did it, added a bit of zest to a drive (even though you had lots of grip to spare).

When you tipped it into a corner you could really feel the grip build up instantly down the side of the car I really liked that feeling.
Yes bud and I'm completely with you. I love the F82 M4 in the dry and it is very capable as you say, plus it isn't too big and heavy either(relatively). It can be a bit of a pig in the cold and wet though, and there have been a few times when I've needed new pants in fairness! hehe

redroadster

1,766 posts

233 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Bmw lost there way in the styling dept there are some munters in there range ,pity because they all go well pity they have lost there touch .

Bladedancer

1,299 posts

197 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Ken_Code said:
Bladedancer said:
Not really. I prefer proper 223 rem in rifle form rather than an SMG made from a tin can.
What on Earth does that mean?
You obviously didn't get the joke or the reference.

stuart100

492 posts

58 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Bladedancer said:
Ken_Code said:
Bladedancer said:
Not really. I prefer proper 223 rem in rifle form rather than an SMG made from a tin can.
What on Earth does that mean?
You obviously didn't get the joke or the reference.
I can't see anyone getting this!

Ken_Code

759 posts

3 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Bladedancer said:
You obviously didn't get the joke or the reference.
Yes, you can tell that because I asked what it means.

It sounds like something to do with guns.

Rusty Old-Banger

4,026 posts

214 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Ken_Code said:
Bladedancer said:
Not really. I prefer proper 223 rem in rifle form rather than an SMG made from a tin can.
What on Earth does that mean?


Some people get a little excited talking about it.

Forester1965

1,793 posts

4 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Am gonna say it; objectively I'm sure it's great but it's not worth the premium over the standard one. The only way it'll justify one is scarcity.

ghost83

5,486 posts

191 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Still think this is awful looking

Not for me

GLS

101 posts

32 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
rusti said:
This car was ugly, is ugly and probably remains to be ugly until the braindead designers are finally being fired.
And by the way nobody needs or wants a car with climate control functions in a menu. I have the M3 E92 which has a knob to turn. Whats wrong with that? Every idiot can handle that instead of cursing at f**king touchscreens.
Someone's devoted to knobs...

gruppeb86

363 posts

14 months

Wednesday 8th May
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
To be fair there was never anything wrong with buttons and dials to control the heating (and many other things). The move to centralise on a screen is cost cutting dressed up as modernity.
Agreed. When you can see through it all (often from experience/the passing of time), you quickly appreciate it's simply another way of encouraging gullible people.