The Official Liverpool FC thread [Vol 6]
The Official Liverpool FC thread [Vol 6]
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

im

34,302 posts

243 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
'Brendan Rodgers: I only want winners for Reds this summer.'

Begs the question of what he wanted in previous times then.

Of course if it wasn't winners he chose well.

wink

deadmau5

3,197 posts

206 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
A vote of confidence by the chairman/owner must be an in-joke surely?

hornetrider

63,161 posts

231 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
Mattchew13 said:
Just clicked on that and been prompted with a message telling me to subscribe because I've viewed 20 articles this month - crazy!
Clear cookies = profit smile

cerb4.5lee

42,801 posts

206 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
im said:
'Brendan Rodgers: I only want winners for Reds this summer.'

Begs the question of what he wanted in previous times then.

Of course if it wasn't winners he chose well.

wink
Exactly!

im

34,302 posts

243 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
This must be a weight off Brendan's mind...

http://news.sky.com/story/1095196/footballers-clea...

Glenred

8,472 posts

232 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
im said:
This must be a weight off Brendan's mind...

http://news.sky.com/story/1095196/footballers-clea...
So basically she lied.

im

34,302 posts

243 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
Glenred said:
im said:
This must be a weight off Brendan's mind...

http://news.sky.com/story/1095196/footballers-clea...
So basically she lied.
Looks that way yes...or at the very least couldn't back-up her accusations with anything tangible.

Although you have to ask yourself what prompted the DPP to take this to trial...presumably they had more than just her word.

Baffling.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

175 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
It came out after the trial that she lied routinely to all sorts of people, gave inconsistent accounts & failed to produce evidence she previously said she had.

What's happened there is a dizzy young girl with a thing for footballers has got slaughtered in Brighton on a night out & gone off with a bunch of not so bright players who thought it'd be a laugh to go back to a hotel & see what happens.


Stupid loves company it seems.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

281 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
It came out after the trial that she lied routinely to all sorts of people, gave inconsistent accounts & failed to produce evidence she previously said she had.

What's happened there is a dizzy young girl with a thing for footballers has got slaughtered in Brighton on a night out & gone off with a bunch of not so bright players who thought it'd be a laugh to go back to a hotel & see what happens.


Stupid loves company it seems.
I wonder what she will be charged with?

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

175 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
Given that it was a retrial, that is a good question. The costs must be up near the million mark.

im

34,302 posts

243 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Justin Cyder said:
It came out after the trial that she lied routinely to all sorts of people, gave inconsistent accounts & failed to produce evidence she previously said she had.

What's happened there is a dizzy young girl with a thing for footballers has got slaughtered in Brighton on a night out & gone off with a bunch of not so bright players who thought it'd be a laugh to go back to a hotel & see what happens.


Stupid loves company it seems.
I wonder what she will be charged with?
Unless they can prove perjury or perverting the course of justice they'll be no charges.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

281 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
im said:
Unless they can prove perjury or perverting the course of justice they'll be no charges.
Precisely my point. Pretty much these men will have their names in the paper, accused of whatever crime, and as we all know mud sticks. I hope for her sake it was not an utter fabrication, because if she has done that then she deserves a far harsher punishment than fk all.

RedTrident

8,290 posts

261 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
hornetrider said:


As if the public backing of a chairman ever me want anything.

But regardless, please share your thoughts on remarkable progress. Maybe its remarkable because we don't have a relic in charge? Maybe its remarkable because they thought they'd have to sack him after the worst start to a season any of us remember. But I'm sure all of us would like to know what was so remarkable about this season.

Even I agree he's done enough in the later half of the season to be given at least till Xmas next season, but remarkable progress? No wonder you're rolling around laughing.

Pothole

34,367 posts

308 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
im said:
Unless they can prove perjury or perverting the course of justice they'll be no charges.
Precisely my point. Pretty much these men will have their names in the paper, accused of whatever crime, and as we all know mud sticks. I hope for her sake it was not an utter fabrication, because if she has done that then she deserves a far harsher punishment than fk all.
It wasn't a total fabrication, there are photos to prove that...probably still being bandied about now they can boast about their exploits again.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

281 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
There is a huge difference between her consenting to said pics, and not. As I said, IF her story is an utter fabrication, (with regards to her claims).

im

34,302 posts

243 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
Pothole said:
TheHeretic said:
im said:
Unless they can prove perjury or perverting the course of justice they'll be no charges.
Precisely my point. Pretty much these men will have their names in the paper, accused of whatever crime, and as we all know mud sticks. I hope for her sake it was not an utter fabrication, because if she has done that then she deserves a far harsher punishment than fk all.
It wasn't a total fabrication, there are photos to prove that...probably still being bandied about now they can boast about their exploits again.
There's ONE photo and it's not sexually explicit.

Justin Cyder

12,624 posts

175 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
Unless you have a shaving foam fetish. And that is one photo in spite of forensic investigation of all the defendant's phones.

Glenred

8,472 posts

232 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
Justin Cyder said:
Unless you have a shaving foam fetish. And that is one photo in spite of forensic investigation of all the defendant's phones.
Pothole's a pervy weirdo yes



Dift

1,675 posts

253 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
Happy Istanbul day everybody smile

phil_cardiff

8,423 posts

234 months

Saturday 25th May 2013
quotequote all
Dift said:
Happy Istanbul day everybody smile
I'm afraid you'll have to explain that to the resident Spuds and Blue nose, they simply won't understand the meaning, poor things.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED