Most undeservedly unlucky racing driver
Most undeservedly unlucky racing driver
Author
Discussion

Guillotine

5,516 posts

290 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
Phillippe Massa

Not withstanding the fact that he survived a spring in the head at 150mph...good luck I'd say

World champion for 1 corner and about 10 secs!
Robbed by Lewis who passed Glock who suddenly decided to give up at the penultimate corner
Massa could do no more! I really felt for him

Edited by Guillotine on Friday 14th June 13:43

Muzzer79

12,823 posts

213 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
Muzzer79 said:
Really?

Recent (to me) revelations about what he was like to work with have clouded his image a little for me.
Do tell.
Mansell was always portrayed as the hard-done-by Brit who fought to the last, but was screwed by Williams, screwed by Prost, screwed by Lotus, screwed by everyone.

However, a lot of people have come out recently and openly said how much of a st he was to work with. I'm talking Mario Andretti (who called him the worst team-mate he ever had) Gerhard Berger, various mechanics, Patrick Head, etc.

It seems like he thought that the way to finally win the title was to be incredibly self-centred and centre the entire team around yourself, like his peers, Prost and Senna. Some might argue that's the right way to be but it seems a bit hypocritical to complain about that so much during his driving career but actually be like that yourself.

slipstream 1985

13,683 posts

205 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
Guillotine said:
Phillippe Massa

Not withstanding the fact that he survived a spring in the head at 150mph...good luck I'd say

World champion for 1 corner and about 10 secs!
Robbed by Lewis who passed Glock who suddenly decided to give up at the penultimate corner
Massa could do no more! I really felt for him

Edited by Guillotine on Friday 14th June 13:43
massa as a world champion would have been undeserving. thats one occasion. id say the spirit of the thread is someone who has lost out on more than one occasion

entropy

6,441 posts

229 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
Mansell was always portrayed as the hard-done-by Brit who fought to the last, but was screwed by Williams, screwed by Prost, screwed by Lotus, screwed by everyone.

However, a lot of people have come out recently and openly said how much of a st he was to work with. I'm talking Mario Andretti (who called him the worst team-mate he ever had) Gerhard Berger, various mechanics, Patrick Head, etc.

It seems like he thought that the way to finally win the title was to be incredibly self-centred and centre the entire team around yourself, like his peers, Prost and Senna. Some might argue that's the right way to be but it seems a bit hypocritical to complain about that so much during his driving career but actually be like that yourself.
Mansell is a hero of mine and agree with your points but is it any wonder he became even more of a self centered so and so considering some of the s**t he had to put with.

Prost was political and so was Piquet who demanded number one status - at one point going to Frank Williams lying in a hospital bed and paralysed: "you made me number one driver, do you remember?"

As for Mario he would not have been champion if he hadn't had the balls to take on Graham Chapman.

Berger played mind games with Alesi.

You have to stand up and be counted and be self centred once in a while even ruthless to succeed.

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

240 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
For me Brundle is right up there - a strong contender for best F1 driver never to have won a race. Always in the wrong car at the wrong time. Waited a career to get into a team like McLaren and they gave him one of the worst cars (in terms of competitiveness) that they ever produced. Still dragged it onto the podium at Monaco though. I reckon he would have more LeMans titles but not for car defects too.

freedman

6,013 posts

233 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
entropy said:


As for Mario he would not have been champion if he hadn't had the balls to take on Graham Chapman.

.
Or if Ronnie had been given equal equipment and been allowed to actually race him

airbrakes

Original Poster:

10,712 posts

186 months

Friday 14th June 2013
quotequote all
freedman said:
entropy said:


As for Mario he would not have been champion if he hadn't had the balls to take on Graham Chapman.

.
Or if Ronnie had been given equal equipment and been allowed to actually race him
Unless there happened to be a Monty Python F1 team back then, I assume you mean Colin Chapman?

Fantuzzi

3,297 posts

172 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
stephen300o said:
mollytherocker said:
You believe in fate and luck?

How quaint.
Your atheism is out of control.
laugh
I'm guessing by bad luck he meant 'bad things that have no relation to their standard of driving or levels of talent'. And using fate figuratively.

As opposed to the will of the Gods...


Grenoble

58,549 posts

181 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
Altrezia said:
I don't think there is such a thing as an unlucky racing driver. They're all getting to do what they love.
I think getting nearly decapitated by a Marshall that should not have been there counts as unlucky (Pryce)...

entropy

6,441 posts

229 months

Saturday 15th June 2013
quotequote all
airbrakes said:
Unless there happened to be a Monty Python F1 team back then, I assume you mean Colin Chapman?
Oops, my bad!

Mark Martin - greatest driver in NASCAR not to win a championship.

BBS-LM

3,978 posts

250 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
tonytifoso said:
You'd have think Robert Kubica is a pretty good candidate for this. Such a shame for him.
Just what I was going to say, I like Kubica but the guy is Doomed.

lap_time

339 posts

253 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
Anyone not named "M. Schumacher" from 2000-2004. wink

Mark13

411 posts

204 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
Really?

I count two - '92 obviously, but only '86 as the other. He was unlucky with that tyre blowout and the fact that he held it together so they didn't stop the race. With a red flag, he'd have been World Champion.

But I can't think of other years he was unlucky and should have won. '85 he was learning, '87 he binned it in Qualifying in Japan, '88 the Williams was hopeless, '89 & '90 Ferraris were either not reliable or fast enough, '91 Williams was too unreliable and he went off in a strop in '93.

He was my racing hero as a kid. It was always hard-done-by Nige and he was spectacular to watch. Recent (to me) revelations about what he was like to work with have clouded his image a little for me.
For 87, had he been champion in 86, he would have had the confidence to build momentum. He was often the fastest in 87 but had some terrible luck and as a result ended up psyching himself out of it. Confidence is an unbelievably powerful factor.

Mark13

411 posts

204 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
Mansell was always portrayed as the hard-done-by Brit who fought to the last, but was screwed by Williams, screwed by Prost, screwed by Lotus, screwed by everyone.

However, a lot of people have come out recently and openly said how much of a st he was to work with. I'm talking Mario Andretti (who called him the worst team-mate he ever had) Gerhard Berger, various mechanics, Patrick Head, etc.

It seems like he thought that the way to finally win the title was to be incredibly self-centred and centre the entire team around yourself, like his peers, Prost and Senna. Some might argue that's the right way to be but it seems a bit hypocritical to complain about that so much during his driving career but actually be like that yourself.
We are talking about how unlucky he was, not whether he was easy to work with. He is an easy target to have a pop at because he wears his heart on his sleave and with his brummie accent. Piquet was very good at making jokes at others expense but didnt like it when he got similar treatment from others. Schumacher had his character flaw of believing so much in his own dominance that he would drive people off the road if he wasnt able to win fairly. Senna blocked anyone joining his team who may have threatened his total focus etc etc. The American drivers came up through a totally different school. Andretti in particular got his reward for keeping lotus focussed until he gothis hands on a vastly superior car. His honourable team mate was probably faster but knew that he had given ghis word to support Mario and was as good as his word. Indirectly he lost his life because of it.

DanielSan

19,907 posts

193 months

Monday 17th June 2013
quotequote all
belleair302 said:
Surely Tiff Needell needs a mention. A lengthy career but never the break needed to drive with a top team and often driving a bad car very well. The late Piers Courage would also be on my list of drivers too.
Tiff was my first thought to be honest.

phatgixer

4,988 posts

275 months

Tuesday 18th June 2013
quotequote all
Stefan Bellof.

What could have been?

Redlake27

2,255 posts

270 months

Tuesday 18th June 2013
quotequote all
I'd say Jean Alesi

If he'd left Tyrrell for Williams (as planned), he'd have had Mansell's seat for 91 and 92, and Prost wouldn't have joined to become '93 champion either. Could Alesi have been 92, 93, 95, 96 or 97 champion in a Williams? (It all depended on whether Senna had joined Williams and lived, but it's an interesting thought...)

I don't think Alesi was a Senna, but he was at least as talented as Hill, Coulthard or Villeneuve who won a lot of races in 90s Williams.

I also think the discipline of Williams would have created a more rounded talent than the one we saw at Ferrari and Benetton.


There were several more races in 1994/5 that Alesi could have won in the Ferrari, but he ended up with some very unlucky retirements......such as being hit by his team-mates camera at Monza!


entropy

6,441 posts

229 months

Tuesday 18th June 2013
quotequote all
phatgixer said:
Stefan Bellof.

What could have been?
Not unlucky, IMHO. He let his balls overrule his head.

phatgixer

4,988 posts

275 months

Tuesday 18th June 2013
quotequote all
entropy said:
Not unlucky, IMHO. He let his balls overrule his head.
Hmmm, I think Ickx being made to look slow may have been a contributor....

Teppic

7,990 posts

283 months

Tuesday 18th June 2013
quotequote all
Redlake27 said:
There were several more races in 1994/5 that Alesi could have won in the Ferrari, but he ended up with some very unlucky retirements......such as being hit by his team-mates camera at Monza!
It was the camera on Alesi's car that fell off and hit Berger's car.