On-the-spot fines planned for careless driving
On-the-spot fines planned for careless driving
Author
Discussion

Speed_Demon

Original Poster:

2,662 posts

218 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all

Stu R

21,641 posts

245 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
On paper it's promising. The execution, I fear, will be where the problems arise.

Google [bot]

6,828 posts

211 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Stu R said:
On paper it's promising. The execution, I fear, will be where the problems arise.
+1. New server required for SP&L forum.

Stu R

21,641 posts

245 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Google [bot] said:
Stu R said:
On paper it's promising. The execution, I fear, will be where the problems arise.
+1. New server required for SP&L forum.
hehe

fatboy b

9,665 posts

246 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
yes just the other day I was cut up by plod at a roundabout. Two exits - left & straight on. Two approach lanes appropriately marked, and me going straight on. Plod decides to go from left lane, cut me up narrowly missing the front of my car to go straight on - no indicators btw. So in this case, could I pull him and give him an OTSF of £100 hehe

Strangely Brown

15,804 posts

261 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Why do they keep coming up with that st. There is no such thing as "on-the-spot" fines. They will be fixed penalty notices and there will be a path of appeal.

diddles

446 posts

229 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Taken from the BBC article.

"Ministers insist the new approach will try to target genuinely reckless motorists rather than those who normally follow the rules but make an inadvertent mistake"

How does a police officer differentiate between the two? Surely to do so this would require an officer to observe the driving standard for potentially several hundred miles. Sounds like a dangerous and flawed law to me.


anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
Unworkable.

Especially as many police drivers these days are beyond dangerous.

When was the last time you saw an erratic driver being pulled over by the plod?


And why don't plod make middle lane hogs move over ?????



All hot air IMO
I think I agree. I was listening to the proposals this morning whilst driving to work. They mention giving a fine for undertaking - considering I undertake most days (due to idiots at 65mph in L2/3, with nothing in front of them) I would rather they addressed the cause of it, as mentioned above, MLM's should be first on the hitlist.

streaky

19,311 posts

279 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Stu R said:
On paper it's promising. The execution, I fear, will be where the problems arise.
I thought it was just fines. I hadn't realised they were proposing such summary justice at the roadside. Disposing of the remains will cause problems, and I imagine there will be Health & Safety issues too. wink

Streaky

williamp

20,406 posts

303 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
cctv will be used, manned by officers.

simoid

19,774 posts

188 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
On bbc breakfast soon, with some representation from motoring groups.

I wonder if there'll be any mention of the fact that for 'careless driving' of 'undertaking' as they put it, there will probably also be a careless driver not returning to the left after overtaking.

Where's my MP's address...

Stu R

21,641 posts

245 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
streaky said:
Stu R said:
On paper it's promising. The execution, I fear, will be where the problems arise.
I thought it was just fines. I hadn't realised they were proposing such summary justice at the roadside. Disposing of the remains will cause problems, and I imagine there will be Health & Safety issues too. wink

Streaky
You should be on stage Streaky thumbup




sweeping it!

simoid

19,774 posts

188 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
diddles said:
Taken from the BBC article.

"Ministers insist the new approach will try to target genuinely reckless motorists rather than those who normally follow the rules but make an inadvertent mistake"

How does a police officer differentiate between the two? Surely to do so this would require an officer to observe the driving standard for potentially several hundred miles. Sounds like a dangerous and flawed law to me.
And who is more dangerous: someone who loses concentration in their lethal weapon and drives carelessly as a result or;
someone who is concentrating and deliberately performing a maneouvre outside the guidelines of the highway code?

Why should the police ignore people that are just daydreaming?!

R32

401 posts

282 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
is this another version of s59.. police officers at the roadside become judge and jury?

My guess is this is just an FPN where you can still elect to go to court should you wish.

SarGara

414 posts

206 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
simoid said:
On bbc breakfast soon, with some representation from motoring groups.

I wonder if there'll be any mention of the fact that for 'careless driving' of 'undertaking' as they put it, there will probably also be a careless driver not returning to the left after overtaking.

Where's my MP's address...
I think i average about 1 undertake per 30min commute at the moment. Id argue that im far more aware of my surroundings and alert than any of the tards i end up undertaking so how is that reckless?

Its just not worth the hassle or stress trying to engage when they are obviously in their own world.

andyroo

2,469 posts

240 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Why do they mention undertaking? It shouldn't be possible to undertake unless someone else is using the lane system incorrectly!

What's wrong with traffic police just stopping people and giving them a warning for minor infractions, generally educating the driving public a bit better and pursuing further action if resistance is met?

daveake

687 posts

256 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
andyroo said:
Why do they mention undertaking?
Probably because it will be needed after the summary executions.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
An on the spot fine must, as noted above, permit of access to a court, whether the fine is treated as a criminal sanction or a civil penalty, because of the due process guarantees of article 6 of the ECHR. In practice, on the spot fines are levied at the roadside in, for example, France and Austria (how might I know that, I wonder?) for speeding, which has at least the virtue of reducing hassle.

andyroo

2,469 posts

240 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
daveake said:
Probably because it will be needed after the summary executions.
rofl

simoid

19,774 posts

188 months

Wednesday 11th May 2011
quotequote all
Shirley the power of PH can get a PHer onto the Brake Broadcasting Corporation's breakfast show to discuss these proposals.