Camera on Bridge? - M62
Author
Discussion

Jay-Aim

Original Poster:

598 posts

263 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all
M62 yesterday afternoon

White van parked on top of bridge

What looked like a camera on tripod placed outside in line with middle lane

No signs of speed cameras anywhere

Not an accident blackspot by any means

Questions:
Was it a speed camera? If yes I thought that warning signs had to be up!!!!
At what distance do they zap you?
At what speed are they set to trigger?

PS: I was just following the flow in the outside lane between 70 and 80mph

Thank you

ashes

628 posts

276 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all
My wife saw one of these in Oughtibridge, Sheffield yesterday - tripod pointing down road, chap in van.

Thought they had to be filmimg as well? Or does it just snap willy-nilly

Not in an accident blackspot either strangely

KITT

5,345 posts

263 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all
Jay-Aim said:
Was it a speed camera? If yes I thought that warning signs had to be up!!!!
At what distance do they zap you?
At what speed are they set to trigger?

PS: I was just following the flow in the outside lane between 70 and 80mph

Warning signs don't seem to be a requirement

They zap you from a big distance, normally before you've seen them

70mph+10%+2mph = 79mph so you should be fine at an indicated 80

gfun

620 posts

271 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all


Went through it myself but there were two tripods and van was not marked up?

Very strange arrangement that I have not seen before.

Was certainly causing some panic braking which was not good as you say the traffic was close and busy all doing 80ish when suddenly people stamped on the brakes. Not a good place to be!

daftlad

3,324 posts

263 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all
Seen a few lately on my travels and no signals picked up by Radar Detector. Could it be check on tax discs??

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

278 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all
Realistically, you have to treat any vehicle parked on a motorway bridge as a scamera van. As you get closer you may find it's a worker's van or someone wanting to wind you up, but as a first approximation it's a scamera van. In fact, I now assume every figure on a bridge to be someone with a camera.

baz1985

3,682 posts

267 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all
where abouts was this on the M62? At the Middleton junction???

Teppic

7,899 posts

279 months

Friday 11th June 2004
quotequote all
gfun said:
Went through it myself but there were two tripods and van was not marked up?

Very strange arrangement that I have not seen before.


That sounds like an ANPR set-up. I've seen a set-up like this several times on the A12 now - A plain white van with (sometimes one, sometimes two) tripods in front of it with cameras which resemble CCTV cameras on them. ANPR vans do not have to be marked.

Jay-Aim

Original Poster:

598 posts

263 months

Saturday 12th June 2004
quotequote all
baz1985 said:
where abouts was this on the M62? At the Middleton junction???


Between junction 11 and 12 on one of the bridges

Jay-Aim

Original Poster:

598 posts

263 months

Saturday 12th June 2004
quotequote all
Teppic said:

gfun said:
Went through it myself but there were two tripods and van was not marked up?

Very strange arrangement that I have not seen before.



That sounds like an ANPR set-up. I've seen a set-up like this several times on the A12 now - A plain white van with (sometimes one, sometimes two) tripods in front of it with cameras which resemble CCTV cameras on them. ANPR vans do not have to be marked.


What's ANPR?

streaky

19,311 posts

271 months

Saturday 12th June 2004
quotequote all
Jay-Aim said:

Teppic said:


gfun said:
Went through it myself but there were two tripods and van was not marked up?

Very strange arrangement that I have not seen before.




That sounds like an ANPR set-up. I've seen a set-up like this several times on the A12 now - A plain white van with (sometimes one, sometimes two) tripods in front of it with cameras which resemble CCTV cameras on them. ANPR vans do not have to be marked.



What's ANPR?
Automatic Number Plate Recognition - checks with DVLA/PNC databases and flags up untaxed and wanted vehicles (and "seen in vicinity of crime"?). Usually accompanied by a number of constables in cars and on motorbikes to stop "sus" vehicles - Streaky

Jay-Aim

Original Poster:

598 posts

263 months

Saturday 12th June 2004
quotequote all
Thanks

If it was that (and I didn't see any other cars awaiting to stop anybody!!)then that's actually a GOOD thing and to be encouraged. The challenge is then for the police to gain the trust of the public by NOT having speed cameras on top of bridges

Teppic

7,899 posts

279 months

Saturday 12th June 2004
quotequote all
Jay-Aim said:
Thanks

If it was that (and I didn't see any other cars awaiting to stop anybody!!)then that's actually a GOOD thing and to be encouraged. The challenge is then for the police to gain the trust of the public by NOT having speed cameras on top of bridges


The one I passed on the A12 didn't have cars in attendance. I think it depends on the type of checks being done, e.g. it may be because these ones were used for checking tax disks only as opposed to the full checks.

telecat

8,528 posts

263 months

Saturday 12th June 2004
quotequote all
If Its a Escort or Transit connect it's usually the DVLA van checking for Tax cheats. It has sat on the A64 over the A1 pretty frequently the last couple of months.

gfun

620 posts

271 months

Sunday 13th June 2004
quotequote all
very very happy its checking for un licenced, un insured, un mot'ed cars - not happy at the RTA it was close to causing!

Everyone panics when they see a van now. I used to look for kids/people now I scrutinise every parked van I pass.

hornet

6,333 posts

272 months

Sunday 13th June 2004
quotequote all
Peter Ward said:
Realistically, you have to treat any vehicle parked on a motorway bridge as a scamera van. As you get closer you may find it's a worker's van or someone wanting to wind you up, but as a first approximation it's a scamera van. In fact, I now assume every figure on a bridge to be someone with a camera.


Yep - exactly what I do now. Not just vans on motorway bridges either, it's pretty much ANY van at the side of the road that I don't recognise. Ludicrous state of affairs.

How long before an ANPR van over a motorway causes a pile up that will then justify a scamera van? How ironic would that be?!

Jay-Aim

Original Poster:

598 posts

263 months

Sunday 13th June 2004
quotequote all
hornet said:

Peter Ward said:
Realistically, you have to treat any vehicle parked on a motorway bridge as a scamera van. As you get closer you may find it's a worker's van or someone wanting to wind you up, but as a first approximation it's a scamera van. In fact, I now assume every figure on a bridge to be someone with a camera.



Yep - exactly what I do now. Not just vans on motorway bridges either, it's pretty much ANY van at the side of the road that I don't recognise. Ludicrous state of affairs.

How long before an ANPR van over a motorway causes a pile up that will then justify a scamera van? How ironic would that be?!


Couldn't agree more. You almost wish it to happen to bring the whole issue to a head once and for all!!!!

blademan

493 posts

260 months

Monday 14th June 2004
quotequote all
gfun said:
very very happy its checking for un licenced, un insured, un mot'ed cars - not happy at the RTA it was close to causing!

Everyone panics when they see a van now. I used to look for kids/people now I scrutinise every parked van I pass.


Same here gfun.
I travel up A5 daily and see new van and wonder.
Its moved today and looks like camper but still makes me anchor!! ( rhyming woz an accident )

deeps

5,432 posts

263 months

Monday 14th June 2004
quotequote all
They were on the M5 on Friday too, van in the middle of bridge and a camera on a tripod each side of van covering all six lanes. Think it may be some sort of traffic survey.
No human to be seen, why cant they park the van down the road a bit??

8Pack

5,182 posts

262 months

Monday 14th June 2004
quotequote all
Jay-Aim said:

hornet said:


Peter Ward said:
Realistically, you have to treat any vehicle parked on a motorway bridge as a scamera van. As you get closer you may find it's a worker's van or someone wanting to wind you up, but as a first approximation it's a scamera van. In fact, I now assume every figure on a bridge to be someone with a camera.




Yep - exactly what I do now. Not just vans on motorway bridges either, it's pretty much ANY van at the side of the road that I don't recognise. Ludicrous state of affairs.

How long before an ANPR van over a motorway causes a pile up that will then justify a scamera van? How ironic would that be?!



Couldn't agree more. You almost wish it to happen to bring the whole issue to a head once and for all!!!!


They would only blame it on "speeding drivers" and use it to justify "more" scams. The cynical BDS!!!!