LRC100 question
Author
Discussion

forever_driving

Original Poster:

1,869 posts

273 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Hello all

My dad's just bought himself an LRC100 for his Ultima which he has received in the post today.

Now that its arrived, he's actually unsure whether he needs it since the Ultima's number plater is at a 45° angle and there's no reflective material behind it, it's just a big black and white sticker.



So the question is, with a fibreglass curvey bonnet and no reflective number plate, does my dad need an LRC100?

Cheers for any help


>>> Edited by forever_driving on Thursday 1st July 12:42

>>> Edited by forever_driving on Thursday 1st July 12:44

KITT

5,345 posts

264 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
I've heard on Se7en (Caterham) style cars there isn't enought frontal surface to allow a laser to lock on unless they have a standard front plate.

Not sure about an Ultima, but I don't think laser cares about the material it hits as it's a type of light, so GRP will still reflect it.

I think there's a website that offers a testing facility with a laser speed gun so you could test it out?

roop

6,018 posts

307 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
You can always affix it to the back of the car. You can be LIDAR'd from both ends (excuse the expression) these days.

If a LIDA is in use on an A or B road, they might pull you in as you go past, so do't actually need to get the plate in shot. I'd put it on the front and buy a second one and stick it to the back. An Ultima has to be a major target for envious Talivan operators.

james_j

3,996 posts

278 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
I hope you don't mind my jumping in here, but I am thinking of buying one.

Does anyone know who can fit them (& test obviously) (Southern England)?

roop

6,018 posts

307 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
KITT said:
I've heard on Se7en (Caterham) style cars there isn't enought frontal surface to allow a laser to lock on unless they have a standard front plate.


I expect there's enough reflectivity from a small plate or a headlamp to get a reading.

>> Edited by roop on Thursday 1st July 13:50

DustyC

12,820 posts

277 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
headlamps.

I had ago with a laser last week (only cost me £60 and 3 points).

I couldnt believe the pin point accuracy of the aim. I dont reckon anything would get away with out being hit, even a bike.

forever_driving

Original Poster:

1,869 posts

273 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Ah

Spoke to manufacture now, seems like they can get you anywhere. So it looks as if the garage door opener will be fitted after all

BigBazza

2,135 posts

270 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Mine was used the 1st time last week, was doing late 30's in a 30 and it went mental...then I saw the Talivan...breezed past grinning...now I am the proud owner of a VERY closely watched Cerb lol

DustyC

12,820 posts

277 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Does the LRC100 fire if you are not speeding?

cptsideways

13,820 posts

275 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
I'm just sat here reading my new Kustoms Signals prolaser manual........


It says:

It's much easier to target a vehicle going away, the aquisition time is also faster.

Flat reflective surfaces are best. number plates & rear light reflectors & headlights.



Having been out for a quick test, (it arrived today) I have already discovered the following.....

Its a range finder too, however it can't see the range on dark red house bricks, roof tiles, trees, garden shed, or anything slightly organic. It likes windows, road signs & cars funnily enough.


So a sleek low car with no flat frontal areas, that's gotta be worth a try.

>> Edited by cptsideways on Thursday 1st July 14:58

trefor

14,717 posts

306 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
I want to fit one to my T350 ... unfortunately the front doesn't have a suitable gap to put the device into near the plate.

How well do you guys think it would perform if I placed the device in one of the air scoops either side of the numberplate. I think it would catch the signal as the laser was being targetted? (maybe I need a smaller front plate too ...).

Fitting one to the rear of the T350 should be easy enough - holes all over the place

forever_driving

Original Poster:

1,869 posts

273 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
cptsideways said:

So a sleek low car with no flat frontal areas, that's gotta be worth a try.



Well I've passed you phone number onto my dad, so you'll get to test it out soon enough

Tafia

2,658 posts

271 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
DustyC said:
Does the LRC100 fire if you are not speeding?


Yes.

It reacts to the incoming laser beam and
does not "know " what speed one is travelling at.

HTH

BigBazza

2,135 posts

270 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
trefor said:
I want to fit one to my T350 ... unfortunately the front doesn't have a suitable gap to put the device into near the plate.

How well do you guys think it would perform if I placed the device in one of the air scoops either side of the numberplate.


I have mine fitted in the "mouth" of my cerb right under the plate, you can't really see it which is good! The scoops on the T350 should be a good place, just get it as close to the plate as you can.

trefor

14,717 posts

306 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
I'm just sat here reading my new Kustoms Signals prolaser manual........


It says:

It's much easier to target a vehicle going away, the aquisition time is also faster.

Flat reflective surfaces are best. number plates & rear light reflectors & headlights.



Having been out for a quick test, (it arrived today) I have already discovered the following.....

Its a range finder too, however it can't see the range on dark red house bricks, roof tiles, trees, garden shed, or anything slightly organic. It likes windows, road signs & cars funnily enough.


So a sleek low car with no flat frontal areas, that's gotta be worth a try.

>> Edited by cptsideways on Thursday 1st July 14:58


Perhaps we should just grow grass over the car or cover it in something from the military stealth supplies catalogue ... a bit of Lockheed SR10 (?) paint topcoat maybe ...

roop

6,018 posts

307 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
...it can't see the range on dark red house bricks, roof tiles, trees, garden shed, or anything slightly organic.


Hrm, so I need something like this then...

cptsideways

13,820 posts

275 months

Thursday 1st July 2004
quotequote all
Perhaps just not wash your car ever, that green stuff on trees seems to work wonders...........

8Pack

5,182 posts

263 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
I'm just sat here reading my new Kustoms Signals prolaser manual........


It says:

It's much easier to target a vehicle going away, the aquisition time is also faster.

Flat reflective surfaces are best. number plates & rear light reflectors & headlights.



Having been out for a quick test, (it arrived today) I have already discovered the following.....

Its a range finder too, however it can't see the range on dark red house bricks, roof tiles, trees, garden shed, or anything slightly organic. It likes windows, road signs & cars funnily enough.


So a sleek low car with no flat frontal areas, that's gotta be worth a try.



I've Got It!!!!

Tree Bark Cladding!!!

lbir2

25 posts

264 months

Friday 2nd July 2004
quotequote all
Wonder if you can persuade the USAF to sell you some spare buckets of IR and Radar absorbant paint they use on the F117

cptsideways

13,820 posts

275 months

Sunday 11th July 2004
quotequote all
Got to test a couple westies on the weekend, according to legend they are near impossible to target so I tried it. Both had stuck on plates on the upper nose cone.

The legend is correct! could'nt get a thing on them