Police using a HGV unit...........
Police using a HGV unit...........
Author
Discussion

a4cabrio

Original Poster:

933 posts

189 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
To catch other HGV drivers not wearing seatbelts, using phone, sat nav, eating etc etc.

The police in some areas are using a unrestricted HGV tractor unit to catch out the above. They are pulling along side HGV drivers and filming them with a video camera and then a car will stop the offending truck and deal with it. A lot of this is being carried out on DCs where the HGV speed limit is a maximum 50mph, the police HGV unit is travelling at a lot more than 50 mph as most Hgv drivers will do 56 on a DC and the police unit is easily catching them up and passing if no offence witnessed.

Now my question is, can the police use a HGV unit and ignore the speed restrictions in place for that class of vehicle???

jagracer

8,248 posts

266 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
a4cabrio said:
Now my question is, can the police use a HGV unit and ignore the speed restrictions in place for that class of vehicle???
The police can ignore the speed limit in a car why would doing it in a truck be any different? Do you have a link to this info?

grumpyscot

1,293 posts

222 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
I'm sure this has been featured on one of the TV cop shows - the Scottish guy (Angus???) was an HGV driver before becoming a cop and mentioned in one of the progs that he used an unmarked HGV to catch out other HGV drivers. He's also regularly featured as being one of the few cops who can read a tacho log! IIRC his brother is also a motorway cop.


a4cabrio

Original Poster:

933 posts

189 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
jagracer said:
he police can ignore the speed limit in a car why would doing it in a truck be any different? Do you have a link to this info?
My understanding is the police can ignore the speed limit if on an emergency call, surely the police can't break speed limits on the off chance of catching someone on the phone or eating an apple.

http://www.trucknetuk.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=2&...

14-7

6,233 posts

221 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Maybe you need to read the thread that is a sticky at the top of SP&L.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

tvrgit

8,489 posts

282 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Police exemption is "for police purposes". It doesn't have to be an emergency, it doesn't need lights or sirens, it doesn't apply to certain classes of vehicle. . Just "police purposes".

anonymous-user

84 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
If the cab is plated to less than 7.5 tonnes it can legally travel at 60 mph on a DC and 70 on a Motorway.

HGV are limited to 56 but legally can do 60 on a motorway.

tvrgit

8,489 posts

282 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
billybob69 said:
If the cab is plated to less than 7.5 tonnes it can legally travel at 60 mph on a DC and 70 on a Motorway.

HGV are limited to 56 but legally can do 60 on a motorway.
If it's being used for police purpoees it can travel at any speed it can reach, on any road.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

247 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Except 88mph- you don't want to risk it going back to the future.

rewc

2,187 posts

263 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
tvrgit said:
If it's being used for police purpoees it can travel at any speed it can reach, on any road.
Yes and remember it will not be being driven by a mere mortal.

DrDeAtH

3,700 posts

262 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
grumpyscot said:
I'm sure this has been featured on one of the TV cop shows - the Scottish guy (Angus???) was an HGV driver before becoming a cop and mentioned in one of the progs that he used an unmarked HGV to catch out other HGV drivers. He's also regularly featured as being one of the few cops who can read a tacho log! IIRC his brother is also a motorway cop.
PC Angus Nairn


Traffic cops was the show IIRC...


GC8

19,910 posts

220 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
The only question that this raises for me, is whether disconnecting or bypassing the speed restrictor is lawful.

Using a mobile phone in an HGV is extremely foolish, but I wouldnt support the use of a vehicle like this if it was being used principally to nick drivers who werent wearing their seat belts.

vonhosen

40,597 posts

247 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
The only question that this raises for me, is whether disconnecting or bypassing the speed restrictor is lawful.
Police are exempt from requirement to be fitted.


GTiVR6

3,640 posts

231 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Public complaining about police catching people breaking the law. Public complain about police not catching people...

Public need to make their mind up.

tvrgit

8,489 posts

282 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
rewc said:
tvrgit said:
If it's being used for police purposes it can travel at any speed it can reach, on any road.
Yes and remember it will not be being driven by a mere mortal.
The question was "is it legal" and the answer is "yes it is". You are correct though - now that the question has been answered, it's time for the customary 17 pages of irrelevant drivel to commence.

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

228 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
billybob69 said:
If the cab is plated to less than 7.5 tonnes it can legally travel at 60 mph on a DC and 70 on a Motorway.

HGV are limited to 56 but legally can do 60 on a motorway.
Everything over 3.5 tonnes has to be limited to 56 mph (or the KM/H equivalent anyway) these days. No one would plate a cab to 7.5 tonnes, unless it was not used for towing anything, and even if they did, it'd still need to be limited. In fact, I'd be surprised if a normal tractor unit weighed significantly less than 7.5 tonnes even unladen, a tri-axle one won't).

As has been mentioned though, the police can use their exemption to allow them to do away with a limiter.

Of course, delivery drivers are allowed to travel without wearing a seatbelt when they're engaged in multi-drop operations (although that implies they must use it once they're transiting somewhere on a DC or Motorway). I always wore mine all the time, it was just force of habit, and the use of it never slowed me up anyway.

rewc

2,187 posts

263 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
Super Slo Mo said:
Everything over 3.5 tonnes has to be limited to 56 mph (or the KM/H equivalent anyway) these days.
Not exactly everything. My 4250kg Motor Caravan, tax class PHGV, is not limited at all and is legal at 70mph on the motorway. I assume you mean a commercial vehicle classification of some type or other.

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

228 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
rewc said:
Not exactly everything. My 4250kg Motor Caravan, tax class PHGV, is not limited at all and is legal at 70mph on the motorway. I assume you mean a commercial vehicle classification of some type or other.
I forget exactly, but yes probably. It was an age related thing, there was a point a few years back where all new commercials over 3.5t had to be limited from the outset. At that point, they also stopped being allowed to use the right hand lane of a motorway due to the limiter.

Vehicles from the 90's were not limited, and there was a small window during the 2000's where they weren't limited either, but without doing a bit of research, I can't recall what those dates were.

rewc

2,187 posts

263 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
DrDeAtH said:
PC Angus Nairn


Traffic cops was the show IIRC...
The man himself.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/01/12/article-...

Flawless Victory

441 posts

195 months

Sunday 24th June 2012
quotequote all
rewc said:
DrDeAtH said:
PC Angus Nairn


Traffic cops was the show IIRC...
The man himself.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/01/12/article-...
And the truck with all the tat stuck to it, he used to own....