Without Prejudice - one for Zollar?
Discussion
I had an accident a couple of months back, which although it was on a roundabout, was IMO completely the other driver's fault.
It's taken this long, but her insurers have finally agreed to pay for the repairs to my car - on a 'without prejudice' basis. My insurers are not paying for any repairs to her car. I've Googled as much as I can, and not really managed to find the answer I want.
As I understand it, a without prejudice payment assumes no liability. Is that right? If so, once my car is repaired, what happens with regards to the insurance claim and admission of liability? I don't want a fault claim on my records, nor do I want a 50/50 claim.
She drove into me, her insurers have paid for the repairs, why have they not admitted liability?
It's taken this long, but her insurers have finally agreed to pay for the repairs to my car - on a 'without prejudice' basis. My insurers are not paying for any repairs to her car. I've Googled as much as I can, and not really managed to find the answer I want.
As I understand it, a without prejudice payment assumes no liability. Is that right? If so, once my car is repaired, what happens with regards to the insurance claim and admission of liability? I don't want a fault claim on my records, nor do I want a 50/50 claim.
She drove into me, her insurers have paid for the repairs, why have they not admitted liability?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff