RE: Man trashes speed camera

RE: Man trashes speed camera

Monday 20th September 2004

Man trashes speed camera

Speed camera in Oz smashed by angry motorist


A Perth motorist has destroyed a police speed camera worth about $100,000 (about £39,000), the latest in a string of attacks in recent years on the cameras.

Police said that the man drove past the camera about 6pm, then stopped his car, produced an iron bar and then struck the machine repeatedly, which destroyed it. Police said they did not know whether or not the camera, known in Perth as a Multanova, provoked the attack by snapping him speeding.

A witness gave police the man's car registration number, and Inspector Kosovich said he expected charges would be laid when police had identified who was responsible for the attack.

Author
Discussion

speedy_thrills

Original Poster:

7,762 posts

245 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
He was going about it all wrong, what you need is: Fireworks and matches (always check with a parent to make sure matches are “safety matches”).

Step 1: Cram fireworks into any holes, crevices or in the vicinity of the “week spot” presented by the lens.

Step 2: Ignite fireworks.

Step 3: Run.

Step 4: Find another camera and repeat steps 1 through 3.

It’s very simple to do your duty as a citizen also and maintain the freedom our grandparents and great grandparents fought so hard for. “We who lie here now pass on the torch of freedom”- WW2 memorial.

Streetcop

5,907 posts

240 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Ted..?????

roadsweeper

3,786 posts

276 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Gosh, I'll be losing sleep about this tonight.

count duckula

1,324 posts

276 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Well done Mr motorist
I salute you.




Malc

blademan

493 posts

240 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
[/quote]
I don't personally condone willful destruction of scams, but I can understand where the guy is coming from. However smashing scams just gets you a record. ( Only if they catch you though )

BogBeast

1,137 posts

265 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Nah..

Prefer the 8" petrol angle grider meself.. useful for wheel clamps too..


jeremyadamson

1,872 posts

261 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Yeah, salute the motorist.....and send the boys round to the witness to beat some 'Civil Liberty' into him.

gh0st

4,693 posts

260 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
Ted..?????


jeremysmith

180 posts

274 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Smearing the lens with cow's sh1t works quite well too! I drove past one on the A422 in Farthinghoe around midnight about 12 months ago and cheered because it was burning like an olympic torch

volvod5_dude

352 posts

247 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Captain Gatso would be proud.

Mon Ami Mate

6,589 posts

270 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Am I the only person who thinks this is a complete waste of time? The camera will be replaced, at our (the taxpayer's) cost and the perpetrator risks a criminal record, large fine and prison if he gets caught. How does anybody benefit?

Destroying cameras is a waste of time, energy and money. What we need to destroy is the political climate that has allowed them to proliferate. We need to combat them with brains, not brawn.

Targarama

14,638 posts

285 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Mon Ami Mate said:
Am I the only person who thinks this is a complete waste of time? The camera will be replaced, at our (the taxpayer's) cost and the perpetrator risks a criminal record, large fine and prison if he gets caught. How does anybody benefit?

Destroying cameras is a waste of time, energy and money. What we need to destroy is the political climate that has allowed them to proliferate. We need to combat them with brains, not brawn.


That's all well and good, until you get flashed and want to remove the evidence ...

gh0st

4,693 posts

260 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
MonAmiMate -

Yes it probably will be replaced at taxpayers expense but if it wasnt then that taxpayers money would go toward yet another road safety..**sorry** speed camera going up elsewhere.

Waste as much as possible is what i say because whatever is left over will not go to schools or hospitals or even the plod on the street - it will go back into scameras because you have to spend money to make money, as the saying goes

CraigAlsop

1,991 posts

270 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
This was Perth, as in Western Australia, rather than Scotland.
Just in case you didn't notice

bad boy

821 posts

266 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
police said said:
the man drove past the camera about 6pm, then stopped his car, produced an iron bar and then struck the machine repeatedly, which destroyed it.


for some reason i find this totally hilarious

medicineman

1,731 posts

239 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Last time I was in Oz there was a big fuss after there Jeremy Clarkson equivalent had shown a device for using spray cans at a high height. The company that made said device had then sold out with 2 days of the program been aired and several hundred cameras had been "disabled"

NugentS

686 posts

249 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Well done that Man.

I approve 100%

Sean

supraman2954

3,241 posts

241 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Mon Ami Mate said:
Am I the only person who thinks this is a complete waste of time? The camera will be replaced, at our (the taxpayer's) cost and the perpetrator risks a criminal record, large fine and prison if he gets caught. How does anybody benefit?

Destroying cameras is a waste of time, energy and money. What we need to destroy is the political climate that has allowed them to proliferate. We need to combat them with brains, not brawn.
He probably didn't think it was a waste of time if he was one ping away from being banned. It that was the case with me, I could consider doing the same. His only problem was that someone grassed on him!

Mad Dave

7,158 posts

265 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
I agree with Mon Ami Mate to a degree - that is, I agree that its a waste of cash, BUT it shows the powers that be that people arent quite as happy about these cameras as they protest them to be. The only problem is that it still gets classed as being perpetrated by 'fringe groups of speed crazed motorists'.

Oh, and the guy is evidently a few cans short of a six pack of XXXX if he parked up next to the damn thing - you should at least remove your plate or park elsewhere!?

FourWheelDrift

88,822 posts

286 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
Well if the do mount them so low to the ground within easy reach the are sure to be attacked.

Anyway, that ugly little brute is surely a danger to road users, if it's hit by a car it'll go right though the windscreen and if a biker hit's it......

An unneccesary evil part of the modern lazy culture of beaurocrats who think that machines can do a better job that a human being. But then again having met some of the aforementioned lazy beaurocrats they wouldn't know what a human being was like, since they show no signs of being one themselves.