ACPO guidelines to speeding
ACPO guidelines to speeding
Author
Discussion

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Most of you will be aware, but those not, here are the guidlines:

Limit:................30 40 50 60 70

Fixed penalty: ... 35 46 57 68 79

Report to court: 50 66 76 86 96


Street

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

267 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Pops head round door, looks round, no Street...

Except Lancashire.

Up to 35 mph in a 30 - Caution. (Only one allowed in 3 year period for first speeding offence. reoffend then offer of speed awareness course.)

36/37 mph - speed awareness course.

38 mph Fixed Penalty.

.... hey up he's coming back. Grabs coat and scarpers.

DVD

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
I'm back....what did I miss?

Zod

35,295 posts

281 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
How come the report to court in a 30 is for 67% over the limit and only for 37% over the limti at 70? Whatever my view on 96 in a 70 (depends on conditions is the answer), 50 in a 30 is taking the proverbial.

Streetcop

Original Poster:

5,907 posts

261 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
I agree with you Zod...100%

cuneus

5,963 posts

265 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Yeah and there is a proposal to reduce the punishment for up to 39 in a 30

Message = OK to speed in urban areas

Just how stupid can you be ?

Zod

35,295 posts

281 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
I agree with you Zod...100%
actually, even worse, depending on the road, could be 66 in a 40. The only thing that makes me hesitate there is the number of suburban dual carriageways with 40 limits. Most of Hendon Way could at most times of day easily cope with a 50 limit for instance.

ca092003

797 posts

260 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Zod said:
50 in a 30 is taking the proverbial.


How so? If traffic is light, few pedestrians around and you can always stop safely in the distance you an see to be clear WHY is it a problem?

You can't measure a safe speed in MPH.

^Slider^

2,874 posts

272 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Its a problem because the majority of 30 limits are in town and residential areas. 50 in 30 is a mickey take, i understand what your saying regarding locations etc but nearly double the speed limit is a big no no if your anywhere near a residential area. Bear in mind a lot of people will be expecting you to be doing 30 or thereabouts before they pull out of junctions, cross the roads etc.

Gareth

catso

15,885 posts

290 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
Zod said:
How come the report to court in a 30 is for 67% over the limit and only for 37% over the limti at 70?


Indeed if the same 'leniency' were allowed on the safest roads, where there are no pedestrians and a central crash barrier, then FPN only for up to 117 mph

ben_london

174 posts

263 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
If every 30 limit was placed on a suitable 30 road then yes 50 is taking the piss. However I openly admit to doing between 55 and 60 in a 30 road near me on numerous occasions, it is very long and straight with no junctions. At night it is empty and I see no need to sit at 30 simply because a sign says so. I drive to my ability and confidence.

TripleS

4,294 posts

265 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
ben_london said:
If every 30 limit was placed on a suitable 30 road then yes 50 is taking the piss. However I openly admit to doing between 55 and 60 in a 30 road near me on numerous occasions, it is very long and straight with no junctions. At night it is empty and I see no need to sit at 30 simply because a sign says so. I drive to my ability and confidence.


I'm with you there buddy. There is a spot in our area where one can enter a 30 mph limit at 50 to 55 mph (with the speed then reducing) with no chance whatsoever of anyone coming to harm. There is very good visibility and no possibility of a pedestrian or vehicle suddenly appearing and getting in the way.

Best wishes all,
Dave.

paolow

3,261 posts

281 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
id go along with that. while im sure this makes me a criminal, ill travel not at the speed limit but at a constantly variable limit that i impose on myself dependant on conditions, traffic, familiarity, etc etc. sometimes i think 10 mph is too quick. other times 50 is too slow.
other people will travel at 30 regardless of hazards and other people will also travel at 30 at 2 am on what was a nsl but has now been pointlessly restricted. to me that seems crazy.
however, the law is the law and i wont come on here crying if (when!) i get points for following my motoring philosophy.
the trouble is that most people dont even understand indicators, let alone, anticipation, spatial awareness etc etc, which is why we are in the situation we are in.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

278 months

Monday 4th October 2004
quotequote all
A magistrate neighbour got tickled for 34, and a nearby lady was whacked for 33....both fixed cameras.

Themoss

256 posts

261 months

Tuesday 5th October 2004
quotequote all

paolow said:
the trouble is that most people dont even understand indicators, let alone, anticipation, spatial awareness etc etc, which is why we are in the situation we are in.




You have well and truly hit the nail on the head there mate for just about every speed related thread that's ever on here.

We're here because we love driving. Most of us probably have 'fast' or different cars, which we drive for enjoyment and not just to get from A to B. I personally HATE driving when i actaully have somewhere to go!

Unfortunately, the mum on the school run caning it along in her Shogun (which she bought because it "makes me feel safe"), or the local bulider in his piece of crap pick-up on the phone, do NOT enjoy driving. They are the ones who ruin it for people like us. They CANNOT be trusted to drive at an appropriate speed, raise their vision, or anticipate hazards.

99.9% of the driving public are nunpties, who have dozens of near-misses every day which they never even know about. Not necessarily their fault, there's loads of reasons, but there you have it. The public just can't be trusted to be given too much leeway with driving, because it will just be ignored and abused.

TripleS

4,294 posts

265 months

Tuesday 5th October 2004
quotequote all
Themoss said:

We're here because we love driving. Most of us probably have 'fast' or different cars, which we drive for enjoyment and not just to get from A to B. I personally HATE driving when i actaully have somewhere to go!

Unfortunately, the mum on the school run caning it along in her Shogun (which she bought because it "makes me feel safe"), or the local bulider in his piece of crap pick-up on the phone, do NOT enjoy driving. They are the ones who ruin it for people like us. They CANNOT be trusted to drive at an appropriate speed, raise their vision, or anticipate hazards.

99.9% of the driving public are nunpties, who have dozens of near-misses every day which they never even know about.


With respect Thermoss I think that's a bit of a wild statement. 99.9% nunpties? Dozens of near misses every day? In any case, it depends on what you call a near miss.

I was talking to a local IAM member some time ago and he was telling me he regularly had near misses, and apparently what he meant was drivers pulling out in front of him and people coming up behind tailgating him. I don't find myself troubled by lots of people pulling out in front of me, so I'm bound to wonder just how much of an advanced (including defensive) driver he was if he has that much difficulty.

Thermoss said:
The public just can't be trusted to be given too much leeway with driving, because it will just be ignored and abused.


No, sorry Thermoss, that really leaves too many of us with a problem we don't need and don't want. What we (or at least I) do want is a system that does give more leeway to those who can demonstrate a suitably high standard of driving. If such a system were to be introduced and well publicised I think it would help to raise the level of interest in driving and that is bound to have beneficial effects in overall safety.

I do think one of the major problems is that most people are not really interested in driving, they just get on with it without thinking properly about what they are doing. We need to counter that attitude.

Best wishes all,
Dave.

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

279 months

Tuesday 5th October 2004
quotequote all
TripleS said:
I was talking to a local IAM member some time ago and he was telling me he regularly had near misses, and apparently what he meant was drivers pulling out in front of him and people coming up behind tailgating him. I don't find myself troubled by lots of people pulling out in front of me, so I'm bound to wonder just how much of an advanced (including defensive) driver he was if he has that much difficulty.

IAM drivers have to stick to the speed limits everywhere, or slap themselves on the wrist as self-inflicted punishment (according to an IAM driver I knew). Perhaps that's why this guy is being tailgated?
TripleS said:
I do think one of the major problems is that most people are not really interested in driving, they just get on with it without thinking properly about what they are doing. We need to counter that attitude.

Correct. The roads get used by all abilities, which is why defensive driving is so important. The dangerous drivers are not those who do 90 when it's safe but who do 30 when it isn't.

blueyes

4,799 posts

275 months

Tuesday 5th October 2004
quotequote all
TripleS said:

it depends on what you call a near miss.



I suppose that's when you hit someone....... accordingly.... if you missed them.... it would be a near hit.

Funny old world.

leosayer

7,686 posts

267 months

Tuesday 5th October 2004
quotequote all
Zod said:

Streetcop said:
I agree with you Zod...100%

actually, even worse, depending on the road, could be 66 in a 40. The only thing that makes me hesitate there is the number of suburban dual carriageways with 40 limits. Most of Hendon Way could at most times of day easily cope with a 50 limit for instance.


Unless of course it's on the A12/A102 approach to Blackwall tunnell, or the A13 between Dagenham and Beckton. Both 40 limits and both routinely ignored by 99% of drivers in complete safety.

Bitter'n'twisted

595 posts

281 months

Tuesday 5th October 2004
quotequote all

Was behind a police van with "Police safety camera..." something or other written on the side a couple of days ago (ie he had been out all day busting people).

Needless to say he drove at 35 through the 30 limits and 65 through the 60 limits all the way back to his base.

Says it all really.