RE: Row brews over talivan blues and twos
RE: Row brews over talivan blues and twos
Tuesday 26th October 2004

Row brews over talivan blues and twos

Should Norfolk's camera vans be conspicuous or not?


A row is brewing in Norfolk over whether or not mobile scamera vans should be visible. According to a former head of the county's speed cameras, removing blue lights and police logos plays into the hands of those claim it's all about revenue rather than safety. This follows Norfolk police chiefs' decision that it was 'inappropriate' for talivans to carry visible insignia because they were not emergency vehicles. It's reported that the force sought legal advice after Norfolk Police Authority member Angela Jordan raised the issue.

The casualty reduction partnership member in question, who resigned after a major review of the body's operations, asked if logos and lights should not now be stripped from other non-emergency police vehicles, since they had not yet been. He said he believed that it was important for the scamera vehicles to be clearly recognisable if the body' scameras are not to be seen as a money-making venture.

Parnell reportedly wrote that, "The law states that blue lights may only be fitted to vehicles used for police purposes. That is precisely the role of the camera enforcement vans. Only the police, either officers or civilian staff operating under the delegated authority of the chief constable, can carry out speed enforcement. This, together with the prosecution process, is precisely the role of the constabulary within the partnership.

"By significantly reducing conspicuity in this way, the chief constable is playing directly into the hands of those organisations and drivers who maintain that the cameras are only deployed for revenue gathering."

There's more on this story here: http://tinyurl.com/6w3wy

Author
Discussion

cdp

Original Poster:

8,019 posts

277 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
So does that mean that if you warn motorists about a potential hazzard ahead you aren't interfering with Police business as they are not part of the police force?

deeen

6,289 posts

268 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
That van looks pretty visible to me, even without blue flashing lights.

Unless the lights are the only thing poking over the hedge, of course.

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Then again...people have whined that cameravans are dangerous as people panic brake when seeing them...

If they didn't see them, they wouldn't panic brake..

deeen

6,289 posts

268 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
Then again...people have whined that cameravans are dangerous as people panic brake when seeing them...

If they didn't see them, they wouldn't panic brake..



But then they might be doing those incredibly dangerous speeds and could die at any moment.

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
As long as the blame is appropriated to the correct driver....

mcflurry

9,184 posts

276 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
Then again...people have whined that cameravans are dangerous as people panic brake when seeing them...

If they didn't see them, they wouldn't panic brake..


and if the limits were set correctly the general public wouldn't need to brake

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
mcflurry said:

Streetcop said:
Then again...people have whined that cameravans are dangerous as people panic brake when seeing them...

If they didn't see them, they wouldn't panic brake..



and if the limits were set correctly the general public wouldn't need to brake


Poor that one, I'm afraid....Numptie brakers don't need excuses....

I've seen people brake in all sorts of speed limits...comes down to attention spans...

What was the last speed limit sign? Did I see it...or was I picking my nose?

deeen

6,289 posts

268 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:
As long as the blame is appropriated to the correct driver....


The van driver...

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
they'll do...

JMGS4

8,889 posts

293 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Row should be brewing, since when does a Dick Turpin require any blues and twos, as they're mostly illegal anyway by being operated by civvies........

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
JMGS4 said:
Row should be brewing, since when does a Dick Turpin require any blues and twos, as they're mostly illegal anyway by being operated by civvies........


The injustice of it all....

In my force, however, they are all BiB operating them..

Street

JMGS4

8,889 posts

293 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

The injustice of it all....
In my force, however, they are all BiB operating them.. Street


OK point taken, But still cannot think why they should need blues and twos.......Talivans should be driving WITHIN the limits and they certainly have no need of police lights!!!!!or sirens for that matter......

Streetcop

5,907 posts

261 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
JMGS4 said:

Streetcop said:

The injustice of it all....
In my force, however, they are all BiB operating them.. Street



OK point taken, But still cannot think why they should need blues and twos.......Talivans should be driving WITHIN the limits and they certainly have no need of police lights!!!!!or sirens for that matter......


My force doesn't have vans with blues/twos.
However, I'm all in favour of every vehicle owned by the police and driven by officers to be fitted with some sort of siren and blue light equipment..(whether overt or covert)...Simply because incidents occur, often when you're doing something else and require urgent attention. For example, I've known SOCO officers to attend at burglary in progress shouts in their white vans with no blue lights or sirens out of their duty to the public.

Street

Dibble

13,257 posts

263 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
That picture's of a Lancashire camera van.

They've all had the "Police" markings and blue lights removed. They still have blue/yellow "Battenburg" livery, and orange roof and grille lights.

jam1et

1,536 posts

275 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
As I understand it - please correct me if I'm wrong - it has already been decided that in order for cameras to improve safety they should be visible (hence the reason why all static camera boxes were painted yellow). So why should mobile units be any different? If the govmnt are to be believed and its about prevention rather than prosecution, then surely mobile units would be more effective if they were painted luminous yellow, it would be the same effect as those dyno-rod vans - you can spot them a mile off and there's no ambiguity about what it is.

I drove past a mobile camera unit recently in a line of traffic. It wasnt until we were right on top of it that we all recognised it for what it was (they are not well marked in Somerset). The bloke in front panic-braked to less than 20mph even though we were already within the speed limit. I had left a decent gap and was able to brake safely in the TVR, but the bloke behind me was about 2 inches off my bumper by the time he had realised what was going on. Promoting safety my arse......If that camera wasnt there our journey would have been much safer.

jam1et

1,536 posts

275 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Dibble said:
That picture's of a Lancashire camera van.

They've all had the "Police" markings and blue lights removed. They still have blue/yellow "Battenburg" livery, and orange roof and grille lights.


Thats all well and good but you cant see the livery if all you can see is the front of the van pointng towards you (if you're lucky, usually they're parked behind another vehicle so you cant see them at all).

deltaf

6,806 posts

276 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

mcflurry said:


Streetcop said:
Then again...people have whined that cameravans are dangerous as people panic brake when seeing them...

If they didn't see them, they wouldn't panic brake..




and if the limits were set correctly the general public wouldn't need to brake



Poor that one, I'm afraid....Numptie brakers don't need excuses....

I've seen people brake in all sorts of speed limits...comes down to attention spans...

What was the last speed limit sign? Did I see it...or was I picking my nose?


Whats speed got to do with SAFE driving?

TripleS

4,294 posts

265 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Streetcop said:

mcflurry said:


Streetcop said:
Then again...people have whined that cameravans are dangerous as people panic brake when seeing them...

If they didn't see them, they wouldn't panic brake..



and if the limits were set correctly the general public wouldn't need to brake



Poor that one, I'm afraid....Numptie brakers don't need excuses....

I've seen people brake in all sorts of speed limits...comes down to attention spans...


Well can't we simplify things and get rid of them all, so nobody gets confused?

OK, so that's not possible, so we'll compromise eh.

We'll keep advisory speed limits in built up areas and bin the rest of them.

So have we got a deal then?

Oh good, I can settle for that.

Best wishes all,
Dave.

RickH

1,711 posts

271 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
Would it be illegal in this country to follow something like in Oz? Down there the mobile scamera locations are broadcast to one and all over the airwaves of the local radio station. That way everyone will konw where the cameras are and will be aware when they round the corner.

One point to note is that by comparison these vans practically scream their purpose in your face. The Aussie system involves a small radar gun mounted on a 2ft tripod placed by the side of the road. From there the cable runs down a side street to a totally hidden operator vehicle.

It's a totally extreme system: more covert and sneaky, yet the locations are known to everyone who's got a radio turned up.

Rick

ledfoot

777 posts

275 months

Tuesday 26th October 2004
quotequote all
The Norfolk scamera vans are painted orange, and have no strobe lights or Police markings at all. definitely not at all like the one in the picture.

I should know, as I was caught doing 95mph on the A11 by one of them, and given 3 points and £60 fine.

I only slowed when I read on it, Safety Camera Partnership, but obviously I was way too slow.