Should mobile camera locations be published?
Should mobile camera locations be published?
Author
Discussion

seamus

Original Poster:

1,053 posts

311 months

Friday 26th November 2004
quotequote all
I found a list of cameras sites under the Thames Valley Saferoads website. Can any of our BIB confirm if the police are not supposed to deviate from the mobile camera sites listed or if other regions should publish their 'regular' mobile camera locations? Just curious.. Ta

>>> Edited by seamus on Friday 26th November 15:34

mcflurry

9,189 posts

282 months

Friday 26th November 2004
quotequote all
seamus said:
I found a list of cameras sites under the Thames Valley Saferoads website. Can any of our BIB confirm if the police are not supposed to deviate from the mobile camera sites listed or if other regions should publish their 'regular' mobile camera locations? Just curious.. Ta

>>> Edited by seamus on Friday 26th November 15:34


they make the rules up as they go along, then say 15% of sites can be made up too

gsx600

2,740 posts

277 months

Friday 26th November 2004
quotequote all
If you could just convert that file into a POI for my ipaq that would be most appreciated



parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Saturday 27th November 2004
quotequote all
They should run the roads covered on the radio traffic reports - not the exact position, just the road monitored. That way, everyone slows down for the entire length.

Result.

8Pack

5,182 posts

269 months

Saturday 27th November 2004
quotequote all
gsx600 said:
If you could just convert that file into a POI for my ipaq that would be most appreciated





Try: www.pocketgpsworld.com/uksafetycameras.php

destroyer

256 posts

269 months

Saturday 27th November 2004
quotequote all
All of the safety camera partnerships publish where they are going to be enforcing. I think that all have them on their websites now.
It is a good idea that they only put the road methinks as to put exactly where they are would mean that the effect is reduced as Parrot of Doom suggested above.

>> Edited by destroyer on Saturday 27th November 10:32

andytk

1,558 posts

295 months

Sunday 28th November 2004
quotequote all
destroyer said:
All of the safety camera partnerships publish where they are going to be enforcing. I think that all have them on their websites now.
It is a good idea that they only put the road methinks as to put exactly where they are would mean that the effect is reduced as Parrot of Doom suggested above.

>> Edited by destroyer on Saturday 27th November 10:32


Unfortunatley when the road in question is the Frigging M6 (ALL of it within Cumbria's cash partnerships control) it isn't particularly useful.

Andy

rodney59

424 posts

277 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
I'm trying to get a certain Partnership to tell me where they last deployed their mobile scamera at each of their sites, and they are refusing to tell me. Its not as if this is top secret information.

cptsideways

13,884 posts

281 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
rodney59 said:
I'm trying to get a certain Partnership to tell me where they last deployed their mobile scamera at each of their sites, and they are refusing to tell me. Its not as if this is top secret information.


Another few weeks & the freedom of information comes in & they can't refuse. Big problems for them if they don't comply.

Tafia

2,658 posts

277 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
destroyer said:
All of the safety camera partnerships publish where they are going to be enforcing. I think that all have them on their websites now.
It is a good idea that they only put the road methinks as to put exactly where they are would mean that the effect is reduced as Parrot of Doom suggested above.

>> Edited by destroyer on Saturday 27th November 10:32


Does this suggest a belief that "speed cameras save lives"?

Anyone looking at the stats know they most certainly don't.

jacobyte

4,768 posts

271 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
parrot of doom said:
They should run the roads covered on the radio traffic reports - not the exact position, just the road monitored. That way, everyone slows down for the entire length.

Result.


The "result" would more likely be a load of drivers looking into hedges and tiny side roads for the aforementioned camera, and then stoving into the back of someone who has stopped to turn right.

rodney59

424 posts

277 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
cptsideways said:

rodney59 said:
I'm trying to get a certain Partnership to tell me where they last deployed their mobile scamera at each of their sites, and they are refusing to tell me. Its not as if this is top secret information.



Another few weeks & the freedom of information comes in & they can't refuse. Big problems for them if they don't comply.


Interestingly they quote "very few areas of exemption"
in the FoI Act, but that the exact location of mobile scamera will be one. However "These exemptions are not always 'absolute' and many require that a Public Interest Test is applied.". In the mean time they still will not tell me pre FoI.