Help, hit by a cyclist....
Author
Discussion

Taro

Original Poster:

6 posts

256 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
I was driving up a one way single lane motorway approach road, basically a ramp with a tight radius. A cyclist in his forties comes riding down the ramp out of control on the left hand side, I try to avoid him by swerving right but he smashes into me causing £900+ damage. Police and ambulance were called. Cyclist has a broken arm but admits to police it was 'all his fault'....

Police advise they aren't going to prosecute him. I have £200 excess on my insurance policy but no protected no claims.
Insurance company advise I have to suffer losses as they can't claim off a third party. I'm a law abiding motorist who pays his bills on time and feel badly done by. He put his life and possibly others in danger but he should be ok thank goodness.

My friend suggests contacting the cyclist to ask whether he has house insurance but it's unlikely.If anyone has got any advice it would be most appreciated. Thanks.

bitwrx

1,352 posts

235 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Small claims court. A former housemate was taken to court when he rode his bike into the back of a parked car.


Dixy

3,673 posts

236 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
do you have legal protection on your insurance, if so use it to sue the cyclist, but at the end of the day you cant get blood out of a stone.

Jasandjules

72,683 posts

260 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Why is he not being prosecuted?

Aretnap

1,984 posts

182 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Taro said:
My friend suggests contacting the cyclist to ask whether he has house insurance but it's unlikely.
Why is it unlikely? I would wager that the majority of people in their 40s have some form of home and/or contents insurance, which will generally provide some form of public liability cover.

If you have his details there's nothing to stop you asking the cyclist for the money yourself, and if he doesn't pay making a claim in the small claims court. There's a risk that he wouldn't be able to pay of course, in which case you'd be wasting your time, but £900 is not a huge amount of money in the grand scheme of things and most people could probably come up with it, even if they didn't have insurance to cover it.

TwigtheWonderkid

49,263 posts

181 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
His lack of insurance does not effect his liability, although it may effect your ability to get money from him. Speak to your insurer telling them you are going to take him to small claims court to recover your excess, and ask if they want you to add their outlay (your repairs) onto the action. Then get on with it. £900 isn't a huge amount of money, so he will probably manage to pay somehow.

Snowboy

8,028 posts

182 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Why is he not being prosecuted?
Why should he be prosecuted?
People in cars have accidents and crash every day without being prosecuted.


Jasandjules

72,683 posts

260 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
Jasandjules said:
Why is he not being prosecuted?
Why should he be prosecuted?
People in cars have accidents and crash every day without being prosecuted.
Because if a car had done that they would be prosecuted.

Slidingpillar

761 posts

167 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Don't assume he's got no insurance and start off by contacting him for details of his insurer just as you would if it was a car.

Members of the Cyclists Touring Club, and the London Cycling Campaign have third party insurance as part of their membership. Other cycling clubs may also offer this benefit, but those two I know about as I'm a member of the CTC and live fairly close to London.

robinessex

12,044 posts

212 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Snowboy said:
Jasandjules said:
Why is he not being prosecuted?
Why should he be prosecuted?
People in cars have accidents and crash every day without being prosecuted.
Because if a car had done that they would be prosecuted.
Nope. As long as no injuries, and details have been exchanged, the police aren't interested, unless some (serious) aspect of bad driving come into it.

Spitfire2

1,968 posts

217 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
robinessex said:
Jasandjules said:
Snowboy said:
Jasandjules said:
Why is he not being prosecuted?
Why should he be prosecuted?
People in cars have accidents and crash every day without being prosecuted.
Because if a car had done that they would be prosecuted.
Nope. As long as no injuries, and details have been exchanged, the police aren't interested, unless some (serious) aspect of bad driving come into it.
Pretty sure driving wrong way down a single lane sliproad would be considered bad driving. maybe?

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

188 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
You need to pursue him personally for the repair costs.


shovelheadrob

1,564 posts

202 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Spitfire2 said:
robinessex said:
Jasandjules said:
Snowboy said:
Jasandjules said:
Why is he not being prosecuted?
Why should he be prosecuted?
People in cars have accidents and crash every day without being prosecuted.
Because if a car had done that they would be prosecuted.
Nope. As long as no injuries, and details have been exchanged, the police aren't interested, unless some (serious) aspect of bad driving come into it.
Pretty sure driving wrong way down a single lane sliproad would be considered bad driving. maybe?
Shirley it would be in contravention of Motorway regulations.

Randy Winkman

22,787 posts

220 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
robinessex said:
Jasandjules said:
Snowboy said:
Jasandjules said:
Why is he not being prosecuted?
Why should he be prosecuted?
People in cars have accidents and crash every day without being prosecuted.
Because if a car had done that they would be prosecuted.
Nope. As long as no injuries, and details have been exchanged, the police aren't interested, unless some (serious) aspect of bad driving come into it.
When I was injured on my bicycle and the police confirmed the same day that it was 100% the car driver's fault (for reversing off a driveway into me) - they still didn't get prosecuted. And I had a dislocated shoulder and broken ribs. So even injuries don't necessarily make a prosecution likely.

LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
What difference would a prosecution make to you getting your £900 back?

Aretnap

1,984 posts

182 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
What difference would a prosecution make to you getting your £900 back?
It would mean the cyclist gets fined, so he'd have less money with which to repay the £900.

kowalski655

15,237 posts

174 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
If successful a prosecution would go a long way to confirm liability should the cyclist try to deny fault.
don't discount the possibility of him claiming otherwise and suing for his injuries.

theshrew

6,008 posts

215 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Many moons ago I had a kid come out of a alley straight into my car. It damaged every panel down the N/S.

I picked him and his bike up and drove him home. I got some quotes to repair the car and his parents claimed off I'm pretty certain was the house insurance. ( god knows how )

Anyway within a few weeks the insurance company sent me a cheque to get my car done.

Hol

9,316 posts

231 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all

Double standards from the cycling community again......




thetrash

1,860 posts

237 months

Saturday 26th April 2014
quotequote all
Hol said:
Double standards from the cycling community again......
Can you point them out?