The spread of 20 mph zones
Author
Discussion

johnfm

Original Poster:

13,751 posts

281 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Quite a few streets near me have now been changed from 30 mph to 20 mph zones. Some quite validly in respect of proximity to school gates etc. Others not so much.

I assume the local authority set these without any consultation with residents etc.


Aviz

1,669 posts

200 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Yep. Seemingly in the last week here .. every single side road has a new set of 20mph signs. There's hundreds of them . We don't have any signage round here aside from the street names and now all of a sudden there's loads.

Edited by Aviz on Monday 26th May 10:41

Martin4x4

6,506 posts

163 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all

They are like a plague popping up all over the place here in Hull seemingly without notice or consultation.

All the national speed limit A/B roads in the East Riding around the city are turning in 30/40 zones as well.

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
What's the big deal about driving at 20 in built up areas? A 20 mph limit seems to me to make sense on streets with houses, shops, parked cars and so on. We have got used to 30, but that was a limit plucked arbitrarily from the air back when there was less traffic and cars didn't all weigh 947 tons. Hoon outside town.

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

188 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Always seemed pointless to me, no one else seems to abide by them (I do, secondly because there are speed bumps and I like having teeth and suspension) given the mere inches people hang off your bumper if you dare to do 20mph.

I wish my street was a 20mph zone given the number of kids on bikes that seem oblivious to road safety but even if it was people would still no doubt complete the course in only 12 parsecs.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

229 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
What's the big deal about driving at 20 in built up areas? A 20 mph limit seems to me to make sense on streets with houses, shops, parked cars and so on. We have got used to 30, but that was a limit plucked arbitrarily from the air back when there was less traffic and cars didn't all weigh 947 tons. Hoon outside town.
All limits were plucked arbitrarily from the air when cars had stty tires and stty brakes and folded up like coke cans when they hit something. Given the trend in KSIs and accident rates they should surely go up by that argument wink
It wouldn't be a big deal if there was a sensible attitude being applied, instead of just constantly ratcheting the limit down everywhere. 30 down to 20 here, a 60 down to 50 there, a 70 down to 60 there. Boiling frogs....

Matthen

1,459 posts

182 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Whats the deal with 20 rather than 30? It costs me money - sat in second as opposed to 3rd. It takes me longer to get anywhere - even in the middle of the night (1/3 longer across the city) and it removes the speed differential between cars and bikes - which is irritating and dangerous.

35 in town would be my ideal limit - bottom of 4th gear, decent progress, slow enough that you can see hazards developing well in advance and fast enough to teach children to respect the difference between the play ground and the road - like I was, as a kid.

HootersGsy

738 posts

167 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
Always seemed pointless to me, no one else seems to abide by them (I do, secondly because there are speed bumps and I like having teeth and suspension) given the mere inches people hang off your bumper if you dare to do 20mph.

I wish my street was a 20mph zone given the number of kids on bikes that seem oblivious to road safety but even if it was people would still no doubt complete the course in only 12 parsecs.
Only 12 parsecs? That's one LONG 20mph zone.

TwigtheWonderkid

49,247 posts

181 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Probably will get my PH membership cancelled, but I have no problem with 20mph limits in built up areas. Don't see what the fuss is all about.

MrBarry123

6,109 posts

152 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Matthen said:
Whats the deal with 20 rather than 30? It costs me money - sat in second as opposed to 3rd. It takes me longer to get anywhere - even in the middle of the night (1/3 longer across the city) and it removes the speed differential between cars and bikes - which is irritating and dangerous.

35 in town would be my ideal limit - bottom of 4th gear, decent progress, slow enough that you can see hazards developing well in advance and fast enough to teach children to respect the difference between the play ground and the road - like I was, as a kid.
You mean you think you'd have enough time to see hazards?

And is that all hazards i.e. spanning from a tentative learner pulling out of a side-street 50m in front of you to a child running out in front of the car a mere 10m in front of you?

Thinking about roads I know which have 20mph limits in place, 35mph would be too fast to be driving safely along, regardless of how God like you are as a driver.

Dave Hedgehog

16,371 posts

235 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
y but even if it was people would still no doubt complete the course in only 12 parsecs.
But surely a parsec is a unit of distance not time smile

Who me ?

7,455 posts

243 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
GrumpyTwig said:
.

I wish my street was a 20mph zone given the number of kids on bikes that seem oblivious to road safety but even if it was people would still no doubt complete the course in only 12 parsecs.
Option is yours,and others. The 30 is a limit, not a target. If there's lots of hazards, slow down. Folk hanging on to your bumper- slow down. The problem is that we're now getting a looney backlash to those that see a 30 limit and drive to it when it's obviously not safe. My street is a 20, but most times during the day the kids are out in force treating it as a play street, so 20 is IMHO,way too fast given the volume of parked cars, the gap between due to the street being narrow.

Martin_Hx

4,029 posts

229 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Is blanket limits which annoy me and in some places with parked cars and kids I.would be doing 20mph even if it was 30, unfortunately most people are feckwits who can't engage their brain.

The police have apparently enforced this road below which is 20 but really shouldn't be, the times I've done 20 on it I've been overtaken...

Hope the link works using my phone!

http://maps.gstatic.com/m/streetview/?layer=c&...

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

286 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Probably will get my PH membership cancelled, but I have no problem with 20mph limits in built up areas. Don't see what the fuss is all about.
Because it's an arse at 3 o'clock in the morning or any other time when no-one's around.

Observe a current 30 limit. Where 20mph is necessary, most drivers are doing 20, even though the limit is 30.

The ones who aren't will not be persuaded to reduce their speed by a sign on a pole.

Therefore is pointless, unless you consider making councillors feel important is important.

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

217 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
What's the big deal about driving at 20 in built up areas? A 20 mph limit seems to me to make sense on streets with houses, shops, parked cars and so on. We have got used to 30, but that was a limit plucked arbitrarily from the air back when there was less traffic and cars didn't all weigh 947 tons. Hoon outside town.
When people keep getting knocked over, 10 limits will be next.

Red Devil

13,530 posts

239 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
When people keep getting knocked over, 10 limits will be next.
That's a bit OTT. We should revert to the Locomotives on Highways Act 1896 - 14mph.
At certain times of the day you'll find it hard to go that fast on the M25...

anonymous-user

85 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
GrumpyTwig said:
y but even if it was people would still no doubt complete the course in only 12 parsecs.
But surely a parsec is a unit of distance not time smile
Not been out much since 1977, then?

(AKA Parrots innnn spaaaaaaaaaaaace)

herewego

8,814 posts

244 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Martin_Hx said:
Is blanket limits which annoy me and in some places with parked cars and kids I.would be doing 20mph even if it was 30, unfortunately most people are feckwits who can't engage their brain.

The police have apparently enforced this road below which is 20 but really shouldn't be, the times I've done 20 on it I've been overtaken...

Hope the link works using my phone!

http://maps.gstatic.com/m/streetview/?layer=c&...
There are stops from the park directly onto that road without a pavement. If the LA had any money they should be moving those steps.

anonymous-user

85 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Or (radical proposal), drivers could use skill and judgment and anticipate possible hazards as they drive through urban spaces. That, or "the Council should fix this, that, the other, and everything". I know which option I refer.

EmmaJ

4,525 posts

177 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Completely stupid and a waste of time!

30 limits are just that, it isn't the minimum speed one must be travelling at but the maximum. It's down to the driver to decide if that's appropriate or not and slow down if necessary rolleyes

The nannying and dumbing down in this country is getting ridiculous.