news this morning - annoying
news this morning - annoying
Author
Discussion

bryan35

Original Poster:

1,906 posts

270 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
Mr Greenpeace man - 'they are wanting to build another motorway, which of course means more traffic and more CO2 emmisions'
Reporter - 'most CO2 emmisions are from the exhausts of motor cars'

so, getting cars moving increases polution - erm...no.

And central heating systems don't produce any CO2 then.


The report also cuts to shots of an old F reg Volvo belching s**t out of it's exhaust pipe.

Journalists have a habit of doing this, just like on council estates when they always ask the pram pushing 16 year old smoking chav for her opinions, instead of the majority of decent folks.

makes me mad.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
IIRC, cows farts produce more CO2 than cars.

jacobyte

4,768 posts

271 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
<< 'they are wanting to build another motorway, which of course means more traffic and more CO2 emmisions' >>

Fallacy. It means less traffic in the towns, as the cars are now in the motorway. Which is less pollution.

Do these advisors appoint themselves? Why are there no intelligent, level-minded advisors?

WildCat

8,369 posts

272 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
I did not hear this news .... but yesterday on R2's "Drive Time" mit Johnny Walker (who has passed anti-scam remarks in past .... und was particularly scathing over one in Brighton which was a particularly high earner ...) -- his business news bit contained item about the "M4 Relief Road" which is going to be our first GPS toll road. Plans are afoot to use the 14 mile stretch and use GPS to log each drive und then bill you each time you use it....

Cannot see how this can be correct .... your vehicle will need a gadget to be tracked by the satellite...surely.... Or are they now planning to have speed cams in space

The loveable Johnny Walker was scathing ... you could hear a controlled anger about motorists being hounded in his voice!

IOLAIRE

1,293 posts

267 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
jacobyte said:
<< 'they are wanting to build another motorway, which of course means more traffic and more CO2 emmisions' >>

Do these advisors appoint themselves?


Yes.

alfaman

6,416 posts

263 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
jacobyte said:
<< 'they are wanting to build another motorway, which of course means more traffic and more CO2 emmisions' >>

Fallacy. It means less traffic in the towns, as the cars are now in the motorway. Which is less pollution.

Do these advisors appoint themselves? Why are there no intelligent, level-minded advisors?


you also get a BIG reduction in deaths / accidents / children being run down in town centres etc etc.

MilnerR

8,273 posts

287 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
Yes, because if they build more roads we'll all go out and buy 10 cars each and drive them all at once in order to fill up the extra road space...

mutt k

3,964 posts

267 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
IOLAIRE said:

jacobyte said:
<< 'they are wanting to build another motorway, which of course means more traffic and more CO2 emmisions' >>

Do these advisors appoint themselves?



Yes.


Did you ever get your Genesis site up and running?

james_j

3,996 posts

284 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
MilnerR said:
Yes, because if they build more roads we'll all go out and buy 10 cars each and drive them all at once in order to fill up the extra road space...


MMMM that could happen.

Apache

39,731 posts

313 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
MilnerR said:
Yes, because if they build more roads we'll all go out and buy 10 cars each and drive them all at once in order to fill up the extra road space...



yes and the problem is?

Tafia

2,658 posts

277 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
IIRC, cows farts produce more CO2 than cars.


You may find that is methane..........comes out of both ends.............


Of course some of the CO2 that comes out of the back of cars has gone in at the front...

We live in crazy times...........

MilnerR

8,273 posts

287 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
Apache, if we all drove 2 seaters, which are smaller and lighter, it would not only mean less congestion but also less wear and tear on our roads.


TAX BREAKS FOR SPORTSCARS

MrsMiggins

2,867 posts

264 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
On the same note

TAX EXEMPTION FOR MOTORCYCLES

turbobloke

117,176 posts

289 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
Tafia said:
Of course some of the CO2 that comes out of the back of cars has gone in at the front...We live in crazy times...........
Sure do, carbon dioxide is a non-issue, see the scientific evidence on this for yourself courtesy of the ABD website. Executive summary:

"This finding confirms that CO2 is not the forcing that drives the climatic system"

ratpit

229 posts

265 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
Ban trees!! Ooozes oodles of CO2 by day, but gets all guilty and makes up for its woody naughtiness by oozing oodles of O2 by night. Or is it the other way around?? I didn't pay attention in Blodgy as the girl in the front row had a big chest, sorry.

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Friday 10th December 2004
quotequote all
My car's emissions are quite low.



On the other hand, the coal wood and smokeless fuel emissions from my open fireplace are quite high. But it, its nicer than central heating

wedg1e

27,038 posts

294 months

Friday 10th December 2004
quotequote all
MrsMiggins said:
On the same note

TAX EXEMPTION FOR MOTORCYCLES


When I rode bikes, there almost WAS tax exemption. My 400cc Suzi cost £12 a YEAR to tax. Then one Budget, when the then-resident joker proclaimed from the rooftops that car tax would not increase, he quietly TRIPLED the road tax on bikes.

Bastards.