Why didn't my snooper detect a following cop car?
Why didn't my snooper detect a following cop car?
Author
Discussion

joelk

Original Poster:

175 posts

285 months

Wednesday 8th December 2004
quotequote all
Hi there,


I recently got pulled for 86 in a 70 (on an empty dual carriage way - so shoot me, I know...).

My snooper was on, and didn't detect a thing. I was followed by an un-marked police car who were "monitoring my speed on their computer, showing that I was doing 86 mph for 16 seconds".

Are there any devices that offer complete protection?

What was the device that they might have used on me?

Any educated guesses appreciated.

Thanks, Joel.

PS - It was on a road trip across Northen Ireland, so the points don't carry across... Result !

gone

6,649 posts

292 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Your snoper works on radar or similar waves

Your snooper will not detect te fact a Police car is following you and they are watching the speedo in front of the Police driver which is calibrated or the VASCAR or Police Pilot system in the car.

These devices which you attach to your dashboard to warn you of impending NIP's only work if a lazer or radar beam is sent in your direction.

As far as I am aware, snoopers cannot detect eyes watching you , yet! .

lanciachris

3,357 posts

270 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
dumbest post ever.

towman

14,938 posts

268 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
joelk said:
I was followed by an un-marked police car.........Are there any devices that offer complete protection?


Interior Mirror?

Mon Ami Mate

6,589 posts

297 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
joelk said:
Hi there,


I recently got pulled for 86 in a 70 (on an empty dual carriage way - so shoot me, I know...).

My snooper was on, and didn't detect a thing. I was followed by an un-marked police car who were "monitoring my speed on their computer, showing that I was doing 86 mph for 16 seconds".

Are there any devices that offer complete protection?

What was the device that they might have used on me?

Any educated guesses appreciated.

Thanks, Joel.

PS - It was on a road trip across Northen Ireland, so the points don't carry across... Result !


Mk1 eyeball. Don't forget to switch it on.

harrow_chim

514 posts

312 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Mon Ami Mate said:



Mk1 eyeball. Don't forget to switch it on.


More importantly switch on the data processing unit connected to Mk1 eyeball!

cptsideways

13,884 posts

281 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Some boffin bloke said said:
The policeman following you will use a system of light refraction from the car being followed, the retinal receivers of a trained officer then computate the data through the data recognition system. A complicated process then ensues which decides if the velocity of said vehicle is beyond that required. The retinal receivers are then directed to the onboard velocity determination device in said follwoing vehicle & this data is referred back to the computational device, if the data exceeds the quoted velicity numeric of the road your on, another computational process is made within the police device to make a motor nuerological movement to intercept an electronic button that acuates the blue optical sensory overload devices attatched to said police vehicle. At this point it is normally expected that the sensory overload of the pursued vehicle occupant causes an ass clenching sensation in the buttocks region & a rapid decline in vehicle velocity to a place of sanctuary. Followed by grovelling to the operator of the sensory overload vehicle that the detected velocity was not what the computational device calculated


fish

4,063 posts

311 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Unfortunately my Mk1 Eyeball now needs the optical enhancement system, a bit annoying to maintain with the regular visits to Specsavers.

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Serious question, because I didn't know this before you lot take the piss.

If the plod is following you do they not have any other system of veryfying their speed compared to yours. I admit their speedo has a calibration certificate but their eyeball certainly doesn't.

If not I would be will to challenge the assertion that an eyeball could be precise enough to gauge 1mph closing speed over 16 seconds.

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Julian64 said:
Serious question, because I didn't know this before you lot take the piss.

If the plod is following you do they not have any other system of veryfying their speed compared to yours. I admit their speedo has a calibration certificate but their eyeball certainly doesn't.

If not I would be will to challenge the assertion that an eyeball could be precise enough to gauge 1mph closing speed over 16 seconds.

VASCAR. Times you over the marks on the road that are placed there precisely for that very purpose.

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
pdV6 said:

Julian64 said:
Serious question, because I didn't know this before you lot take the piss.

If the plod is following you do they not have any other system of veryfying their speed compared to yours. I admit their speedo has a calibration certificate but their eyeball certainly doesn't.

If not I would be will to challenge the assertion that an eyeball could be precise enough to gauge 1mph closing speed over 16 seconds.


VASCAR. Times you over the marks on the road that are placed there precisely for that very purpose.


Ooopps, thanks, obviously didn't know what vascar was. I thought it was their speedo connected to a forward facing distance detection device.

joelk

Original Poster:

175 posts

285 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
MY FELLOW PISTON-HEADERS...


1. The cop car & police were both UNMARKED. No amount of Mk1 eyeball (which was already well used) would have been effective.

2. There was an onboard computer fitted in the cop car (where the stereo would normally go) which was seperate to the normal speedo. Presumably, this is connected to a device which was tracking / aimed at my car?

If so, what is this device and how can it be combatted?

As previously stated, EDUCATED opinons appreciated please!

gh0st

4,693 posts

287 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Vascar is passive hence you wont be able to detect it.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
Or.... and I may get shot down by the but the mile markers at the side of the road and a watch!

joelk

Original Poster:

175 posts

285 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
FYI...

Just read this on the VASCAR website !

Buggers eh?

Come on fellas... someone out there should detect a new jammer for this !


Theory of operation - VASCAR-plus® is a programmed computer that measures speed, by dividing distance traveled by the time it took to travel the distance.

The device, which is the size of a small radio, may be mounted in the police car, motorcycle or airplane. When the suspected speeder's car passes a point determined by the officer he flips a switch.

When the suspect's car passes another point, the officer turns the switch off. Elapsed time is automatically recorded by the computer. The officer measures the distance by throwing a switch when his car passes the first point and turning it off when his car passes the second point. The police car is used only to measure distance and its speed is not a factor in determining whether or not the suspect is speeding.

Because VASCAR-plus® computes speed simply by dividing the distance traveled by the elapsed time, it can be used in a wide variety of situations. And because it measures average speed and requires no depth perception judgments, it is fairer to the driver than other forms of speed measurement.

Today's speeders are even better equipped to avoid detection than law enforcement officers are to catch them. Undetectable RADAR detectors, RADAR jammers and cloaking devices have made the job much harder. The advanced micro processor technology of VASCAR-plus® cannot be located by radar detectors nor can it be jammed.



kenp

654 posts

277 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
There's your answer. Resort to time travel and you've got them licked.

Julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
You mean the computer with the big impressive vascar name is actually a stopwatch . Wonder how much the police got charged for that state of the art computer system.

ca092003

797 posts

266 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
I think it is a total myth to suggest that you can't spot unmarked cars, even at night, IF you know what you are looking for.

No Discretion

655 posts

261 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
ca092003 said:
I think it is a total myth to suggest that you can't spot unmarked cars, even at night, IF you know what you are looking for.


Sir,

Many of the vehicles in our fleet don't have the usual aerial farm on the roof. The new Tetra radio has meant only 1 or 2 aerials are required and these are quite small.

Only vehicles with 'Tracker' detecting equipment will have the four aerials in a square formation.

Apart from S60,V70s, our fleet also contains unmarked Honda Accord, BMW 3 Series and Skoda Octavia.

The 'new' uniform of black fleeces with the epaulette on the chest, also means identification of the occupants is fairly difficult too; especially if one is exceeding the speed limit.

lanciachris

3,357 posts

270 months

Thursday 9th December 2004
quotequote all
No Discretion said:

The 'new' uniform of black fleeces with the epaulette on the chest, also means identification of the occupants is fairly difficult too; especially if one is exceeding the speed limit.


Yes, because the speed one if travelling is directly proportional to the amount they can see...

Question that has probably already been answered in those previous posts : what if the police car travels a different amount of distance to the target?