Double tap in Cumbria; Light Wildcat and step back
Double tap in Cumbria; Light Wildcat and step back
Author
Discussion

No Discretion

Original Poster:

655 posts

261 months

philthy

4,697 posts

269 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Just vindicates what wildy has been saying.

Still, at least they got themselves in the news, and appealed to the sheep that read their propaganda

of course, there will be a massive drop in the number of accidents, as there has been since they started

Phil

gh0st

4,693 posts

287 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Well its obviously not about the money....

targarama

14,785 posts

312 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
I never liked visiting Cumbria anyway. Obviously as a driver of a fast car I'm too dangerous to visit anyway. Forgetting the fact that people who can afford fast cars have a disposable income which could prop up the local economy. Never mind, lots of nicer places to visit anyway (we went to the Lake District once and couldn't see what all the fuss was about - nothing special IMO).

d-man

1,019 posts

274 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
They'll have difficulty making their 2 separate offences stand up in court... Relying on people just paying up as usual, but hopefully getting pinged twice within seconds and ending up with a £120 fine and 6 points will annoy people enough to try and challenge it.

cuneus

5,963 posts

271 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Gary

Fatalities for Cumbria have already exceeded the figure for last year

QED they must be working

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

285 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Steve Callaghan said:
He said: "What we really want to do is increase the deterrent effect and make sure if people see a camera they actually adjust their behaviour throughout their journey and not just at accident hotspots.

But I thought that these "hotspots" were where the accidents happened? So away from them the roads are by definition safer? So why the sudden insistence that speed is now dangerous everywhere, even where no accidents have happened? There's some illogical thinking going on here.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
"Doctor, my patient is mildly ill."

"What we need is a course of blood letting"

"Doctor, it's not working and he's getting worse now"

"Well you obviously need to let more blood"

"Doctor, it's still not working. Everyone else is saying you have got the diagnosis wrong"

"You fool, you obviously didn't let enoough blood, quick, let some more"

"Doctor, the patient is dead"

"Oh shit"

supraman2954

3,241 posts

268 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
If the government put the same effort into curing diseases and terminal illnesses (pro-rata with number of casualties/fatalities), we would all be immortal and have eternal youth.

Nice to see them get their priorities right

Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
BliarOut said:
"Doctor, my patient is mildly ill."

"What we need is a course of blood letting"

"Doctor, it's not working and he's getting worse now"

"Well you obviously need to let more blood"

"Doctor, it's still not working. Everyone else is saying you have got the diagnosis wrong"

"You fool, you obviously didn't let enoough blood, quick, let some more"

"Doctor, the patient is dead"

"Oh shit"
Yopu go t the doctor's last line wrong It should be "So, that proves that my approach was correct."

g_attrill

9,037 posts

275 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
There's been some interesting discussion on the CSCP forum over the past few days. The long and short of it is that CSCP don't know what they're doing and in my opinion they have been given duff advice.

I commented that they should put FOUR vans in a line and then ban every car that they catch speeding!

This link takes you to his announcement:
www.cumbriasafetycameras.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=743&view=findpost&p=14009

Gareth

sparkythecat

8,097 posts

284 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
d-man said:
They'll have difficulty making their 2 separate offences stand up in court... Relying on people just paying up as usual, but hopefully getting pinged twice within seconds and ending up with a £120 fine and 6 points will annoy people enough to try and challenge it.


I agree, surely if you drive for 2 miles at a consistent 10mph over the posted limit you only commit one continuous offence of speeding?.

bryan35

1,906 posts

270 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Humberside police do this already on the A63.
Certainly swells the coffers.

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
ffs, I'm sick and tired of the BBC creating the impression that speeding and deaths are always directly linked, so I have complained about this.

Parrot said:
I wish to complain about this story. The wording creates a non-existant link between the 50 road deaths, and speeding. It allows the reader to presumet that the two are directly linked, when no information is presented as to the true cause of these accidents (only a percentage of which will be speed related). This is not balanced reporting of the news, and I would suggest that in future you refrain from presenting deaths and speeding as always being directly linked.


I suggest anybody who feels the same way complains using the form here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs/hi/newsid_3950000/newsid_3955200/3955223.stm

>> Edited by parrot of doom on Thursday 23 December 19:42

Mad Moggie

618 posts

270 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Of course it is about money ....accidents occur up here ... but would say good many not speed related.


The A74 pile-up (yesterday) .. bad weather conditions - ungritted roads and high winds - were more than likely the main cause here.... and the road was closed because of chemical leakage.

Then there are deaths which occur because we have some dangerous bends here and the skills to deal with this are just not taught.

Other deaths .. poor visibility at certain road junctions, tired drivers, boy racers and some drink driving offences.

Speed is not the casue per se .. and Callaghan knows this deep down .. but he needs those vans for his income and business plans .. he was not copping enough people.

Yes .. my wife will be on sooner of later .. but she is busy in kitchen and making all those feminine last minute touches for a family party ....

But if you want to see a really wild pussy cat in action take a peek at the "cycling plus forum" where I can guarantee you will be splitting your sides. Her sister decided to go a -hunting.... posting as "Nice Tame ;rofl: Cat ...

Oh dear! I need a lie down!

ratpit

229 posts

265 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH !!!!!!!!!!

I can think of no other comment that Ted would not delete. idiots!!

So if I nick a video and go back in for the tele did I burgle the house twice???????

kevinday

13,833 posts

309 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
ratpit said:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH !!!!!!!!!!

I can think of no other comment that Ted would not delete. idiots!!

So if I nick a video and go back in for the tele did I burgle the house twice???????



Yes (if you left the house and then returned)! But if you were filmed entering the living room from the hallway at 23.30 and then leaving it at 23.40 you would only be charged for one burglary.

8Pack

5,182 posts

269 months

Friday 24th December 2004
quotequote all
Been thinking, Many people think as I do, that the lake district is too overcrowded to visit. too many double yellows, parking fees that you need a mortgage for, overpriced, and now this. Well that should solve the problem of overcrowding Steve!
P.S. Er, you have told the business community in the area haven't you? .......Steve?

ylee coyote

420 posts

265 months

Friday 24th December 2004
quotequote all
agree, surely if you drive for 2 miles at a consistent 10mph over the posted limit you only commit one continuous offence of speeding?. agree, surely if you drive for 2 miles at a consistent 10mph over the posted limit you only commit one continuous offence of speeding?.

as far as I understand it yes...

but reading between the lines I thimk they are after the "I have spotted one so it must be ok to speed now"

but this is very naive thinking
if you spot one you will spot 2

t0sspots

james_j

3,996 posts

284 months

Friday 24th December 2004
quotequote all
This quote for me epitomises the childish, simplistic and pathetic way the camera representatives attempt to create a link between velocity and accidents:

"...More than 50 people die on Cumbria's roads every year and police are determined to cut the toll by getting tough on speeding motorists..."

I mean, where's the connection between the deaths and "speeding motorists"?

..and it's interesting to see Callaghan spouting the rest of his usual nonsense. A pity he couldn't answer the many points raised with him on both this site and even his own site forum.

When finally the questions put to him were too much, he simply disappeared from this site and on his own site's forum he "reserved his right to remain silent"!