Refusing To Name Someone Wanted By Police.
Refusing To Name Someone Wanted By Police.
Author
Discussion

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

163 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Sounds a big deal but it's far from it.

My cousin's son is a smart lad. He's a first class honours graduate in Aeronautical Engineering and currently doing his masters specialising in rocket propulsion systems. He has been security cleared and has been offered a position with ........ (not at liberty to disclose)

Last week he was on his way home from uni when he found himself in a train carriage full of football supporters in Chelsea fan mode. A fellow passenger complained about the fans' behaviour and at a station on route the train was boarded by the police and all the young males on board were hauled off, the innocent as well as the guilty.

As my cousin was interviewed on the platform by an officer and giving his details a fellow student on another carriage shouted out the window "That's it Chris, tell them you're a fking rocket scientist!!!" as the train pulled off.

Cops asked my relation who was that who shouted to which he dutifully replied (even good students from good families know you never grass)"haven't a clue".

Guess who, out of all the neds and hooligans present, was the only individual to end up back at the station.

He was questioned and left alone in the interview room for periods time then re-questioned a number of times (and questioned with a degree of menace) by officers very keen to know who had shouted from the train. He was threatened with a whole load of charges along the lines of obstructing an investigation and perverting the course of justice. He stood by his initial line that he didn't know who had shouted and was eventually released without charge. BiBs have told him, however, that the matter is far from over.

Are the cops just messing with him because he wouldn't give up his mate (I know they really don't take to defiance) or could he be hauled in again for further harassment?

Is one "fking" shouted out loud really worth that level of police effort?


photosnob

1,339 posts

149 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
In England it didn't happen like that...

For a start if they wanted to mess him up hed be bailed not nfa'd. In my experience it's rare to not charge or bail unless things are all tied up and finished.

If he's annoyed about it go and complain to the ipcc. They won't do anything but it looks bad in the statistics.

Edited by photosnob on Thursday 19th February 18:35

agtlaw

7,417 posts

237 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
In this country, there is no obligation to speak to the police - either as a witness, or as a suspect.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
....police not your mate....lawyer up....Feds....corrupt....tenuous link from 1675....out of order....catching burglers....say nothing.....lawyer up....complain....lawyer up.....

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

163 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
photosnob said:
In England it didn't happen like that...


Edited by photosnob on Thursday 19th February 18:35
The word "ned" should give that one away.

Tannedbaldhead said:
)



all the neds and hooligans present,


stewy68

1,826 posts

274 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
If he wants to take it further, then IPCC all the way, the most unbiased option IMO.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

189 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
.......lawyer up............say nothing.....lawyer up....complain....lawyer up.....
Are those not his rights? Would you deny them to him?

mph1977

12,467 posts

199 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
In this country, there is no obligation to speak to the police - either as a witness, or as a suspect.
however it is pertinent to point out that adverse inference may be drawn from failing to answer .

Bigends

6,193 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
agtlaw said:
In this country, there is no obligation to speak to the police - either as a witness, or as a suspect.
however it is pertinent to point out that adverse inference may be drawn from failing to answer .
But not as a witness..which he seems to have been

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

163 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
....police not your mate....lawyer up....Feds....corrupt....tenuous link from 1675....out of order....catching burglers....say nothing.....lawyer up....complain....lawyer up.....
bks! Plod have always been like that with young neds, those suspected of being neds and young lads caught up in the periphery of neddish behaviour. Take it on the chin unless they pursue the matter further.
I bet he wasn't under arrest but at the station voluntarily helping police with inquiries. That used to be how they pissed about with me when I was young. I'd get stopped and told I didn't have to go with them though it'd be in my interests if I did. At the station they'd put me in an unlocked interview room. I'd be there all night. Every now and again an officer would stick his head through the door to let me know the BiB dealing with me was busy but would get to me as soon as he was available. Then at the end of his shift they'd send me home.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
Are those not his rights? Would you deny them to him?
I don't believe the words lawyer up, or Feds come under your "rights", so no.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Tannedbaldhead said:
bks! Plod have always been like that with young neds, those suspected of being neds and young lads caught up in the periphery of neddish behaviour. Take it on the chin unless they pursue the matter further.
I bet he wasn't under arrest but at the station voluntarily helping police with inquiries. That used to be how they pissed about with me when I was young. I'd get stopped and told I didn't have to go with them though it'd be in my interests if I did. At the station they'd put me in an unlocked interview room. I'd be there all night. Every now and again an officer would stick his head through the door to let me know the BiB dealing with me was busy but would get to me as soon as he was available. Then at the end of his shift they'd send me home.
You'll have to pardon my ignorance, unless it's a regional term...but what is a "ned"?

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

163 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Ask a Scotsman.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Tannedbaldhead said:
Ask a Scotsman.
I see.

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

163 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Spitfire will be asking what a Polis is next.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Tannedbaldhead said:
Spitfire will be asking what a Polis is next.
I know Haggis, if that's any use?

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

163 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
Tannedbaldhead said:
bks! Plod have always been like that with young neds, those suspected of being neds and young lads caught up in the periphery of neddish behaviour. Take it on the chin unless they pursue the matter further.
I bet he wasn't under arrest but at the station voluntarily helping police with inquiries. That used to be how they pissed about with me when I was young. I'd get stopped and told I didn't have to go with them though it'd be in my interests if I did. At the station they'd put me in an unlocked interview room. I'd be there all night. Every now and again an officer would stick his head through the door to let me know the BiB dealing with me was busy but would get to me as soon as he was available. Then at the end of his shift they'd send me home.
You'll have to pardon my ignorance, unless it's a regional term...but what is a "ned"?
A Ned is a Non Educated Delinquent.

Eclassy

1,201 posts

153 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
I hope for his sake he wasnt arrested.

I'd imagine a 'rocket scientist' would need to visit the US quite a lot and an arrest would make it a little bit inconvenient.

Employers who require an enhanced DBS can also draw up all types of inferences from an arrest.

If it is as you describe and he was arrested, then there was absolutely no justification for his arrest and he should fight it.

Sadly the IPCC wont be able to do much for him. Persistence might get him a result after a while (took me 9 years), Lawyers will get it done much quicker (my mate's solicitors are currently negotiation a settlement).




Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Tannedbaldhead said:
Sounds a big deal but it's far from it.

My cousin's son is a smart lad. He's a first class honours graduate in Aeronautical Engineering and currently doing his masters specialising in rocket propulsion systems. He has been security cleared and has been offered a position with ........ (not at liberty to disclose)

Last week he was on his way home from uni when he found himself in a train carriage full of football supporters in Chelsea fan mode. A fellow passenger complained about the fans' behaviour and at a station on route the train was boarded by the police and all the young males on board were hauled off, the innocent as well as the guilty.

As my cousin was interviewed on the platform by an officer and giving his details a fellow student on another carriage shouted out the window "That's it Chris, tell them you're a fking rocket scientist!!!" as the train pulled off.

Cops asked my relation who was that who shouted to which he dutifully replied (even good students from good families know you never grass)"haven't a clue".

Guess who, out of all the neds and hooligans present, was the only individual to end up back at the station.

He was questioned and left alone in the interview room for periods time then re-questioned a number of times (and questioned with a degree of menace) by officers very keen to know who had shouted from the train. He was threatened with a whole load of charges along the lines of obstructing an investigation and perverting the course of justice. He stood by his initial line that he didn't know who had shouted and was eventually released without charge. BiBs have told him, however, that the matter is far from over.

Are the cops just messing with him because he wouldn't give up his mate (I know they really don't take to defiance) or could he be hauled in again for further harassment?

Is one "fking" shouted out loud really worth that level of police effort?

I can only think there must have been more to it? Maybe the cops on the platform heard something different? Maybe the shouter had been involved in another incident where other words were used? Considering the recent Chelsea fan train clip, maybe it was something similar?
As you say, for the sake of one expletive, I can't imagine them going to all that trouble to identify him.

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

163 months

Thursday 19th February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
Tannedbaldhead said:
Sounds a big deal but it's far from it.

My cousin's son is a smart lad. He's a first class honours graduate in Aeronautical Engineering and currently doing his masters specialising in rocket propulsion systems. He has been security cleared and has been offered a position with ........ (not at liberty to disclose)

Last week he was on his way home from uni when he found himself in a train carriage full of football supporters in Chelsea fan mode. A fellow passenger complained about the fans' behaviour and at a station on route the train was boarded by the police and all the young males on board were hauled off, the innocent as well as the guilty.

As my cousin was interviewed on the platform by an officer and giving his details a fellow student on another carriage shouted out the window "That's it Chris, tell them you're a fking rocket scientist!!!" as the train pulled off.

Cops asked my relation who was that who shouted to which he dutifully replied (even good students from good families know you never grass)"haven't a clue".

Guess who, out of all the neds and hooligans present, was the only individual to end up back at the station.

He was questioned and left alone in the interview room for periods time then re-questioned a number of times (and questioned with a degree of menace) by officers very keen to know who had shouted from the train. He was threatened with a whole load of charges along the lines of obstructing an investigation and perverting the course of justice. He stood by his initial line that he didn't know who had shouted and was eventually released without charge. BiBs have told him, however, that the matter is far from over.

Are the cops just messing with him because he wouldn't give up his mate (I know they really don't take to defiance) or could he be hauled in again for further harassment?

Is one "fking" shouted out loud really worth that level of police effort?

I can only think there must have been more to it? Maybe the cops on the platform heard something different? Maybe the shouter had been involved in another incident where other words were used? Considering the recent Chelsea fan train clip, maybe it was something similar?
As you say, for the sake of one expletive, I can't imagine them going to all that trouble to identify him.
Nah! I recon what's happened there isn't so much the shouter being problem as the rocket scientist defying the BiBs and refusing to give up his mate.