What chance of being killed in a road accident?
What chance of being killed in a road accident?
Author
Discussion

deeps

Original Poster:

5,425 posts

261 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
Anyone know the odds of dieing in a road accident?
The back page of the Highway code says 1 in 200 people will die this way (DFT stats).
If we looked at all deaths from 1925 to 2005 would this figure be correct? Or how do they calculate it?
Cheers.

rude girl

6,937 posts

279 months

Thursday 3rd February 2005
quotequote all
There are numbers here www.pacts.org.uk/

Do a search on 'statistics' - 2002 figures are the most recent published.

IIRC there are figures on the HSE website too, but I can't be bothered to look just now

kevinday

13,592 posts

300 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
deeps said:
Anyone know the odds of dieing in a road accident?
The back page of the Highway code says 1 in 200 people will die this way (DFT stats).
If we looked at all deaths from 1925 to 2005 would this figure be correct? Or how do they calculate it?
Cheers.


Yes, that is about right.

There are around 58 million people in the UK, average life expectancy is approx 70 years, therefore about 830,000 people die each year, of which 3,500 are the result of road accident. This equates to about 1 in 235 chance, in other words less than half of one percent.

markh508

80 posts

255 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
kevinday said:
There are around 58 million people in the UK, average life expectancy is approx 70 years, therefore about 830,000 people die each year, of which 3,500 are the result of road accident. This equates to about 1 in 235 chance, in other words less than half of one percent.


No, I don't think so... the number of deaths a year doesn't have any bearing on the chance of someone dying on the road. What you've worked out is the probability that someone who has died, died in a road accident.

The chance of an individual dying would be 58M/3500 which is approximately 1 in 16500. However this is a crude estimate as it does not take into account exposure - it treats someone doing 50k miles a year the same as someone who doesn't step out of the house.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

290 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
It seemed to be quite high yesterday.

I got stuck in two road closures.

One of them was definately a fatal

dilbert

7,741 posts

251 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
The accidents might have been caused by people avioding stray cones......

I actually tripped over a sign the other day telling me that the floor was wet. It had been left just around a corner in the middle of a corridor. Needless to say the floor it's self was bone dry.

I remember the days when one was free to fall over of ones own accord. It seems these days that you have to do it to order.

rude girl

6,937 posts

279 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
markh508 said:

No, I don't think so... the number of deaths a year doesn't have any bearing on the chance of someone dying on the road. What you've worked out is the probability that someone who has died, died in a road accident.

The chance of an individual dying would be 58M/3500 which is approximately 1 in 16500. However this is a crude estimate as it does not take into account exposure - it treats someone doing 50k miles a year the same as someone who doesn't step out of the house.


This would need to be further adjusted by the level of exposure to the different types of risk. Deaths per passenger mile are different for motorbikes, drivers/passengers of cars, pedestrians etc. Your own personal risk would depend on the mix of time you spent exposed to each probability.

You could go even further if you could drill down the stats. Eg if you don't wear a seatbelt by habit, your risk of death in an RTA would rise, even though your risk of being involved in an RTA would remain the same.





nonegreen

7,803 posts

290 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
I got stuck in two road closures.



Best place for you, it least it stopped you from posting on here

Plotloss

67,280 posts

290 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
nonegreen said:

Plotloss said:
I got stuck in two road closures.




Best place for you, it least it stopped you from posting on here


My, we are a little pointed this morning.

Another morning waking to economic misery getting to you old boy?

LongQ

13,864 posts

253 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
dilbert said:
I remember the days when one was free to fall over of ones own accord. It seems these days that you have to do it to order.


Eliminator

762 posts

275 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
To understand statistics you must understand the question first, then the answer. We had the answer and are left to imply the question, as follows:

If 1 in 200 deaths are caused by traffic accident then you do have a 1 in 200 chance of dying in a traffic accident. In other words, there is a 1 in 200 chance that your cause of death will be a traffic accident.

So far, so good.

But that is subject to the tiny, tiny point that you have to die of something and that may not be this year. Or next year, etc.

Dividing annual deaths from traffic accidents by the number of people living in the UK asks "what are your chances are of dying in a traffic accident this year".

Different question - see?

Speed lentilists take the answer from the first question and then present it in a way that you mis-interpret what it is telling you "I have a 1 in 200 chance of dying in a traffic accident if I go to the shops today". The art of lying with statistics!

GreenV8s

30,993 posts

304 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
How much difference would it be expected to make to your chance of dying in a road accident this year, if you and everyone around you drives scrupulously within the speed limits for the year, rather than exceeding them when it seems appropriate?

nonegreen

7,803 posts

290 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:

nonegreen said:


Plotloss said:
I got stuck in two road closures.





Best place for you, it least it stopped you from posting on here



My, we are a little pointed this morning.

Another morning waking to economic misery getting to you old boy?


Oi less of the old.

james_j

3,996 posts

275 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
It's worth noting that the odds of being killed as a result of excess speed is a tiny fraction of that.

Out of interest and as an indication of government priorities (!), I should think the odds of dying of the MRSA bug from a visit to hospital (as a patient) are much higher.

regmolehusband

4,077 posts

277 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
[redacted]

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

261 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
I once read some statistics (I know) that said of 1000 people, one would be murdered and 250 would die of a smoking related illness.

If it is even remotely accurate then it puts the risk of speeding in perspective.

hugoagogo

23,417 posts

253 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
i believe 84.28% of all statistics are made up on the spot

Peter Ward

2,097 posts

276 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
james_j said:
It's worth noting that the odds of being killed as a result of excess speed is a tiny fraction of that.

Out of interest and as an indication of government priorities (!), I should think the odds of dying of the MRSA bug from a visit to hospital (as a patient) are much higher.

Good points. If it's a 1 in 58,000,000/3,500 (1 in 16571) chance of dying in a road accident overall, then even the government's "one third lie" would only decrease it to 1 in 25217. Other things present a much higher probability and are accepted as normal. And that's ignoring the fact that a significant proportion of road deaths are actually pedestrians (especially drunk pedestrians). It's not just going out driving that puts you at risk of an RTA, it's going out at all.

Similarly, the risk of death from MRSA at 1 in 58,000,000/5,000 (or should that be 20,000?) works out at 1 in 11600 (or 1 in 2900?), but most people are not admitted to hospital each year. If we assume say 10% do, then that would put the chance of dying from MRSA when in hospital up to 1 in 1160 (or 1 in 290!!). Puts RTAs in the shade, doesn't it?

kevinday

13,592 posts

300 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
markh508 said:

kevinday said:
There are around 58 million people in the UK, average life expectancy is approx 70 years, therefore about 830,000 people die each year, of which 3,500 are the result of road accident. This equates to about 1 in 235 chance, in other words less than half of one percent.



No, I don't think so... the number of deaths a year doesn't have any bearing on the chance of someone dying on the road. What you've worked out is the probability that someone who has died, died in a road accident.

The chance of an individual dying would be 58M/3500 which is approximately 1 in 16500. However this is a crude estimate as it does not take into account exposure - it treats someone doing 50k miles a year the same as someone who doesn't step out of the house.


No you are not quite right, the sum would be 58m/ 3500 * 70 (the average life expectancy) = 1 in 235 ish.

Or, 1 in every 235 deaths are the result of a road accident, year in year out. Therefore the chance of you being one of them is exactly the same, 1 in 235 but we cannot say which year it will be.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

259 months

Friday 4th February 2005
quotequote all
1984 in my case, but I'm feeling much better now

Thank for defibrillators