Traffic Light Camera
Author
Discussion

loveice

Original Poster:

678 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
When I was approaching a junction with a traffic light camera today, the green light suddenly turned into amber. At that time I was very close to the stop line. So, I decided to brake as hard as I could. By the time I stopped, the rear wheels were just over the stop line (rear bumper should be still on the stop line). In this case, would I get a ticket? In fact, I was in the slow lane. The car next to me in the fast lane simply speeded up and went through without stopping.

Edited by loveice on Thursday 10th December 11:11

Prizam

2,447 posts

171 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Their is no slow or fast lane.

Learn to anticipate road conditions. traffic lights often change colour you know.

AMBER means ‘Stop’ at the stop line. You may go on only if the AMBER appears after you have crossed the stop line or are so close to it that to pull up might cause an accident

Edited by Prizam on Thursday 10th December 11:28

Magic919

14,561 posts

231 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Prizam said:
Their is now slow or fast lane.
Wot?

Devil2575

13,400 posts

218 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
You should have carried on. If you were so close to the stop line that you couldn't stop before it then you shouldn't have tried too.

loveice

Original Poster:

678 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Prizam said:
Their is no slow or fast lane.

Learn to anticipate road conditions. traffic lights often change colour you know.

AMBER means ‘Stop’ at the stop line. You may go on only if the AMBER appears after you have crossed the stop line or are so close to it that to pull up might cause an accident

Edited by Prizam on Thursday 10th December 11:28
That's why I started braking as soon as I saw amber light. But by the time car stopped, most of it was over the stop line. My question is would the traffic light camera behind me take photo of my car and issue me with a ticket in this situation?

Mr Trophy

6,811 posts

233 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Magic919 said:
Prizam said:
Their is now slow or fast lane.
Wot?
hehe

worsy

6,610 posts

205 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
I think they detect movement so many seconds after a red light is shown, rather than detecting an object sat over the line.

loveice

Original Poster:

678 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
You should have carried on. If you were so close to the stop line that you couldn't stop before it then you shouldn't have tried too.
Couple of weeks ago a friend of mine was pulled over by a police car driving behind him because he went through an amber light. He wasn't fined or anything. But, he was told specifically that amber light means stop. That's why I braked as soon as I saw the amber light. But, the speed limit was 40mph. There was no way for me stop behind the stop line. With my rear bumper over the stop line was the best I could do.

speedking31

3,951 posts

166 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
What speed should you drive at to ensure that you can always stop at an amber? Clue: the answer is an integer less than 1 smile

loveice

Original Poster:

678 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
What speed should you drive at to ensure that you can always stop at an amber? Clue: the answer is an integer less than 1 smile
Well, that's the thing. There was a speed camera only about 100m before the traffic light. Therefore, most cars were doing 40mph or less when approaching the traffic light. It's just the amber light started when I was very close to the stop line (and doing 40mph).

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
If you're doing 40mph and so close to the stop line you couldnt stop before it carry on, amber is 'stop if safe to do so' 90% over the line isnt safe so you'd carry on.

loveice

Original Poster:

678 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
CaptainMorgan said:
If you're doing 40mph and so close to the stop line you couldnt stop before it carry on, amber is 'stop if safe to do so' 90% over the line isnt safe so you'd carry on.
So in the future I should carry on driving even if there's a traffic light camera? Does the traffic light camera work according to the high way code, ie "Amber is stop if safe to do so"? Or it will catch anyone who cross the stop line after the light turns to red? Coz, if I didn't stop, I'm sure I wouldn't be on the other side of the junction when the light turned red.

Swervin_Mervin

5,003 posts

268 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Prizam said:
AMBER means ‘Stop’ at the stop line. You may go on only if the AMBER appears after you have crossed the stop line or are so close to it that to pull up might cause an accident

Edited by Prizam on Thursday 10th December 11:28
No it doesn't. Amber mean "stop unless it's not safe to do so". Screeching to a halt with your back wheels over the stopline would suggest stopping was probably the less safe option.

herewego

8,814 posts

243 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
loveice said:
CaptainMorgan said:
If you're doing 40mph and so close to the stop line you couldnt stop before it carry on, amber is 'stop if safe to do so' 90% over the line isnt safe so you'd carry on.
So in the future I should carry on driving even if there's a traffic light camera? Does the traffic light camera work according to the high way code, ie "Amber is stop if safe to do so"? Or it will catch anyone who cross the stop line after the light turns to red? Coz, if I didn't stop, I'm sure I wouldn't be on the other side of the junction when the light turned red.
Have you thought about doing a "Pass Plus" course?

loveice

Original Poster:

678 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
herewego said:
Have you thought about doing a "Pass Plus" course?
No. How would Pass Plus answer the question I'm asking? If I was few metres further from the stop line when the amber light turns, then I wouldn't be in this situation. And if the junction is smaller, I wouldnt worry about not being able to drive cross it before the light turning full red. If anything, shouldn't the amber light be set according to the size of the junction and the speed limit. I mean if the junction is bigger, it should stay on for longer than the smaller ones? Anyway, I did some research on this. It seems amber lights last 3 seconds in this country no matter how big or small the junctions are, whatever the speed limits are.

Beetnik

578 posts

214 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
It's an 'absolute offence' so even if you're stopped, if your vehicle straddles the line, it's a collar.

I found this out to my cost a few years ago in pretty much the circumstances you describe. I stopped, front tyres just over the line, whilst a car flew past me on the outside lane. I knew I'd stopped and the picture I requested showed it to be so. I coughed up but all the while wondered if it was the other car who'd triggered the camera.

Bad news on the insurance front, I'm afraid, running a red light is frowned upon.

</Job's comforter>

vonhosen

40,597 posts

247 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
loveice said:
herewego said:
Have you thought about doing a "Pass Plus" course?
No. How would Pass Plus answer the question I'm asking? If I was few metres further from the stop line when the amber light turns, then I wouldn't be in this situation. And if the junction is smaller, I wouldnt worry about not being able to drive cross it before the light turning full red. If anything, shouldn't the amber light be set according to the size of the junction and the speed limit. I mean if the junction is bigger, it should stay on for longer than the smaller ones? Anyway, I did some research on this. It seems amber lights last 3 seconds in this country no matter how big or small the junctions are, whatever the speed limits are.
The size of the junction has nothing to do with it. The offence is crossing the line (not the junction) whilst the signal is red. That's what the camera looks at.

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Beetnik said:
It's an 'absolute offence' so even if you're stopped, if your vehicle straddles the line, it's a collar.
Not so.

loveice

Original Poster:

678 posts

277 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Beetnik said:
It's an 'absolute offence' so even if you're stopped, if your vehicle straddles the line, it's a collar.

I found this out to my cost a few years ago in pretty much the circumstances you describe. I stopped, front tyres just over the line, whilst a car flew past me on the outside lane. I knew I'd stopped and the picture I requested showed it to be so. I coughed up but all the while wondered if it was the other car who'd triggered the camera.

Bad news on the insurance front, I'm afraid, running a red light is frowned upon.

</Job's comforter>
Well, in my case the car on the outside lane was slightly in front of me when the amber light turned on. I guess that's why it drove on. It shouldn't have triggered the camera. I just want to know if I could have triggered camera. Coz when I stopped, most of my car was in front of the stop line. But I think I stopped before the light even turned red.

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
loveice said:
I just want to know if I could have triggered camera. Coz when I stopped, most of my car was in front of the stop line. But I think I stopped before the light even turned red.
A red light offence is committed if any part of the vehicle proceeds beyond the stop-line when the red light is showing.

No offence is committed if the vehicle is stopped astride the line as or before the light changes to red and doesn't move forward until the light changes back to green.