Car requires expensive wear related repair - what to do?
Car requires expensive wear related repair - what to do?
Author
Discussion

caelite

Original Poster:

4,282 posts

142 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
Hey folks

Just got my 2nd lemon in a row and Im entirely out of money (still trying to sell the last one whilst it rusts on my parents drive). Bought a 04 subaru forester with 124k on the clock. I should have foreseen issues but whilst driving it home I began to notice the clutch slipping slightly (It didnt on the test drive, but I didnt really get a chance to boot it until I hit the motorway), a week later and 500miles on the clock after purchase (200 miles of that was driving it home) the clutch is knackered and the car is pretty much unable to accelerate. Luckly I had purchased a "all inclusive warranty" from a 3rd party selling through the dealer which listed its included parts as a clutch (if it wasnt for that I would have turned around the moment the clutch started slipping).

So on Monday I went into the local scooby garage and asked for a quote for a clutch job £830 (turns out subaru AWD drivetrains have the most ackward clutches)... After asking in an independent garage I was given a better rate of £500, so with these 2 quotes I called up the warranty company to talk about how they handle claims, was promptly told that at that mileage they wont pay out as it would be wear & tear, even though it list clutch replacements as an item they cover on the paperwork they sold me the policy on. After that I called up the dealer who I bought it from who stated that he offers no warranty on parts and thats what the 3rd party warranty is for.

Ive had the car about a week. I really just want rid of it now and my money back since I genuinely cant afford the repair, is there anything I can do with the dealer/warranty or am I just screwed due to the age/mileage of the car?

Edited by caelite on Thursday 24th December 18:34

750turbo

6,164 posts

254 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
caelite said:
Hey folks

Just got my 2nd lemon in a row and Im entirely out of money (still trying to sell the last one whilst it rusts on my parents drive). Bought a 04 subaru forester with 124k on the clock. I should have foreseen issues but whilst driving it home I began to notice the clutch slipping slightly (It didnt on the test drive, but I didnt really get a chance to boot it until I hit the motorway), a week later and 500miles on the clock after purchase (200 miles of that was driving it home) the clutch is knackered and the car is pretty much unable to accelerate. Luckly I had purchased a "all inclusive warranty" from a 3rd party selling through the dealer which listed its included parts as a clutch (if it wasnt for that I would have turned around the moment the clutch started slipping).

So on Monday I went into the local scooby garage and asked for a quote for a clutch job £830 (turns out subaru AWD drivetrains have the most ackward clutches)... After asking in an independent garage I was given a better rate of £500, so with these 2 quotes I called up the warranty company to talk about how they handle claims, was promptly told that at that mileage they wont pay out as it would be wear & tear, even though it list clutch replacements as an item they cover on the paperwork they sold me the policy on. After that I called up the dealer who I bought it from who stated that he offers no warranty on parts and thats what the 3rd party warranty is for.

Ive had the car about a week. I really just want rid of it now and my money back since I genuinely cant afford the repair, is there anything I can do with the dealer/warranty or am I just screwed due to the age/mileage of the car?

Edited by caelite on Thursday 24th December 18:34
A 12 year old car...

124,000 miles...

"All Inclusive Warranty" rrrrigghhhttt!

Sorry OP, I fear the worst for you.


Megaflow

11,586 posts

255 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
banghead

hornetrider

63,161 posts

235 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
SOGA applies here surely. You can assume the fault was present at sale. Dealers issue.

caelite

Original Poster:

4,282 posts

142 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
750turbo said:
A 12 year old car...

124,000 miles...

"All Inclusive Warranty" rrrrigghhhttt!

Sorry OP, I fear the worst for you.
I understand that and if it had happened after I had atleast owned it for more an a month or 2 I honestly wouldnt mind. But this is the 2nd time in a row ive bought a clean looking car from a dealer only for it to break down, through no fault of my own, less than week later and to be honest I just cant afford to go through it again.

hornetrider said:
SOGA applies here surely. You can assume the fault was present at sale. Dealers issue.
Any idea what I do next? I know under SOGA and the new Consumer Rights Act I have 30 days to reject and push a refund and 6 months to claim for any unexpected faults that would have been present before purchase but to be honest I have no idea how to go about having these acts enforced when a dealer doesn't want to co-operate.

crazy about cars

4,454 posts

199 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
SOGA applies here surely. You can assume the fault was present at sale. Dealers issue.
To be of satisfactory quality a few factors such as age, price and mileage are taken into consideration. Worth a shot but is not 100% guaranteed. (Sale of Goods Act 1979, as amended by the Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 and the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002.)

ging84

9,548 posts

176 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
you can now reject a car within 30 days for a full refund
the problem is that the onus is still on you to show the fault was present when you bought it

To get it repaired, in the first 6 months the onus is on the garage to show the fault was not present when you bought it

wack

2,103 posts

236 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
Anything up to 6 months the assumption is that he fault was there at the time of purchase

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/content/new-laws-prote...

The problem is while its in dispute you have to park it up until it's sorted out

As its within the 30 days and the clutch has gone I'd think you have a good case for a refund as it's not fit for purpose

More advice at CAB

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/consumer/buying-...

Edited by wack on Thursday 24th December 20:52


Edited by wack on Thursday 24th December 22:47

rb5er

11,657 posts

202 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
Warranty on a 124k miles car? People still buy that?

caelite

Original Poster:

4,282 posts

142 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
rb5er said:
Warranty on a 124k miles car? People still buy that?
Eh I wouldnt pay for it but after trying to get him to budge more on the price I managed to get a 6 month 3rd party warranty out of him.

itcaptainslow

4,792 posts

166 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
It is more than reasonable to expect the clutch to be nearing the end of its life on a car that's done 124k miles. A warranty won't cover wear, only "sudden failure"-i.e. it exploding!

Sorry OP-you're on your own with this one.

Derek Smith

49,943 posts

278 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
You are entitled to a car that works without reference to the mileage. Your car only ran for 500 miles so the fault was, in all probability, present at time of sale. As you say, there is considerable legislation out there for you.

With any luck one of the legal experts will come on and advise you, but there is always the CAB, trading standards, and similar. There are any number of websites that offer advice, and some with examples of what letters to write, your options, and more.


JimmyConwayNW

3,653 posts

155 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
It's not right and whoever posted it is clearly not on this planet. Px a car for value of a grand. Dealer spends a grand on it and sells it for 3 grand.
You are not entitled to 3 grand back and to even begin to think that would pass is absolutely ridiculous. Merry Xmas.

crossy67

1,570 posts

209 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
And your Subaru garage is tugging at your draws too. Doesn't matter how complex the 4wd system is, it's easier to pull the engine out on them.

Vaud

59,734 posts

185 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
wack said:
something else I found out, if you PX a car and they sell it for more than they gave you they have to refund the full amount of he sale price.
Kindly post up some reference for that.



I'll help.
You will find it is absolute and complete tosh.

wack

2,103 posts

236 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
Vaud said:
Kindly post up some reference for that.



I'll help.
You will find it is absolute and complete tosh.
You're right, I misread what it said

Vaud

59,734 posts

185 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
wack said:
You're right, I misread what it said
Fair enough. Merry Easter, etc

beer

Steve H

7,625 posts

225 months

Friday 25th December 2015
quotequote all
I'm not surprised that the warranty would only cover a sudden failure rather than wear and tear but the dealer can't use the old "that's what the warranty is for" line as if it overules all legal rights and excludes them from any liabilities.

Fit for purpose is a pretty basic thing to decide, any car sold as roadworthy becoming undrivable after just a few days doesn't make it.

paintman

7,860 posts

220 months

Friday 25th December 2015
quotequote all
Roadworthy/unroadworthy is usually taken as being fit for use on a road without presenting a danger to other road users:
"What is meant by the term unroadworthy?
The Road Traffic Act 1988 does not give a definition of what is "unroadworthy", but instead makes reference to the following areas that, if not satisfactory, may lead to a vehicle being unroadworthy: -
• Steering and steering gear
• Brakes and braking systems
• Tyres;
• Exhaust systems;
• Seatbelts and seatbelt anchorages;
• General condition (corrosion, suspension etc).
In short a vehicle may be classed as being unroadworthy if it is in such a condition that its use on the road would endanger the driver, passengers, other road users or pedestrians. There are also regulations, which, set out construction requirements for various components such as brakes, steering, gears, tyres, construction, weight and equipment of the vehicle. If a vehicle fails to meet the requirements it may also be considered unroadworthy"
http://swercots-partners.org.uk/system/files/rta_g...

A slipping clutch isn't going to fall under that heading. Which leaves you with the CRA as already mentioned.

Slidingpillar

761 posts

166 months

Friday 25th December 2015
quotequote all
I've no idea if the Subaru is among them, but some cars give next to no notice of clutch failure. Ok one minute, slipping the next.