Who needs a warrant?
Author
Discussion

EskimoArapaho

Original Poster:

5,135 posts

165 months

Jasandjules

72,628 posts

259 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Would love to see them try that in my house...

voyds9

8,490 posts

313 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Dogs a bit fed up of postmans legs, I'm sure a policemans leg would make a nice change.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Our neighbourhood teams have always had good feedback from such tactics (as opposed to internet / Twitter warriors). Although they were limited to knocking / trying door handles / advising).

Civil law isn't my bag, but for it to be actionable it needs to be "unjustifiable intrusion" (IIRC), so that would be interesting to see the interpretation.


FurryExocet

3,011 posts

211 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Would love to see them try that in my house...
I take it you lock your doors? No issue then

Some Gump

13,018 posts

216 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
As usual, it's the "hate the man" wkers that make the noise. Reality is hose coppers have probably helped a lot of people by doing that.

Still, "@quendergeer", some half arsed muppet who has 10k tweets (all upset about stuff) doesn't like it. What a surprise.

Bigends

6,192 posts

158 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Good crime prevention work but I wouldnt have dreamt of letting myself into someones house if there was nobody in.
If an insecurities found and theres nothing to indicate crime -close up and leave a note. Publicise what theyve been doing by all means - but to have the Cops and PCSO's leering into the camera whilst in somebodys home - not really appropriate.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
Still, "@quendergeer", some half arsed muppet who has 10k tweets (all upset about stuff) doesn't like it. What a surprise.
Not to mention he (?) is wrong.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

188 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Knocking and advising is good- popping in to take photos isn't.

If they did it in my house I'd be asking why the money on the sideboard is missing.

elanfan

5,527 posts

257 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Never mind the fact that they just given the thick brute force and ignorance brigade a new tactic they hadn't thought of before. I reckon this sort of crime will go up because of the publicity

AlexRS2782

8,530 posts

243 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
Knocking and advising is good- popping in to take photos isn't.

If they did it in my house I'd be asking why the money on the sideboard is missing.
Oh no, why did you have to suggest that frown

Eclassy (or one of his alias accounts) will be along soon to regale us with one or more of his many tales of woe where he had a run in with the Police and they stole his ££££ before / after giving him a beating getmecoat

velocefica

4,727 posts

138 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
You would love the plods to walk through some unlocked door and the owner believing them to be an intruder use their lawful right to exercise reasonable force and clump them over the head.

Greendubber

15,355 posts

233 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
I'm sure they shout "hello, anyone home its the police" rather than just sneak in.

paintman

7,860 posts

220 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
I'm sure they shout "hello, anyone home its the police" rather than just sneak in.
Exactly.

It's probably the burglar that stole your money off the sideboard after finding your property insecure or broke in.
Perhaps a patrolling officer should just ignore an insecure apparently unoccupied property or the concerns of your neighbours.
No doubt we'd see posts on the lines of 'patrolling officer ignored my house that had obviously been broken into and all my stuff has been stolen aren't the police rubbish'.
And on finding an insecure property if ringing the bell or calling out receives no response then a check wouldn't require a warrant.

Edited by paintman on Tuesday 26th January 09:21

chazwind

130 posts

155 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Rovinghawk said:
Knocking and advising is good- popping in to take photos isn't.
Exactly. I agree with the sentiment of what they're doing, but this smacks more of naming-and-shaming rather than education.

Greendubber

15,355 posts

233 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
chazwind said:
Rovinghawk said:
Knocking and advising is good- popping in to take photos isn't.
Exactly. I agree with the sentiment of what they're doing, but this smacks more of naming-and-shaming rather than education.
You do realise no ones home dont you?


surveyor

18,705 posts

214 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
I'm sure they shout "hello, anyone home its the police" rather than just sneak in.
I'm betting they would close our door rather quickly after shouting that. A Dalmatian who is a tad possessive of his house and sounds more viscous than he actually is.

chazwind

130 posts

155 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Greendubber said:
You do realise no ones home dont you?
Yep, I read the article; those owners are dumb. However, it says the images were "cropped by the BBC so properties are not identified", which infers that the original tweets by the police were not.

Greendubber

15,355 posts

233 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
surveyor said:
I'm betting they would close our door rather quickly after shouting that. A Dalmatian who is a tad possessive of his house and sounds more viscous than he actually is.
Of course they would.

The whole taking of pictures and putting some grinning PCSO on twitter is ridiculous. Checking properties and leaving a crime prevention leaflet is how we used to do it, we had ones that looked like a boot print that would be left on the hall floor or an arm that would get posted through open ground floor windows.

The area that these pictures are being taken in has a big student population meaning the local scrotes have a great time helping themselves to laptops and ipads from insecure houses.

I think Coventry police have the best intentions but maybe took it too far with pictures in houses being banded about.

wc98

12,738 posts

170 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
another instance of the professionally offended taking offence on other peoples behalf. it says none of the home owners had a problem and were thankful of the advice. i agree with greendubber the leafleting campaigns of old were probably just as effective,but this area obviously has a problem and they are actually actively trying to address it.