25,000 vehicles speed past camera - in ONE week.
25,000 vehicles speed past camera - in ONE week.
Author
Discussion

Mill Wheel

Original Poster:

6,149 posts

226 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
http://www.gloucestercitizen.co.uk/Police-clock-25...

Gloucester Citizen News said:
Almost 25,000 vehicles have been clocked speeding along the A46 by a new camera – in just a week.

Police are sending letters to some of the drivers telling them to slow down.
They will not be fined but another camera will be installed which would usually mean an £80 fine and three penalty points.

The highest speed recorded in the 30mph zone on the A46 in Rodborough, near Stroud, was 64mph.
Another 42 vehicles were clocked doing more than 50mph.

Inspector Andy Poole from Stroud Police Station revealed that, of the 94,912 vehicles which passed through the camera's gaze in a week, 24,962 were exceeding 31.5mph.
If drivers had been fined the camera would have drummed up £1,996,960.

The Automatic Number Plate Recognition camera in Rodborough was installed as part of an initiative by the village's road safety working group and the county's Police and Crime Commissioner Martin Surl.
It has been stationed outside the Stroud Enterprise Centre on the 30mph section of the A46 between Nailsworth and Stroud since February 19.
It seems the 25,000 is based on a 31.5 mph threshold, so perhaps not surprising.
However, the high number over the limit might disappoint some councillors.

Citizen News said:
Rodborough Parish Council member Charles Pedrick said the first camera was slowing drivers down without resorting to fines and penalty points and there was a lot of interest in it from around the country and in Gloucestershire.

"Once the police have spoken to someone who has been seen speeding several times, they change their behaviour, which is what we want," he said.

"We have had people from other councils ringing us, asking us how they can get it."

tapereel

1,860 posts

146 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Community Speed Watch without the operators perhaps.

Jasandjules

72,624 posts

259 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Wow how many thousands died? Must have been a bloodbath.

Dixy

3,659 posts

235 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
I expected it to be one of those roads where you wonder why it is a 30 mph, but not at all, seems perfectly reasonable for it to be 30 limit and perfectly reasonable for drivers to observe the limit.

http://www.gloucestercitizen.co.uk/Big-brother-cam...

Shows the road and GL53NL is the post code for google street view

Dogwatch

6,383 posts

252 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Looks as if most were doing between 30 and 40 then.

Time to introduce a 20 zone!

dxg

10,784 posts

290 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Wow how many thousands died? Must have been a bloodbath.
Five slight injuries since 2005.

But think of the children!

Mill Wheel

Original Poster:

6,149 posts

226 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Wow how many thousands died? Must have been a bloodbath.
To be fair, the softly softly approach is better than jumping in and issuing fines right away, but one must ask why a camera, and not intermittent invention by officers, STOPPING those 50 mph+ drivers instead of letting them on their way.

Also all those councils having a problem with speeding - how much is due to traffic density and not speed?

Outside my sons school there used to be a 40 mph limit on a main trunk road... but they reduced it to 30 mph... NOT because traffic was too fast, but because cars exiting the school driveway were having trouble getting out at peak times.
They STILL have trouble getting out, because at the slower speed, traffic simply bunches up together and takes longer to pass by...

banghead

cmaguire

3,589 posts

139 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
So well over a quarter of the vehicles passing that camera were exceeding the limit (by at least 1.5mph).

Bunch of hypocrites probably.

mygoldfishbowl

4,287 posts

173 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
£80 fine?

BertBert

21,297 posts

241 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Dixy said:
perfectly reasonable for drivers to observe the limit.
As determined by 1.5 mph over the limit?
It just incites wkish reactions by the "speeders" brigade.

A205GTI

750 posts

196 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
To be Fair I live near this stretch and the reason it is so low for speed is the Farm animals that are let out on the common to graze, along with lots of dog walkers.

BertBert

21,297 posts

241 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
A205GTI said:
To be Fair I live near this stretch and the reason it is so low for speed is the Farm animals that are let out on the common to graze, along with lots of dog walkers.
And it makes a material difference? I don't think so. How fast do the farm animals walk?

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

290 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
I've never seen a grazing dog walker :-)

Wacky Racer

41,381 posts

277 months

Friday 18th March 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Wow how many thousands died? Must have been a bloodbath.
laugh

Glosphil

4,889 posts

264 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
A205GTI said:
To be Fair I live near this stretch and the reason it is so low for speed is the Farm animals that are let out on the common to graze, along with lots of dog walkers.
The report is of a camera on the A46 Nailsworth to Stroud with the camera in the built up area
at the Rodborough end - near the Golden Cross junction traffic lights. It is a mile away from Rodborough Common where there are grazing cows (only between May and November). There is a 40 limit across Rodborough Common and at least one cow is killed every year.

98elise

32,727 posts

191 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Wow how many thousands died? Must have been a bloodbath.
That was my first thought! 25,000 pass a sign with a number on it and nobody died or was injured.

Given thats just one week, the actual numbers will be in the millions.

0000

13,966 posts

221 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
ash73 said:
Threshold should be 10%+2 everyone above that should get a ticket, if they are too dumb to see a camera they deserve it.
Do clever people take their eyes off the road look for cameras at the top of every telegraph pole they drive past?



Nothing should happen. These 25000 vehicles didn't have an incident, exceeding the limit is clearly poorly correlated with any safety measure.

WinstonWolf

72,863 posts

269 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
98elise said:
Jasandjules said:
Wow how many thousands died? Must have been a bloodbath.
That was my first thought! 25,000 pass a sign with a number on it and nobody died or was injured.

Given thats just one week, the actual numbers will be in the millions.
Seems to suggest the limit us set incorrectly...

Jasandjules

72,624 posts

259 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
WinstonWolf said:
Seems to suggest the limit us set incorrectly...
If it is exceeded 25,000 times in a week, I'd say it is a touch low....

Countdown

49,519 posts

226 months

Saturday 19th March 2016
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Wow how many thousands died? Must have been a bloodbath.
Exactly. We should wait until at least quite a few people have died before we consider forcing people to slow down. rolleyes