unmarked cameravan?
Author
Discussion

Jonny TVR

Original Poster:

4,551 posts

311 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
On the motorway last night there was a suspicious looking van on a bridge with a cut out black window on the side facing oncoming traffic. It was blue and from what I could see had no markings. Is this an unmarked camera van I wonder

pim

2,346 posts

154 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
Could be a so called safety camara van.

I got flashed by a unmarked van a few weeks ago.47 in a 40 downhill.

The van was standing on a grass verge a good distance away.Never mind my mistake and I will pay the price and learn something from it.

Jonny TVR

Original Poster:

4,551 posts

311 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
well lets see if I get more post from the police

PAULJ5555

3,554 posts

206 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
If they want people to stop speeding it makes sense to hide all the cameras, put them in builders vans/horse boxes that way nobody knows where they are and were all forced to slow down.

All in the name of safety remember.

Edited by PAULJ5555 on Monday 1st August 12:37

pim

2,346 posts

154 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
If camara vans are for safety I have no problem with that.Any fine I be willing to give to a charity of my choice.>)

mph1977

12,467 posts

198 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
pim said:
If camara vans are for safety I have no problem with that.Any fine I be willing to give to a charity of my choice.>)
or you could just not be a criminal / take responsibility for your own actions ...

cmaguire

3,589 posts

139 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
or you could just not be a criminal / take responsibility for your own actions ...
Criminal.
Maybe if I say it enough times I'll start to believe it?


No, I can't take that seriously.

PAULJ5555

3,554 posts

206 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
cmaguire said:
mph1977 said:
or you could just not be a criminal / take responsibility for your own actions ...
Criminal.
Maybe if I say it enough times I'll start to believe it?


No, I can't take that seriously.
What about all the criminals who have killed people when speeding. Laws are their for a reason.

mph1977

12,467 posts

198 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
PAULJ5555 said:
What about all the criminals who have killed people when speeding. Laws are their for a reason.
it's an almost free-wibble fallacy that some people hold dear that speeding, shop-lifting and various others crimes are 'victimless' and exist only to appease corporate interests and raise money for the exchequer.

cmaguire

3,589 posts

139 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
it's an almost free-wibble fallacy that some people hold dear that speeding, shop-lifting and various others crimes are 'victimless' and exist only to appease corporate interests and raise money for the exchequer.
Speeding.
Shop-lifting.
Various other crimes.

In nearly all cases speeding is victimless, there is no intent to involve or impact upon a third party, and that rarely happens.
In nearly all cases shop-lifting isn't victimless, as property is being stolen (perhaps all, but there may be some exceptions not obvious at first thought)
And various other crimes?

But much like discussions about disciplining children by spanking or the like always come back to Baby P and the like, nearly all discussions about speed always get brought back to kids getting mown down in residential areas.
When we all know the discussion should be about NSL

pim

2,346 posts

154 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
or you could just not be a criminal / take responsibility for your own actions ...
Excuse me? Are you mister saint if you are bless you.Maybe it takes one to know one.


pim

2,346 posts

154 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
cmaguire said:
Speeding.
Shop-lifting.
Various other crimes.

In nearly all cases speeding is victimless, there is no intent to involve or impact upon a third party, and that rarely happens.
In nearly all cases shop-lifting isn't victimless, as property is being stolen (perhaps all, but there may be some exceptions not obvious at first thought)
And various other crimes?

But much like discussions about disciplining children by spanking or the like always come back to Baby P and the like, nearly all discussions about speed always get brought back to kids getting mown down in residential areas.
When we all know the discussion should be about NSL
Inapropiate speed.I could be driving at 15 to 20 mph when children are leaving school and it would be to quick.On the courses Safety Camara they mention braking distances etc.Speed related to braking and reaction.
That didn't safe my little mate Harry who stepped out into the road and got killed in front of me.The driver was apparently driving very slow but couldn't react in time to miss Harry.

andy118run

959 posts

236 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
Jonny TVR said:
On the motorway last night there was a suspicious looking van on a bridge with a cut out black window on the side facing oncoming traffic. It was blue and from what I could see had no markings. Is this an unmarked camera van I wonder
No idea about other parts of the country, but in Norwich I've seen vans very much as you describe.

Usually parked up on reasonably busy routes within the city (not seen them on bridges over any of the main A roads).

Always seem to be accompanied by officers tucked away in a nearby road, mostly on motorcycles. Therefore, I assume they are ANPR cameras rather than speed cameras.

cmaguire

3,589 posts

139 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
pim said:
Inapropiate speed.I could be driving at 15 to 20 mph when children are leaving school and it would be to quick.On the courses Safety Camara they mention braking distances etc.Speed related to braking and reaction.
That didn't safe my little mate Harry who stepped out into the road and got killed in front of me.The driver was apparently driving very slow but couldn't react in time to miss Harry.
The concept of inappropriate speed is probably most relevant as regards the validity of an ever increasing number of reduced limits forced upon us rather than the speed of those obeying those limits.

mph1977

12,467 posts

198 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
pim said:
mph1977 said:
or you could just not be a criminal / take responsibility for your own actions ...
Excuse me? Are you mister saint if you are bless you.Maybe it takes one to know one.
two choices with regard to criminal activity
1. don't commit the crime
2. don't whinge when you get caught

eltawater

3,534 posts

209 months

Monday 1st August 2016
quotequote all
Jonny TVR said:
On the motorway last night there was a suspicious looking van on a bridge with a cut out black window on the side facing oncoming traffic. It was blue and from what I could see had no markings. Is this an unmarked camera van I wonder
Saw this one last week, maybe not as inconspicuous as yours but a new one on me to see it in dark livery. You can just about make out the dark red POLICE at the top of the doors...


R0G

5,036 posts

185 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2016
quotequote all
Why be concerned about speed cameras ?

A good driver is perfectly capable of sticking to speed limits which they proved they can do when they passed the driving test

On accepting the licence a driver agrees to abide by the laws - if a driver does not agree they can refuse the licence

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2016
quotequote all
Well unsurprisingly the thread degenerated quickly into the usual suspects full of self righteousness because they've NEVER exceeded the speed limit.

Someone will be along in a minute to start talking about the "crime" of misrepresenting number plates leading to other serious crime.

You know, like everyone who starts smoking cigarettes ends up on heroin smile I think most of the aforementioned suspects stayed at the smoking crack stage.

Pete317

1,430 posts

252 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2016
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
PAULJ5555 said:
What about all the criminals who have killed people when speeding. Laws are their for a reason.
it's an almost free-wibble fallacy that some people hold dear that speeding, shop-lifting and various others crimes are 'victimless' and exist only to appease corporate interests and raise money for the exchequer.
Do you guys have anything to back up your emotive claptrap?

Pete317

1,430 posts

252 months

Tuesday 2nd August 2016
quotequote all
R0G said:
A good driver is perfectly capable of sticking to speed limits which they proved they can do when they passed the driving test
So why are new drivers so over-represented in the accident statistics?