Inheritance woes
Author
Discussion

Cider Andy

Original Poster:

1,889 posts

255 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
My friend's father died at the beginning of June, bequeathing 80% of his estate to her and 10% each to his two other daughters. The estate basically consists of a dwelling and cash.

Some weeks prior to his [expected] death he signed a statement to the effect that my friend could dispose of the contents of his house how she saw fit and to occupy the house, rent free, at his leisure, along with her teenage daughter. He was of sound mind. Two years earlier she had been widowed and the estate of her late husband had finally been settled when she sold their home at the end of May.

She is estranged from her sisters and can only communicate with them via solicitors; the two of them are on good terms with each other. She has offered to buy their 10% stakes in the house for cash. And that's where the problems begin: they are refusing and are demanding she pays them rent, pro rata.

What are the likely outcomes here?

Du1point8

22,925 posts

222 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
They own 10% of the house and other assets.

Your friend cant buy them out as they are being difficult, probably are going to have an issue selling due to them too, so would need to apply to a court for an "order for sale".

So the only option I would see is that they offer 5% above (or something similar) as a sweetener, pay 10% rent, or finally force a sale.


akirk

5,778 posts

144 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
is the cash worth more than 20% of the estate?
if so - get appropriate valuations of the house for probate
pay their 10% each out of cash and keep the house

catman

2,504 posts

205 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Who is the Executor of the estate? As said, it may be easiest to work out how much the Sisters are owed and pay them that.

If the will only stipulates that they are entitled to 10% of the estate, then a cash sum would satisfy that. She could include a payment for "rent" to date, if it would get them off her back.

Tim

OddCat

2,828 posts

201 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
.....your friend could always do the decent thing and split everything 3 ways....

Taita

8,002 posts

233 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
OddCat said:
.....your friend could always do the decent thing and split everything 3 ways....
That's not what the father wanted though is it smile

Don

28,378 posts

314 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Taita said:
OddCat said:
.....your friend could always do the decent thing and split everything 3 ways....
That's not what the father wanted though is it smile
Yep. There's a story there, that we aren't party to, that explains his wishes. Having been an executor I can tell you that your first duty is to the deceased's will and intentions.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Don said:
Yep. There's a story there, that we aren't party to, that explains his wishes. Having been an executor I can tell you that your first duty is to the deceased's will and intentions.
But as a beneficiary you can do what is morally right with your siblings.

OddCat

2,828 posts

201 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
If my parents 'fell out' with my brother and left everything to me then, unless he was a crack head who couldnt be trusted with money (I which case I'd create a trust), or maybe a child murderer (or something similarly unforgivably awful), he'd be getting 50% regardless.....

TwigtheWonderkid

49,130 posts

180 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
OddCat said:
If my parents 'fell out' with my brother and left everything to me then, unless he was a crack head who couldnt be trusted with money (I which case I'd create a trust), or maybe a child murderer (or something similarly unforgivably awful), he'd be getting 50% regardless.....
Why? Don't you parents' wishes count for anything.

Mate of mine is potentially in this situation with his wife. She is close to parents, but parents have been "no contact" with the other daughter for 15 years.

Now his wife speaks to her sister. They're not best buddies but aren't enemies either. Sister has made some poor choices re men and has 2 kids with 2 dads, neither of whom are around anymore. Parents' will leaves 100% to my mates wife. And they aren't poor. Nice house, holiday home etc.

The sister kind of assumes she is getting half regardless, but mates sister has no intention of splitting it with her. hehe It's her parents' money, and they want her to have it in full, so that's what she is going to do.

mathmos

769 posts

204 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
OddCat said:
If my parents 'fell out' with my brother and left everything to me then, unless he was a crack head who couldnt be trusted with money (I which case I'd create a trust), or maybe a child murderer (or something similarly unforgivably awful), he'd be getting 50% regardless.....
Why? Don't you parents' wishes count for anything.

Mate of mine is potentially in this situation with his wife. She is close to parents, but parents have been "no contact" with the other daughter for 15 years.

Now his wife speaks to her sister. They're not best buddies but aren't enemies either. Sister has made some poor choices re men and has 2 kids with 2 dads, neither of whom are around anymore. Parents' will leaves 100% to my mates wife. And they aren't poor. Nice house, holiday home etc.

The sister kind of assumes she is getting half regardless, but mates sister has no intention of splitting it with her. hehe It's her parents' money, and they want her to have it in full, so that's what she is going to do.
No, I do t think so, the person with a will can express wishes but once they have passed on it's entirely up to the recipient, whatever was willed is now theirs and up to them what they do with it.

Of course that also means they have to deal with any legal/tax issue of giving someone money or items.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
mathmos said:
No, I do t think so, the person with a will can express wishes but once they have passed on it's entirely up to the recipient, whatever was willed is now theirs and up to them what they do with it.

Of course that also means they have to deal with any legal/tax issue of giving someone money or items.
You can legally vary the bequeath so that there is no possible gifting IHT issues.

creampuff

6,511 posts

173 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
But as a beneficiary you can do what is morally right with your siblings.
It's not for anyone on this thread to say what is morally right in this situation. There is quite an unequal split, which almost certainly means something has happened in the past.

OddCat

2,828 posts

201 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
The sister kind of assumes she is getting half regardless, but mates sister has no intention of splitting it with her.
Your mates wife sounds delightful......

TwigtheWonderkid

49,130 posts

180 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
OddCat said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
The sister kind of assumes she is getting half regardless, but mates sister has no intention of splitting it with her.
Your mates wife sounds delightful......
I know, carrying out her parents' wishes......diabolical.

steve2

1,868 posts

248 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
How can the 2 sisters demand rent pro rata after the father said that the other daughter can live there rent free ?

Kinkell

537 posts

217 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Life and death is never simple. Family history may be quietly complex so a lesson in life is to stay alert and don't get fked over by your fking siblings and the legal parasites.

AndrewCrown

2,501 posts

144 months

Monday 3rd July 2017
quotequote all
Cider...
Gosh. A lot of this depends who the executor is...is the executor your friend? If so it gets sticky...

If not, then I think it's quite straightforward, the executor can have the dwelling valued correctly..perhaps using two or three reputable independent surveyors. Take the highest valuation,...trust me it's easier that way... and the executor then pays with your friends money the minority beneficiaries fair share.. I think this is the executors call...not the beneficiaries..

I think the minority beneficiaries need a stern chat from a solicitor or the executor as to their rights at this stage...

Where there's a will there is always a war...


BlueHave

4,727 posts

138 months

Monday 3rd July 2017
quotequote all
Nothing like a death in the family and potential inheritance to get any potential vultures circling.

Seen it before, relative dies and some relative no one has ever met turns up to the funeral and within a few weeks they are attempting to worm their way into the equation.

I remember going to the funeral of a grandparent at their house a few years ago. Immediate family only in the house and some woman turned up with her daughter and sat right down in the main room. Nobody had a clue who they were but nobody made enquiries until after the main event.

Turns out they were the grandparents brothers cousin or something and for the next few months they made several attempts to find out if their was any money coming their way.

Don

28,378 posts

314 months

Monday 3rd July 2017
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
But as a beneficiary you can do what is morally right with your siblings.
Who's to say what is morally "correct". Clearly there were reasons. We don't know what they were/are.