Is it legal to ask a bloke not to wear make up in work?
Is it legal to ask a bloke not to wear make up in work?
Author
Discussion

Prof Prolapse

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

220 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
I tried asking this in employment and a few suggested I try here instead...

It's academic. Basically I was in work the other day, and had nail varnish on owing to a fancy dress work event the night before and a lack of remover. It was taken with either in a positive manner (or ambivalence) so I have no concerns professionally. I am however curious about the legalities of it.

I often work at home and in hospitals, with occasional trips to the office where it's "office attire". It's a very large, extremely successful company, but dress code has only ever been implied verbally, there are no dress policies, and there is nothing in my contract regarding dress codes. I am fairly certain of this. If something exists it is buried in another policy and only will state "office attire" or similar.

So if a bloke turns up at the office wearing nail varnish, to a standard that would be considered acceptable to female colleagues, can your employer insist you remove it without falling foul of any legislation?

Conversely, if there was a dress code policy that implicitly stated men could not wear make up, is this acceptable from a legal stand point?








FlyingFin

176 posts

161 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
What has this got to do with Speed, Plod and the Law??

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
If a woman is permitted to, then arguably so must a man be.

Wacky Racer

41,363 posts

277 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
FlyingFin said:
What has this got to do with Speed, Plod and the Law??
OP said:-


is this acceptable from a legal stand point?

devnull

3,865 posts

187 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Did you just assume his gender?

Jonno02

2,262 posts

139 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Unless there's reason not to. I.e. at my work, clean room staff aren't allowed to wear rings with a jewel in them; only plain. Whereas office workers can wear anything. But if they turned around and said "Males can wear rings with jewels, but females can't" there'd be sexist uproar.

So no, I can't see it being legal; unless it's a rule for everybody.

thescamper

920 posts

256 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
An employer can ask, but cannot demand unless it is specifically excluded by legislation.

Also if asked it depends on how much you want to rock the boat what your response would be. No point in being bloody minded just for the sake of it.

a

439 posts

114 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
devnull said:
Did you just assume his gender?

Prof Prolapse

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

220 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Jonno02 said:
Unless there's reason not to. I.e. at my work, clean room staff aren't allowed to wear rings with a jewel in them; only plain. Whereas office workers can wear anything. But if they turned around and said "Males can wear rings with jewels, but females can't" there'd be sexist uproar.

So no, I can't see it being legal; unless it's a rule for everybody.
I think some forms of discrimination are legal but agree in this case any justification to dress in a certain way would seem to be just as a result of just being a heterosexual male and perceptions on their appearance, which seems a bit off?

I mean presumably HR can't just say "Are you covered by LGBT? If not you cannot wear make up", after all I thought the whole point was sexuality identity/orientation wasn't supposed to be relevant?

Pothole

34,367 posts

312 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
FlyingFin said:
What has this got to do with Speed, Plod and the Law??
OP said:
I tried asking this in employment and a few suggested I try here instead...

Prof Prolapse

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

220 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
devnull said:
Did you just assume his gender?
I prefer the gender neutrality offered by "sher" and "shim".



speedking31

3,931 posts

166 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
devnull said:
Did you just assume his gender?
Does
OP's thread title said:
Bloke
apply to females these days?

Dave Hedgehog

16,340 posts

234 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse said:
devnull said:
Did you just assume his gender?
I prefer the gender neutrality offered by "sher" and "shim".
shim150?

Angrybiker

557 posts

120 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
devnull said:
Did you just assume his gender?
His gender? How do you know that's her pronoun?


See how ridiculous this all gets

HD Adam

5,155 posts

214 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse said:
I Basically I was in work the other day, and had nail varnish on owing to a fancy dress work event the night before and a lack of remover.
And you reckon Harley riders are the gheyers? Worst excuse evah Prof biggrin

But from a legal point of view, I don't think you can discriminate.

You can have a dress code though.

Personally, it wouldn't bother me if any of my blokes turned up doing the full Eddie Izzard but customers might not see it that way, hence the work rules.

a

439 posts

114 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Wasn't there something last year about a company in London requiring women to wear high heels, and it was ruled that it's OK for them to make that a condition?

Dog Star

17,610 posts

198 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
HD Adam said:
Personally, it wouldn't bother me if any of my blokes turned up doing the full Eddie Izzard but customers might not see it that way, hence the work rules.
I was seriously considering this when I was working in my local job centre plus back in 2009. I didn't need the job, but it was fascinating and close to home over a snowy winter. However my boss was this dreadful horrible smelly and very thick woman who as far as I could tell had got her job to fill some kind of quota. I loved annoying her.

I was giving very serious consideration to turning up to work looking completely normal but wearing a pink frock - this is the civil service so right up there on the inclusive/embracing/diverse right-on bandwagon. I don't think there is anything that they could have done, and it would probably have made the benefit claimant's day (or "customers" as we called them).

I never did it though. frown

Prof Prolapse

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

220 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
HD Adam said:
And you reckon Harley riders are the gheyers? Worst excuse evah Prof biggrin
Still rather dress like a woman than a Hell's Angel Adam! biglaugh


jonobigblind

877 posts

112 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Not the done thing to ask a chap to remove it nowadays. Organisations like Stonewall and the variety of LGBT teams / task forces are doing their best to stop any discrimination and getting some good traction with it.

We’ve got a chap that wears nail polish and what look like pop socks under his trousers but I’m not asking if they go all the way up or not haha.

The powers that be have even added a new sign to our disabled toilet doors to also labelled them as gender neutral toilets too.

Some companies / industries will be lagging behind others but can’t see that they can all hold out much longer

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 3rd November 2017
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse said:
...

So if a bloke turns up at the office wearing nail varnish, to a standard that would be considered acceptable to female colleagues, can your employer insist you remove it without falling foul of any legislation?

Conversely, if there was a dress code policy that implicitly stated men could not wear make up, is this acceptable from a legal stand point?
1, No.

2. Surely you mean explicitly. The answer is again no.

Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 5th November 06:38