Small claim advice
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
A business I completed work for is disputing the quality of workmanship, I believe they have sabotaged it but can't prove it. They have said they will take me to court over it, the work was completed 3 years ago (welding), I believe they are hoping il cough up and give them money of some degree.

Any of you chaps able to advise what type of court this would be heard in - (civil?) ? Small claims? Anyone else been down this road and represented themselves? The bill for the work originally was £5500 - they havent stated how much % they want in compensation. The 'fault' they claim looks like someone has purposely cracked it with a hammer but refuse for me to inspect the work (pictures sent only on email). They said they have since had another company in and rectified the work and want me to pay for the bill plus give them compensation on the original work!

What happens in cases like this? Is it luck of the drawer for what the judge will say on the day? As it is his word against mine and I can't prove anything.


kiethton

14,651 posts

210 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
I think you'd be fine if you rebut the claim on a few accounts:

The work was done 3 years ago, what would be a reasonable period of time for this to last? - how long do you normally warrant work for?
They did not give you a reasonable opportunity to inspect or rectify any issues - pretty fundamental really

Was the customer a business or private individual?

ETA - not a lawyer but this would be my starting point for defending something.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Business, it is a local council. I strongly believe the person bringing the 'claim' has purposely sabotaged the work and has a personal grudge against me.

Work is warrantied for 1 year. Item would be expected to last around 5 - 8 years.

Yes the fact they havent allowed me to inspect it and have got somebody else in goes against them.

The last contact I had they said they were sending it to their "legal department". Im hoping that if it does go to them then I can talk face to face with someone and they will see sense.

mgv8

1,657 posts

301 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
dba3087108 said:
Business, "legal department"..
That should be the end of it.


SLCZ3

1,293 posts

235 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Was there any specific "standard/code" that the work was to be done to, did they review/approve your method/work statement for the welding you did, did they specify any specific welding qualification that was needed?.
Do you still have a copy of the contract or information on what they wanted welding up??

James TiT

234 posts

116 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
What system of Inspections do they use, or did they use can you recall?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
^ the work was not reviewed by them at all (was on a first floor roof).
By paying me originally are they not to be deemed that the work was satisfactory?

I'm looking forward to getting a call off their legal dept. If it ever reaches that stage.

hondansx

4,700 posts

255 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Er, don't you have liability insurance?