Car sold but cancelling insurance is gonna cost me.
Car sold but cancelling insurance is gonna cost me.
Author
Discussion

croyde

Original Poster:

26,406 posts

260 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
A month to go so I know I'll get nothing back but when I call and cancel it's going to cost me £37.50.

Surely this means loads of cars are insured twice as I'd imagine many won't want to lose more money.

What's the Law's view on this?

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
I'd be very surprised if they charged you. Who is the insurer/broker?

If they did I would take them to ombudsman just so they have to pay the fee.

Jazoli

9,662 posts

280 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Quite normal to be honest, I'd be inclined to let the policy lapse but tell them you don't want to renew.

croyde

Original Poster:

26,406 posts

260 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
It's Privilege, so a cheap one. It's in their terms. Been with them for a few years and I do get discount as they covered both my cars and my cottage.

Remember cancelling a bike policy with Bennetts after 6 months. They worked out they owed me 30 quid but the administration charge was 45 so they billed me. I fought that one and got money back in the end.

Just a pain tho.

cuprabob

19,704 posts

244 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
I had this scenario when I sold my 2nd car and got round it by suspending the policy and when it lapsed they gave me pro-rata refund without any charges.

My insurance company was Privilege.

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
It's a load a bks and they deserve the ombudsman fees if they ask you for it.



croyde

Original Poster:

26,406 posts

260 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
cuprabob said:
I had this scenario when I sold my 2nd car and got round it by suspending the policy and when it lapsed they gave me pro-rata refund without any charges.

My insurance company was Privilege.
But they charge for the sheer audacity of calling them up so did they not charge an admin fee for daring to suspend the insurance biggrin

cuprabob

19,704 posts

244 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
croyde said:
But they charge for the sheer audacity of calling them up so did they not charge an admin fee for daring to suspend the insurance biggrin
It was actually them that suggested I suspend the policy. Once the policy had lapsed they did a pro-rata refund and no admin charges were deducted from the refund.

If I had cancelled the policy the charges woukd have exceeded the refund and it would have cost me money to cancel.


mad4amanda

2,410 posts

194 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
There have been a couple of cases where people have kept insurance running and been liable for accidents even though they no longer own the vehicle!

Initforthemoney

743 posts

174 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Really??????

You should write and complain and demand an explanation from the MD.

biggrin

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

194 months

Red Devil

13,518 posts

238 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
Initforthemoney said:
Really??????
yes - https://www.rac.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?19031-c...
Looks like one of the posters on that thread is on here too (same username).


OddCat

2,828 posts

201 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
mad4amanda said:
That is absolutely mental ! Surely the vendors insurance no longer covered the vehicle once he didn't own it any more ?

mickmcpaddy

1,445 posts

135 months

Saturday 25th November 2017
quotequote all
If you were on the hook for something like this, maybe being liable if the insurers came after you personally, surely you would lie through your back teeth and swear blind you notified them of a cancellation, maybe by letter or you rang up and told Sheila or whichever dizzy bh you supposedly spoke to. Sometimes people are just too eager to tell the truth.

Every solicitor in the world will say never ever volunteer information, especially without seeking legal advice first.

Drawweight

3,599 posts

146 months

Sunday 26th November 2017
quotequote all
I had a no fault accident in which my personal injuries claim dragged on for 2 years.

When it was eventually settled I thought I’d tell my insurance company that it was all sorted.

‘Thanks for informing us Mr Drawweight that’ll be 35 quid to update our records’

I was so stunned that I paid it then mentioned it later on a post that R Loon was contributing to and he told me to get on to them and I got it refunded.

‘Don’t tell them Pike’

chrisgtx

1,346 posts

240 months

Sunday 26th November 2017
quotequote all
I got caught for this the other week too, well my better half as I sort out all car stuff.
My Mrs sold her car to a guy from France.
The insurance only had 4 weeks left to run. So I rang them out of courtesy to let them know it was sold so to stop the insurance. I knew she’d get nothing back.
That’ll be £30 please for cancelling the policy!! Like a bloody mug I paid it.
So if I moan now can I get it back?

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

194 months

Sunday 26th November 2017
quotequote all
mickmcpaddy said:
If you were on the hook for something like this, maybe being liable if the insurers came after you personally, surely you would lie through your back teeth and swear blind you notified them of a cancellation, maybe by letter or you rang up and told Sheila or whichever dizzy bh you supposedly spoke to. Sometimes people are just too eager to tell the truth.

Every solicitor in the world will say never ever volunteer information, especially without seeking legal advice first.
probably why insurers record all calls now and send you a confirmation letter

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Sunday 26th November 2017
quotequote all
OddCat said:
mad4amanda said:
That is absolutely mental ! Surely the vendors insurance no longer covered the vehicle once he didn't own it any more ?
1. How did they know?
2. No, because they were still the MID insurer of record, because the policy was still active.

vikingaero

13,361 posts

199 months

Sunday 26th November 2017
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
OddCat said:
mad4amanda said:
That is absolutely mental ! Surely the vendors insurance no longer covered the vehicle once he didn't own it any more ?
1. How did they know?
2. No, because they were still the MID insurer of record, because the policy was still active.
If there is an active Policy on a car that is involved in an accident, even if the driver was drunk/stoned/banned and not the Policyholder or named driver, then the Police under certain sections (can't remember which sections as it's been a long time since I worked for Insurers) of the Road Traffic Act can treat the Policy as though cover is in force.

It seems wacko and barmy to us mere normal folk and is one of the dangers of leaving a Policy active or dual insurance in place.

The Mad Monk

11,507 posts

147 months

Sunday 26th November 2017
quotequote all
croyde said:
A month to go so I know I'll get nothing back but when I call and cancel it's going to cost me £37.50.

Surely this means loads of cars are insured twice as I'd imagine many won't want to lose more money.

What's the Law's view on this?
I don't get it?

What happens if you let the insurance run to the end of the contracted year and then don't renew it with them?

That won't cost you anything. Will it? Shirley?