Privacy?
Author
Discussion

Higgs boson

Original Poster:

1,105 posts

183 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
Guys, I would value some opinions, please.
I was at a training course, at a venue that has an online presence (social media).
During the course, an admin member of the training company came into the room and took a photo of the candidates and the trainer (a single photo).
When asked what the photo was for, the reply was that it was going on Facebook to show the participation in that particular course.
None of the candidates were asked if they minded this happening. I was slightly surprised, as there are probably some privacy issues, but not really bothered.
So, what do you think? Was this acceptable?
Ta.

J2daG1990

1,217 posts

156 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
Higgs boson said:
Guys, I would value some opinions, please.
I was at a training course, at a venue that has an online presence (social media).
During the course, an admin member of the training company came into the room and took a photo of the candidates and the trainer (a single photo).
When asked what the photo was for, the reply was that it was going on Facebook to show the participation in that particular course.
None of the candidates were asked if they minded this happening. I was slightly surprised, as there are probably some privacy issues, but not really bothered.
So, what do you think? Was this acceptable?
Ta.
Acceptable, but you have the right to ask that the photo of you not be posted.
Or, if they do post it online, you can always flag it and ask it be removed.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

148 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
Wouldn't bother me at all from a legal standpoint.

However in terms of a moral one it would have been polite to ask.


singlecoil

35,831 posts

276 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
If it didn't bother you then there's nothing for you to be bothered about. It was, however, a colossal cheek and you would have been quite entitled to remove the camera from the offender, delete the photo, smash the camera up and made the offender eat the parts.

mikeveal

5,121 posts

280 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
J2daG1990 said:
Acceptable, but you have the right to ask that the photo of you not be posted.
Or, if they do post it online, you can always flag it and ask it be removed.
You have the right to ask, but you can rarely stop them. Anyone can take a photo of anyone else in a public space, on privately owned land the proprietor can disallow this.
You have some rights to privacy concerning the publication of the photo, but not an automatic right to prohibit it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_and_the_...

IAAAP, IANAL.

ozzuk

1,456 posts

157 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
Is this what society has come to? If you are concerned about this did you ask them why? If not, does it really matter? Perhaps it is buried in the T&Cs for your training, perhaps they thought you wouldn't mind. Under GDPR they should have gained consent (unless in their terms) but should also make it easy to remove consent.

Not exactly a major issue.

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
OMG First World non-problems vol 947!

You had no reasonable expectation of privacy when attending the event.

feef

5,209 posts

213 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
You'll probably find that there was a clause in the Ts and Cs of registering that they may take photos and use them for their marketing purposes. It's not uncommon

pavarotti1980

6,347 posts

114 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
OMG First World non-problems vol 947!

You had no reasonable expectation of privacy when attending the event.
You always come across as a right sanctimonious prick

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
Breadvan72 said:
OMG First World non-problems vol 947!

You had no reasonable expectation of privacy when attending the event.
You always come across as a right sanctimonious prick
Are you saying he's wrong?

pavarotti1980

6,347 posts

114 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Are you saying he's wrong?
Im not saying anything either way

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
Breadvan72 said:
OMG First World non-problems vol 947!

You had no reasonable expectation of privacy when attending the event.
You always come across as a right sanctimonious prick
I am sorry that you find a correct statement of the law (using the same language as that used in the case law) disconsoling. (OK, I'm not really).

pavarotti1980

6,347 posts

114 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
I am sorry that you find a correct statement of the law (using the same language as that used in the case law) disconsoling. (OK, I'm not really).
thanks for proving my point clap

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
Just go to the next one like this, problem solved:


strain

419 posts

131 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
Been a few instances of the company I work for wanting to take photos of happy staff, one was a cake sale last week.

The guy who runs the social media is Ok I have known him for a few years, so when he tries to take a photo with me in it I just say ' GDPR bh' and he laughs and walks away.

Pretty sure it may fall under GDPR if you are within a photo, right to be removed?

IANAL and dont have the first clue when it comes to it

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
Breadvan72 said:
I am sorry that you find a correct statement of the law (using the same language as that used in the case law) disconsoling. (OK, I'm not really).
thanks for proving my point clap
Bless the poor little snowflake. He has sad feels.

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
cb1965 said:
Just go to the next one like this, problem solved:

That works for me when I go on a date.

WinstonWolf

72,863 posts

269 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
Breadvan72 said:
OMG First World non-problems vol 947!

You had no reasonable expectation of privacy when attending the event.
You always come across as a right sanctimonious prick
I quite like his forthright manner...

pavarotti1980

6,347 posts

114 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Bless the poor little snowflake. He has sad feels.
Far from it. hehe


anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
strain said:
Been a few instances of the company I work for wanting to take photos of happy staff, one was a cake sale last week.

The guy who runs the social media is Ok I have known him for a few years, so when he tries to take a photo with me in it I just say ' GDPR bh' and he laughs and walks away.

Pretty sure it may fall under GDPR if you are within a photo, right to be removed?

IANAL and dont have the first clue when it comes to it
A photo of a person contains personal data because from the photo the ID of a person can often be obtained. The GDPR does not apply to personal and family photos, but will usually apply in a business context. GDPR is not, however, a bar on the collection or use of data. it is about safeguards as to how data is processed.