MOT question
Author
Discussion

Bobtherallyfan

Original Poster:

1,515 posts

108 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Honest John in today’s Telegraph started that you can’t legally drive a car which has failed its MOT, even though the previous MOT hadn’t run out. I thought that was only true if the fail was something listed as dangerous? I’m waiting for a part to arrive, the failure being listed a ‘major’ and the garage said the car was perfectly safe to drive in the mean time. As it happens I only needed to drive it a few hundred yards and it can sit on the drive for a few days. Is HJ or my garage correct?

craigjm

21,474 posts

230 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
HJ is correct. As soon as you have your car tested and it fails the remaining time on the old certificate is invalid. You can drive it home legallay though as long as the fault isn’t dangerous. You are allowed to drive the car to and from a pre booked test


Edited by craigjm on Saturday 16th February 17:12

Pericoloso

44,044 posts

193 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
That ^^^^ is the opposite of what I've just read.
Can't do a link on the phone.

You can be prosecuted if stopped and vehicle is deemed unroadworthy.

craigjm

21,474 posts

230 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all

Retroman

975 posts

163 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
HJ is correct. As soon as you have your car tested and it fails the remaining time on the old certificate is invalid.
Edited by craigjm on Saturday 16th February 17:12
That's not correct. If there is time remaining on the current MOT it remains valid.
However you may still be breaking the law for driving a vehicle with a defect regardless if the MOT is still valid.

Cliftonite

8,744 posts

168 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Retroman said:
craigjm said:
HJ is correct. As soon as you have your car tested and it fails the remaining time on the old certificate is invalid.
Edited by craigjm on Saturday 16th February 17:12
That's not correct. If there is time remaining on the current MOT it remains valid.
However you may still be breaking the law for driving a vehicle with a defect regardless if the MOT is still valid.
Retroman is spot on.

It has been weeks since this question was last asked. PH is losing its touch!


Brads67

3,199 posts

128 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Retroman said:
That's not correct. If there is time remaining on the current MOT it remains valid.
However you may still be breaking the law for driving a vehicle with a defect regardless if the MOT is still valid.
Almost correct.

There are listed faults classed as dangerous. If your car fails due to a dangerous fault you cannot drive it away from the MOT station.

Minor faults mean you can as long as the old MOT is still valid.

Bobtherallyfan

Original Poster:

1,515 posts

108 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Dangerous = No
Minor = OK
Major = God knows

Seems a perfect example of badly written legislation that even Forum regulars disagree.

craigjm

21,474 posts

230 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Bobtherallyfan said:
Dangerous = No
Minor = OK
Major = God knows

Seems a perfect example of badly written legislation that even Forum regulars disagree.
I think my screenshot above of the gov site makes it’s quite clear. Dangerous is the only problem

Bobtherallyfan

Original Poster:

1,515 posts

108 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
I think my screenshot above of the gov site makes it’s quite clear. Dangerous is the only problem
So the result is Honest John 0, Garage 1


Cold

16,708 posts

120 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
Almost correct.

There are listed faults classed as dangerous. If your car fails due to a dangerous fault you cannot drive it away from the MOT station.

Minor faults mean you can as long as the old MOT is still valid.
Who at the MOT station is authorised to stop a car from being driven away?

Retroman

975 posts

163 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
Almost correct.

There are listed faults classed as dangerous. If your car fails due to a dangerous fault you cannot drive it away from the MOT station.

Minor faults mean you can as long as the old MOT is still valid.
Incorrect on the first part. If it's a dangerous fail they can mark it as that, but they have no power to prevent you from driving the vehicle if you choose to.

Nothing you have said seems to make what i said initially incorrect.

Brads67

3,199 posts

128 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Retroman said:
Incorrect on the first part. If it's a dangerous fail they can mark it as that, but they have no power to prevent you from driving the vehicle if you choose to.

Nothing you have said seems to make what i said initially incorrect.
They cannot stop you but you will be breaking the law by driving it. So no, not incorrect on any part. .

DuraAce

4,272 posts

190 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
Who at the MOT station is authorised to stop a car from being driven away?
Nobody as I understand it. They cannot impound it.

My car is my property, if I wish to remove it from a garage/mot station regardless of mot pass/fail then I will do so.

Cold

16,708 posts

120 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
They cannot stop you but you will be breaking the law by driving it. So no, not incorrect on any part. .
But then, the car was most likely unroadworthy in the weeks/months leading up to the MOT test too unless the fault(s) mysteriously appeared as soon as the car was put on the ramp.
The MOT test won't change that status, it will just highlight any potential issues to the driver.

Aretnap

1,969 posts

181 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
They cannot stop you but you will be breaking the law by driving it.
You wouldn't be breaking the law by driving it though - or at least you wouldn't necessarily be breaking it.

Despite what the gov.uk website says, there has been no change in the underlying legisation. The offence is using "a motor vehicle... as respects which no test certificate has been issued within the appropriate period before that time". In other words, using a motor vehicle which has not passed an MOT test in the last year. If it's passed a test in the last year then there is no MOT offence and there is still no mechanism for the old certificate to be revoked, regardless of what defects the tester finds, or whether he records them as dangerous.

The other relevant offence is using a vehicle in a dangerous condition. And obviously if your car had a dangerous defect, you would be committing that offence. However that depends on whether your car does actually have a dangerous defect - not on whether a particular mechanic on a particular day said it did. MOT testers are not infallible, and I've even heard that there are some dodgy ones who fail cars on dubious points just to drum up business for their garages. So if the tester fails your car and tells you that it has four bald tyres, petrol leaking from the tank and brake pads worn down to the rivets then if you think he's talking bks you can drive it away perfectly legally - but only if you're right.

If the dangerous failure is recorded on a central database then I suppose your chances of being stopped while driving it would be greater than they were. But to prosecute you the police would still have to prove that it actually was in a dangerous condition - they couldn't just rely on the record of the MOT failure. Maybe the tester just got it wrong. Or maybe you'd fixed the defect since the test but you hadn't got around to getting a retest yet. Either way you could plausibly be driving legally.

(I'm not recommending that you actually do drive a car which has been failed as dangerous of course - just pointing out that it is not automatically illegal. And the government website isn't going to recommend it either - hence the sightly misleading implication that driving it is illegal in itself.)




Aretnap

1,969 posts

181 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Bobtherallyfan said:
Honest John in today’s Telegraph started that you can’t legally drive a car which has failed its MOT, even though the previous MOT hadn’t run out. I thought that was only true if the fail was something listed as dangerous? I’m waiting for a part to arrive, the failure being listed a ‘major’ and the garage said the car was perfectly safe to drive in the mean time. As it happens I only needed to drive it a few hundred yards and it can sit on the drive for a few days. Is HJ or my garage correct?
Honest John writes some total tosh at times. There's a long thread on MSE detailing his, erm, idiosyncratic views on car insurance.

Gareth79

9,050 posts

276 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Regardless of whether the car is legal to drive after the failure THE OLD MOT IS STILL VALID.

For example

- You take your car for an MOT a month before the old one expires
- Your car fails its MOT on a blown headlamp bulb
- You replace the bulb outside the MOT garage, but do not get it retested
- You are 100% legal to drive the car until the old MOT expires

Whether the car has failed an MOT makes no difference to the legality of driving it with a fault, it may make it easier to prove that the driver was aware of it though.



Edited by Gareth79 on Saturday 16th February 19:45

M_A_S

1,441 posts

215 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
Retroman said:
Incorrect on the first part. If it's a dangerous fail they can mark it as that, but they have no power to prevent you from driving the vehicle if you choose to.

Nothing you have said seems to make what i said initially incorrect.
They cannot stop you but you will be breaking the law by driving it. So no, not incorrect on any part. .
You were breaking exactly the same laws driving it to the MOT station as you were leaving.

Eddieslofart

1,328 posts

113 months

Saturday 16th February 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
I think my screenshot above of the gov site makes it’s quite clear. Dangerous is the only problem
Indeed. Answers the question perfectly.