Claims management companies - shouldn't it be regulated?
Claims management companies - shouldn't it be regulated?
Author
Discussion

davek_964

Original Poster:

11,268 posts

204 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
I know it's been mentioned on many accident threads, but the car hire charges from these companies is insane.

My colleague used one 11 months ago - a skip company dropped some rubble on his VW Golf, which meant he needed a new bumper. Skip companies insurer paid, but the repairer recommended my colleague use a claim management company to handle it / arrange courtesy car, which he did. Car was repaired, no cost to my colleague, everybody's happy......

He's now shopping around for car insurance, and needs to give the value of the claim for any quotes - even though it's non fault. So he logged into the claim management site to see what the total cost was.

Car repair : £2,900
Hire car (he had a Vaxhaull Insignia for 2 weeks) : ~£24,000!

Case is closed so presumably the skip insurers paid. An almost £28k bill to put a new bumper on a £15k Golf.

When I had a non-fault accident last year, the third party insurers offered me a like for like car - and a Ferrari would have cost ~£600 a day inc vat. So the claim management company have charged about 3 times that for a Vaxhaull Insignia.

Surely there needs to be some kind of regulation here? It's even worse than the fake medical stuff people seem to claim for.

edthefed

827 posts

96 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
My sister in law (against my advice) has just used a claims management company.

They provided her with a basic Corsa..charged at £84 per day plus £213 to deliver and collect it.

Claims company kept telling her "no rush keep it as long as you like" !

Her car is a right off. On receipt of that news she bought a new car (upgrade on right off) before getting the insurance settlement.

Claims company not happy she acted so quickly and returned the Corsa...asking dont you want to keep it longer.



robinessex

12,012 posts

210 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
Not just cars. Last year, a fault on my boiler was heading towards plus £500, the max I was allowed, to fix. Told the insurance company to stop, I'd get my own plumber, and send them the bill. The actual bit broken cost £3.46 (microswitch). Labour was the minimum 1hr callout at £50. I won't mention all the supposed faults that the insurance company plumber claimed needed fixing!!

Countdown

49,431 posts

225 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
I know it's been mentioned on many accident threads, but the car hire charges from these companies is insane.

My colleague used one 11 months ago - a skip company dropped some rubble on his VW Golf, which meant he needed a new bumper. Skip companies insurer paid, but the repairer recommended my colleague use a claim management company to handle it / arrange courtesy car, which he did. Car was repaired, no cost to my colleague, everybody's happy......

He's now shopping around for car insurance, and needs to give the value of the claim for any quotes - even though it's non fault. So he logged into the claim management site to see what the total cost was.

Car repair : £2,900
Hire car (he had a Vaxhaull Insignia for 2 weeks) : ~£24,000!

Case is closed so presumably the skip insurers paid. An almost £28k bill to put a new bumper on a £15k Golf.

When I had a non-fault accident last year, the third party insurers offered me a like for like car - and a Ferrari would have cost ~£600 a day inc vat. So the claim management company have charged about 3 times that for a Vaxhaull Insignia.

Surely there needs to be some kind of regulation here? It's even worse than the fake medical stuff people seem to claim for.
I stand to be corrected but what the AMC claim from the InsCo isn't necessarily what the InsCo pay. £24k for a 2 week hire is clearly ridiculous. My guess is that the InsCo may have paid something like £200/day.

Ian Geary

5,614 posts

221 months

Friday 7th June 2019
quotequote all
robinessex said:
Not just cars. Last year, a fault on my boiler was heading towards plus £500, the max I was allowed, to fix. Told the insurance company to stop, I'd get my own plumber, and send them the bill. The actual bit broken cost £3.46 (microswitch). Labour was the minimum 1hr callout at £50. I won't mention all the supposed faults that the insurance company plumber claimed needed fixing!!
Surely that's heading into fraud territory...

However, money talks, and lobbyists walk...in and out of funding meetings with political parties. Doubt it will get changed any time soon

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
I might be being stupid here but what's the point in accident management companies when we pay a premium to the insurance company to deal with it all?

Sheepshanks

41,040 posts

148 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Countdown said:
I stand to be corrected but what the AMC claim from the InsCo isn't necessarily what the InsCo pay. £24k for a 2 week hire is clearly ridiculous. My guess is that the InsCo may have paid something like £200/day.
This - there's a scale of rates agreed between the insurance companies.

There's probably a typo or something in the number - what would be the point of even trying to claim £24K for 2 weeks hire? No insurer would pay that.

Mr Tidy

31,483 posts

156 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
Back in January 2010 I was driving to work through some snow and was about 300 yards from the office car park entrance when I had to give way at a mini-roundabout and got hit by the car behind me.

I remember thinking "this will be a nightmare" but when I spoke to the other driver it turned out he was a work colleague who had a company car, so that was a relief!

Later that day I went to see the dozy bint "administering" the company car scheme who wasn't interested, and told me I had to claim from my insurer - pretty moronic comment seeing as we were all working for an insurance company! banghead (I took the car allowance so mine wasn't on the fleet policy).

I had no intention of claiming on my policy and having an outstanding claim for however long it took to get settled.

Anyway as my car was still in warranty I took it to my local main agent to get a quote and they introduced me to a Claims Management Company, so I signed up!

A day later the company fleet insurer called me, but by then it was too late.

The CMC experience was great - I took my car to the main agent and the courtesy car was in the car park ready and waiting, but it really shouldn't take 5 days to paint and fit a rear bumper!

The hire car claim ended up being more than the repair, so CMCs do seem to milk it somewhat.

But as I had opted out of the Company Car scheme I was expected to have access to a car, so I needed the hire car as I had 2 business meetings in Dorset that week (my employer was in Berkshire so I wasn't going to do that by public transport)!

So although I found it really convenient, it does seem to inflate costs - which we all end up paying for.



KungFuPanda

4,640 posts

199 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
Most CHO are regulated in so far as they are signed up to the ABI GTA which gives agreed rates on daily credit hire.

See rates here:

https://www.gtacredithire.com/rates/car-hire/

anxious_ant

2,626 posts

108 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
Something is not right about the figure, I could hire an Insignia for way less than 24k for 2 weeks.

mmm-five

12,362 posts

313 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
But as I had opted out of the Company Car scheme I was expected to have access to a car, so I needed the hire car as I had 2 business meetings in Dorset that week (my employer was in Berkshire so I wasn't going to do that by public transport)!
But, did you do anything to mitigate your costs?

i.e. did you really need a 'credit hire' car at extortionate rates or were you in a financial position to be able to afford a hire car from Enterprise/Avis/Hertz hire car to do the job equally well for a fraction of the cost?

That's the question I had to answer in my court documents - and provide bank/credit card statements to back up my claim that I couldn't hire one myself as I was in financial trouble at the time (and the car involved in the accident was also up for sale at the time).

btw, the e9x M3 I was given for a couple of weeks was £350/day)

Edited by mmm-five on Sunday 9th June 11:29

KungFuPanda

4,640 posts

199 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
Mr Tidy said:
But as I had opted out of the Company Car scheme I was expected to have access to a car, so I needed the hire car as I had 2 business meetings in Dorset that week (my employer was in Berkshire so I wasn't going to do that by public transport)!
But, did you do anything to mitigate your costs?

i.e. did you really need a 'credit hire' car at extortionate rates or were you in a financial position to be able to afford a hire car from Enterprise/Avis/Hertz hire car to do the job equally well for a fraction of the cost?

That's the question I had to answer in my court documents - and provide bank/credit card statements to back up my claim that I couldn't hire one myself as I was in financial trouble at the time (and the car involved in the accident was also up for sale at the time).

btw, the e9x M3 I was given for a couple of weeks was £350/day)

Edited by mmm-five on Sunday 9th June 11:29
Did you need an M3 on credit hire though?

Oakey

27,981 posts

245 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
Someone rear ended my brother in laws brand new 1 series in January and he ended up using a CMC who gave him a brand new Audi (A3 I think) as a courtesy car at a rate of about £200 a day. He had it 5 months!

At about the 2 or 3 month mark he rang his insurer to find out wtf was going on only to be told they knew nothing about his accident or claim!

Sheepshanks

41,040 posts

148 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
Oakey said:
At about the 2 or 3 month mark he rang his insurer to find out wtf was going on only to be told they knew nothing about his accident or claim!
I might be missing something, but why would they?

rscott

17,489 posts

220 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
My MX5 got reversed into while parked and I used Mazda Assist to sort it (at first the other driver tried to deny responsibility!) .

Of course, a like for like hire car was provided - BMW 318d via Enterprise.
I sent that back - didn't see the need for that, plus it wasn't great to drive (base spec, handled horribly on the poorly surfaced country roads around here) and requested something more basic like a Fiesta or Focus.
They sent me an Auris, with no screenwash, muddy carpets and a broken bonnet release, then swapped that for a Focus estate..

Wasn't impressed with Enterprise at all, especially as they tried to submit credit hire documents for a 318d class vehicle for the entire hire period. Ended up complaining to their central customer services, who sorted it very promptly and seemed somewhat embarrassed by it all.

Local branch even tried to charge me for a chipped windscreen on the Auris because their inspection sheet showed it was perfect. It was only when I pointed out the sheet also said they'd cleaned the car and refilled the screenwash that they waived the fee.

JP18

109 posts

90 months

Sunday 9th June 2019
quotequote all
anxious_ant said:
Something is not right about the figure, I could hire an Insignia for way less than 24k for 2 weeks.
Hire?
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...

davek_964

Original Poster:

11,268 posts

204 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
Countdown said:
I stand to be corrected but what the AMC claim from the InsCo isn't necessarily what the InsCo pay. £24k for a 2 week hire is clearly ridiculous. My guess is that the InsCo may have paid something like £200/day.
This - there's a scale of rates agreed between the insurance companies.

There's probably a typo or something in the number - what would be the point of even trying to claim £24K for 2 weeks hire? No insurer would pay that.
It would be interesting to know what the real cost was then - I guess even though it's a no fault claim, having a £27k claim in the last year is quite different from having a ~£5k claim.

mmm-five

12,362 posts

313 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
KungFuPanda said:
Did you need an M3 on credit hire though?
No I didn't - and I told the credit hire company that (and said the same on my court documents). I told them I would be happy with a runaround for the few weeks the repair was going to take, but I was told I could only have a 'like for like' replacement for the Z4MC, and the only M they had was the M3.

It's probably why the credit hire company was threatening me with any costs they couldn't recover from the 3rd party's insurer.

They kept sending amended statements for me to sign & return, and each time I'd change it back to the truth, and fix any other mistakes they'd managed to add (such as changing the time, date, location of the accident).

PAULJ5555

3,554 posts

205 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
Why are the other side so stupid to pay out £28,000 for a 2 week hire, does noone think this is a bit much.



davek_964

Original Poster:

11,268 posts

204 months

Monday 10th June 2019
quotequote all
Apparently, was indeed a typo - actual hire car costs were 1/10th of that. Not quite so ridiculous after all.

Having said that - he still got charged twice as much for a Vaxhaull Insignia as Direct Line told me a Ferrari would cost.