Dashcam prosecutions
Author
Discussion

RP64

Original Poster:

76 posts

116 months

Wednesday 7th August 2019
quotequote all
How many dashcam submissions from the public are resulting in action by the way of fixed penalty notices or prosecution. What approach are police taking when they receive these dashcam clips?

vonhosen

40,597 posts

246 months

Wednesday 7th August 2019
quotequote all
RP64 said:
How many dashcam submissions from the public are resulting in action by the way of fixed penalty notices or prosecution. What approach are police taking when they receive these dashcam clips?
You'll need to send a FoI request to every Police Service.

It is happening though

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=417761222296799

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 7th August 2019
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
You'll need to send a FoI request to every Police Service.

It is happening though

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=417761222296799
That was bloody dangerous!
Amazed he didn't do a bit of bird for that.

meatballs

1,140 posts

89 months

Wednesday 7th August 2019
quotequote all
Someone got a number of points from the magistrates after an attempted brake check. There's 1

Durzel

12,999 posts

197 months

Wednesday 7th August 2019
quotequote all
Given how stretched the Police are I would doubt that anything but obviously egregious and easily provable offences shown on submitted dashcam video are followed up.

That's not to say they don't receive loads of submissions from Mittys, but they aren't going to be prosecuting peoplfe based on dashcam evidence of someone wandering over the limit a bit.

Anything obviously far below the standard of a careful and competent driver though I imagine would be fair game (and rightly so).

Riley Blue

23,205 posts

255 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
RP64 said:
How many dashcam submissions from the public are resulting in action by the way of fixed penalty notices or prosecution. What approach are police taking when they receive these dashcam clips?
A Google of 'dashcam prosecutions', second link: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article-7...

ging84

9,548 posts

175 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
flashbang said:
That was bloody dangerous!
Amazed he didn't do a bit of bird for that.
The footage starts with the light on red, but I am willing to bet it's been edited down to start the exact moment it went from orange to red. So rather than showing a van randomly blasting through a red light on a crossing with people already on it, it would show a van trying to charge an orange light and getting it wrong, plus 1 pedestrian out of many chancing it by crossing as soon as he could see cars stopping at the red light rather than waiting for the green Man like the rest of them.

vonhosen

40,597 posts

246 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
ging84 said:
flashbang said:
That was bloody dangerous!
Amazed he didn't do a bit of bird for that.
The footage starts with the light on red, but I am willing to bet it's been edited down to start the exact moment it went from orange to red. So rather than showing a van randomly blasting through a red light on a crossing with people already on it, it would show a van trying to charge an orange light and getting it wrong, plus 1 pedestrian out of many chancing it by crossing as soon as he could see cars stopping at the red light rather than waiting for the green Man like the rest of them.
That's OK then.....not

ging84

9,548 posts

175 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
That's OK then.....not
That not even close to what I said, and unfortunately this is one of the very big problems with dash cams being used as evidence. You can edit them to remove the context and show the worst possible bits, and if you try and argue it wasn't as bad as the footage makes out some over zealous police officer or prosecutor will just come back with a pointless flippant comment like that, and it's really hard to argue against.

lcs_turbo

103 posts

127 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
ging84 said:
vonhosen said:
That's OK then.....not
That not even close to what I said, and unfortunately this is one of the very big problems with dash cams being used as evidence. You can edit them to remove the context and show the worst possible bits, and if you try and argue it wasn't as bad as the footage makes out some over zealous police officer or prosecutor will just come back with a pointless flippant comment like that, and it's really hard to argue against.
Some police forces request that 2 minutes of footage either side of the incident is submitted - I know that Surrey police do this

ging84

9,548 posts

175 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
lcs_turbo said:
Some police forces request that 2 minutes of footage either side of the incident is submitted - I know that Surrey police do this
That is voluntary, there is no obligation on them to collect the extra footage, or to reject anything without it.

S11Steve

6,389 posts

213 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
We are getting 3 or 4 police request per month for driver info relating to dash-cam footage received, mainly for cutting across lanes, jumping red lights and zebra crossings.

What we don't get to know is how far these end up going once we pass on the driver details, but there has been noticeable increase this year

untakenname

5,350 posts

221 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
There's probably been hundreds of cases by now, was involved in the first dashcam prosecution in the uk AFAIK (back in 2012).

I would recommend not giving the card to the police at the time of accident but instead make a backup first.

The police seized the action cam and memory card at the scene of my crash and when the CPS prosecuted the DVD they made for court worked in the magistrates court but didn't in the crown court and when they tried to get the source footage to make another one they couldn't find it, never got compensated for the price of the memory card either which was a lot back then (£200 for 32gb iirc).

Luckily for me a witness had taken pictures at the scene right after the crash which disproved the other parties version of events.

Osinjak

5,453 posts

150 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
S11Steve said:
We are getting 3 or 4 police request per month for driver info relating to dash-cam footage received, mainly for cutting across lanes, jumping red lights and zebra crossings.

What we don't get to know is how far these end up going once we pass on the driver details, but there has been noticeable increase this year
Who is 'we'?

S11Steve

6,389 posts

213 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
Osinjak said:
Who is 'we'?
The fleet management company I work for.

sgtBerbatov

2,597 posts

110 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
RP64 said:
How many dashcam submissions from the public are resulting in action by the way of fixed penalty notices or prosecution. What approach are police taking when they receive these dashcam clips?
You'll need to send a FoI request to every Police Service.

It is happening though

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=417761222296799
Christ, that's the worst I've seen.

Durzel

12,999 posts

197 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
ging84 said:
flashbang said:
That was bloody dangerous!
Amazed he didn't do a bit of bird for that.
The footage starts with the light on red, but I am willing to bet it's been edited down to start the exact moment it went from orange to red. So rather than showing a van randomly blasting through a red light on a crossing with people already on it, it would show a van trying to charge an orange light and getting it wrong, plus 1 pedestrian out of many chancing it by crossing as soon as he could see cars stopping at the red light rather than waiting for the green Man like the rest of them.
Seems like a strange hill to die on, defending a guy driving through a red light nearly hitting someone.

There were at least 3 seconds of clear red before he went through, and one would presume the noise that lets pedestrians know they can cross was going at that point.

ps. Amber also means stop (unless it's not possible to safely).

Edited by Durzel on Thursday 8th August 10:34

Osinjak

5,453 posts

150 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
S11Steve said:
Osinjak said:
Who is 'we'?
The fleet management company I work for.
Ta.

ging84

9,548 posts

175 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Seems like a strange hill to die on, defending a guy driving through a red light nearly hitting someone.

There were at least 3 seconds of clear red before he went through, and one would presume the noise that lets pedestrians know they can cross was going at that point.

ps. Amber also means stop (unless it's not possible to safely).

Edited by Durzel on Thursday 8th August 10:34
Why does it have to be that I was defending him?
I was simply pointing out that on first watch it probably looks far worse than it really was which is probably why it wasn't treated as a more serious offense.

speedking31

3,913 posts

165 months

Thursday 8th August 2019
quotequote all
S11Steve said:
We are getting 3 or 4 police request per month for driver info relating to dash-cam footage received,
Are these S.172 requests or a different system? Accompanied by a NIP?