Driver caught doing 91mph in a 30...
Driver caught doing 91mph in a 30...
Author
Discussion

Humble Pi

Original Poster:

8,995 posts

216 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
Anyone else seen this on the news today? Caught using helmet cam footage from a cyclist.

https://www.northantstelegraph.co.uk/news/crime/ru...

A police officer from that force on twitter said they send footage off to experts to calculate the speed, apparently it was a 40 page report.

https://twitter.com/northants_rpu/status/120731747...

Does anyone know exactly how they calculate it? Presumably it’s a very clever piece of computer software?

vonhosen

40,597 posts

246 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
Distance over time.

LosingGrip

8,856 posts

188 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
Speed distance time calculation.

Amazed it was 40 pages mind you! Surely just go to where it is, measure two points that can be seen in the video and time how long it takes?

I'm actually more amazed it managed to pick up the reg!

outnumbered

4,877 posts

263 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
It's only a 40 page report because Steve Callahan isn't very good at maths.

Pica-Pica

16,582 posts

113 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
LosingGrip said:
Speed distance time calculation.

Amazed it was 40 pages mind you! Surely just go to where it is, measure two points that can be seen in the video and time how long it takes?

I'm actually more amazed it managed to pick up the reg!
There were probably several d/t calculations submitted, plus several photos.

Evolved

4,079 posts

216 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
They had Word set to 90pt times new roman.

Trevor555

5,423 posts

113 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
91mph in a 30 and only a six month ban?

Anyone else thinks that's lenient?

dxg

10,732 posts

289 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
Don't forget the overtaking on a zebra crossing...

whytheory

757 posts

175 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
Had a M140i in my head before I even clicked the link.

Sentence does seem lenient but then I'm also surprised they were able to convict him from this evidence.

StanleyT

1,994 posts

108 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
But if the cyclist was cycling really fast backwards and then replayed the tape in reverse to re-record it forwards, would that have distorted the dS/dT?

(Try it you can get the car undertaking the cyclist in reverse on a couple of the free image / video editors!!!).

Though I presume somewhere there was secondary collaboration such as house CCTV, we got asked for ours a few months ago when a vehicle over the limit for a nearby bridge was alleged to have gone down our road. (Had to fess to coppers ours was just a cheap camera and light box thus no evidence). Five months later - the neighbour showed us their video from a CCTV we'd never even noticed thy had of the Debbie SlowFart lorry reversing which would have exonerated it as obvs he didn't go over the bridge! (Presume Tacho did anyway).

Durzel

12,999 posts

197 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No idea. Probably stupidly thought that if they couldn’t prove the speed then they couldn’t get him for any excess. If he had any brains he wouldn’t have wanted that video played in court.

FWIW

3,926 posts

126 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
Trevor555 said:
91mph in a 30 and only a six month ban?

Anyone else thinks that's lenient?
Exactly what I thought. Small fine too.

Pica-Pica

16,582 posts

113 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
dxg said:
Don't forget the overtaking on a zebra crossing...
Pelican crossing.

cerb4.5lee

44,586 posts

209 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
FWIW said:
Trevor555 said:
91mph in a 30 and only a six month ban?

Anyone else thinks that's lenient?
Exactly what I thought. Small fine too.
My brother in law was banned for doing 84 in a 30(I was sat next to him at the time), and he got a 1 year ban/£600 fine and he was also required to do an extended retest. That was a long time ago as well...so I also agree that this seems lenient.

TCX

1,976 posts

84 months

Wednesday 18th December 2019
quotequote all
Loss of licence for years not months,drivings a privilege not a right,make life hard for fools like this ,plead not guilty so he rolled the dice,should reflect that in sentencing

zarjaz1991

6,806 posts

152 months

Thursday 19th December 2019
quotequote all
A 40 page report? Bet that cost a pretty packet.

I don't condone the behaviour at all, but what a shame we can't spend that much time, money and effort to solve house burglaries.

dxg

10,732 posts

289 months

Thursday 19th December 2019
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
dxg said:
Don't forget the overtaking on a zebra crossing...
Pelican crossing.
"Place where overtaking is not permitted" crossing

handbraketurn

1,397 posts

195 months

Thursday 19th December 2019
quotequote all
What an absolute c*ck-end.

Empty country lane, good visibility, good road conditions, by all means have a "spirited" drive, but built up areas, cyclists or pedestrians around, just reckless and selfish.

Although, in general this news just shows that as the smart city revolution takes hold, and more and more devices have sensors and cameras, it won't be long before spirited drives might be a thing of the past.

Someone mentioned to me recently that eventually they want to have little cameras in all the cats eyes, so you'd be constantly surveilled on all roads.


anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 19th December 2019
quotequote all
dxg said:
Pica-Pica said:
dxg said:
Don't forget the overtaking on a zebra crossing...
Pelican crossing.
"Place where overtaking is not permitted" crossing
Isn't overtaking cyclists exempt from that rule?

Roger Irrelevant

3,389 posts

142 months

Thursday 19th December 2019
quotequote all
Standards are slipping on PH - 20 replies and nobody's said it's OK because he's just a fellow motoring enthusiast having a spirited drive like we all do, how nobody got hurt so that makes it OK too, how the footage could have been doctored so he shouldn't have been found guilty and there's been no mention of snitches getting stitches, East Germany or 1984. In short where are the usual nutters?