Driving in a bus lane
Author
Discussion

Mojooo

Original Poster:

13,291 posts

209 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
I have driven into Reading 3 times recently and found the roads to noticeably poorly laid out. Found it more difficult driving there with no traffic than parts of central London.

I managed to get a ticket for driving on a bus gate on my last visit and I am thinking of appealing.

What do you think?

It was 8pm a couple of weeks ago so at night/dark.

The bus gate is at the end of Beresford Road on the mini roundabout

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Beresford+Rd,+...

If you take a Streetview from the other end of Beresford Road you will see its a normal road.

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4562854,-0.99284...

As you get to the end you are faced with this:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4583786,-0.99190...

A 'bus gate' - I have never seen a bus gate before and I am struggling to work out what the fk its for as it does nothing to add to the roundabout.

Here is a close up
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.4586374,-0.99159...


So as I was driving down this road and all of a sudden the left lane becomes really narrow. I was not familiar with the area and I initially thought the left lane became a bike lane or something as it would be tight to get through. I ended up on the bus gate as it seemed more natural to drive into the bigger lane - having no reason to think it would be anything other than a normal lane. I know the bus signs are there but bear in mind I was a bit taken aback by my lane suddenly splitting in two and apparently only having 1 way through. I did actually stop and pause on the bus gate for a few seconds but couldn't see what else to do, I ended up driving through the bus gate and turning left.

Wouldn't it be helpful if it said BUS LANE a bit before or something? It seems to me that the road is set up to make people fail.

I can see from Google maps now that cars can drive through the left lane but its tight.

I am confused by what the bus gate is achieving as all other sides of the roundabout are standard.

Reading Council have a video but its not viewable at the moment.

None of the appeal options allow me to appeal on 'badly designed road' basis!

Worth appealing or not?

ssray

1,351 posts

254 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
Not

NGee

2,935 posts

193 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
There are quite a few of them in Reading, been there for years.
The road has a 2M width restriction on it (the sign can be seen just before you get to the 'gate').
This means wider vehicles are not allowed down the road.
The 'narrow' bit of the road is basically a physical width barrier, but buses are allowed through their 'gate'.

Of course if an oversize vehicle finds themselves here they just go through the gate!
The camera is set up to photo any vehicle using the gate - far easier than measuring the width of every vehicle using the road!

The width restriction and bus lane are both clearly marked so, no, not worth trying to appeal - many have tried and failed!!

silverfoxcc

8,405 posts

174 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
OP

Get onto Pepipoocon and the Council thread. Put up a thread about this and the chaps will have a look at it .It could be that there might be the poosibility of 'procedural impropriety' in how they have worded it. Normally a win at appeal, but let the chaps see it, and they will give you sound advice.on how to proceed
One thing if there is a chance of an appeal do exactly as they say, do not go out on a tangent thinking it might be a better way, in effect if they say jump just ask how high,

SmoothCriminal

5,939 posts

228 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
Road is set up to make people fail if they don't know how to drive.

Clear width restriction.

Clear bus only signs.

Clear bus gate on the floor.

But always some body else's fault

Lonely

1,099 posts

197 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
NGee said:
There are quite a few of them in Reading, been there for years.
The road has a 2M width restriction on it (the sign can be seen just before you get to the 'gate').
This means wider vehicles are not allowed down the road.
The 'narrow' bit of the road is basically a physical width barrier, but buses are allowed through their 'gate'.

Of course if an oversize vehicle finds themselves here they just go through the gate!
The camera is set up to photo any vehicle using the gate - far easier than measuring the width of every vehicle using the road!

The width restriction and bus lane are both clearly marked so, no, not worth trying to appeal - many have tried and failed!!
As someone else who has never heard of a bus gate, can you please explain where vehicles wider than 2m are supposed to go from this point? The sign you mention is after any possible escape route. Do they get fined for using the bus gate too?

Lonely

1,099 posts

197 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all

vonhosen

40,597 posts

246 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
Lonely said:
NGee said:
There are quite a few of them in Reading, been there for years.
The road has a 2M width restriction on it (the sign can be seen just before you get to the 'gate').
This means wider vehicles are not allowed down the road.
The 'narrow' bit of the road is basically a physical width barrier, but buses are allowed through their 'gate'.

Of course if an oversize vehicle finds themselves here they just go through the gate!
The camera is set up to photo any vehicle using the gate - far easier than measuring the width of every vehicle using the road!

The width restriction and bus lane are both clearly marked so, no, not worth trying to appeal - many have tried and failed!!
As someone else who has never heard of a bus gate, can you please explain where vehicles wider than 2m are supposed to go from this point? The sign you mention is after any possible escape route. Do they get fined for using the bus gate too?
They were warned about the impending width restriction before they entered the road, that width restriction sign isn't the first sign.

Lonely

1,099 posts

197 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
They were warned about the impending width restriction before they entered the road, that width restriction sign isn't the first sign.
I know it's only Google maps but I had a look and couldn't see any.

vonhosen

40,597 posts

246 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
Lonely said:
vonhosen said:
They were warned about the impending width restriction before they entered the road, that width restriction sign isn't the first sign.
I know it's only Google maps but I had a look and couldn't see any.
Back on Oxford Road (from both approach directions) before you turn into Beresford Road.

Lonely

1,099 posts

197 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
Back on Oxford Road (from both approach directions) before you turn into Beresford Road.
Thanks!

Might be still worth OP having a look at the link I posted to see if it's still relevant.

NGee

2,935 posts

193 months

Friday 20th November 2020
quotequote all
Lonely said:
As someone else who has never heard of a bus gate, can you please explain where vehicles wider than 2m are supposed to go from this point? The sign you mention is after any possible escape route. Do they get fined for using the bus gate too?
Yes.

The whole of that area has a 2M width restriction, it is not possible to get to the sign mentioned without going passed an earlier width restriction sign.


Mojooo

Original Poster:

13,291 posts

209 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
Lonely said:
I've seen that - same crossing mentioned

Its just wether its worth the hassle spending hours reading stuff online to argue the toss for £30.

I've made mistakes in the past which I have taken on the chin - but this is taking the piss I feel. You can take about signage metres away all you want but IMO it would be helpful if the lane for the bus gate started sooner.

what confused me was the very sharp way the normal lane narrows.

maybe unsurprisingly, i didn't know about the 2m width sign as a car driver i have never needed to process those signs.

Edited by Mojooo on Saturday 21st November 04:32

drmike37

624 posts

85 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
Bus gates are designed to catch people out and earn fines.

Try going to Nottingham. That'll be expensive until you get used it.

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

289 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
^ I avoid the place like the plague.

Pica-Pica

16,571 posts

113 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
drmike37 said:
Bus gates are designed to catch people out and earn fines.

Try going to Nottingham. That'll be expensive until you get used it.
.. and even then they will change it the next month.

Lonely

1,099 posts

197 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
I've seen that - same crossing mentioned

Its just wether its worth the hassle spending hours reading stuff online to argue the toss for £30.

I've made mistakes in the past which I have taken on the chin - but this is taking the piss I feel. You can take about signage metres away all you want but IMO it would be helpful if the lane for the bus gate started sooner.

what confused me was the very sharp way the normal lane narrows.

maybe unsurprisingly, i didn't know about the 2m width sign as a car driver i have never needed to process those signs.

Edited by Mojooo on Saturday 21st November 04:32
Only you can answer that bit. At the end of the day you know you broke a local rule, however (as written on the other forum) it boils down to this rule being justified in the first place. If all the circumstances are the same then you should have no problem appealing the ticket.

I honestly cannot see any benefit to the gate anyway. It's not as if any buses using it would have their journey shortened as the road simply isn't wide enough to let them past any stationary traffic. Others on here may know different of course and I am willing to accept any opposing views.

EXMX5

39 posts

107 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
That bus gate/width restriction has been there for over 30 years! My driving instructor used to use that as part of her route 27years ago.
It is there to stop large vehicles using a narrow residential rat run to get to the Portman road industrial estate. These days people struggle to pass incoming cars down the road. There are plenty of easier ways to get to the other side in a large vehicle.
Assuming the OP was in a car he should just pay up the £30 fine for not being able to drive through, or recognise, a width restriction! laugh

outnumbered

4,874 posts

263 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
The gate is there to allow buses, but not other large vehicles, from using a narrow residential cut-through.

If the council weren't a complete bunch of tossers, they'd only be fining people who went through the gate in a vehicle that otherwise would not fit down the narrow car lanes.

I've previously scraped an alloy on that corner, and have sometimes used that bus gate myself to avoid doing so again, it's good to know there's a camera there now frownfrown


NGee

2,935 posts

193 months

Saturday 21st November 2020
quotequote all
Lonely said:
Only you can answer that bit. At the end of the day you know you broke a local rule, however (as written on the other forum) it boils down to this rule being justified in the first place. If all the circumstances are the same then you should have no problem appealing the ticket.

I honestly cannot see any benefit to the gate anyway. It's not as if any buses using it would have their journey shortened as the road simply isn't wide enough to let them past any stationary traffic. Others on here may know different of course and I am willing to accept any opposing views.
The 'gate' is not there for the benefit of buses, it is there to enforce the 2M width restriction [except buses] that is in place in all that area.

If you look at Google Street View a couple of years ago, it used to be a 'No Entry' sign with 'Except Buses' tacked on the bottom. No idea why it was changed as they both seem to be the same to me, and I think the original idea was clearer.