New vehicle dispute , any advice please?
Discussion
I bought with a large deposit plus bank loan a new Ranger from my local Ford dealer £38,411 inc vat and signed for it when it was delivered, it had 20 miles on the clock , within the hour I noticed the side step was loose, the paintwork no where near as good as my last Ranger in the same colour which I still have as a comparison,
on closer inspection I noticed one rear door was a slightly different shade and the other side front door had an outward protruding crease in the laquer,
I asked a sprayer his opinion and he said the paint had been done both sides and noticed the door seals not pushed fully home, he also reckoned the doors had been removed by the damage to hinge bolts,
I contacted the dealer who drove the van back for their spray shop to comment, they said the paint is within Fords tolerances, I said it did not leave Fords in that condition and it's a brand new van and should be in brand new condition, this van is in far worse condition than the old one I am returning to the lease company,
I had a call today stating it's my van as I bought it and I am the owner on the log book ,I told them they can keep it and find a less fussy buyer, anyone here know if I legally have to be stuck with this repaired vehicle or do I have the right for refusal?
thanks.
on closer inspection I noticed one rear door was a slightly different shade and the other side front door had an outward protruding crease in the laquer,
I asked a sprayer his opinion and he said the paint had been done both sides and noticed the door seals not pushed fully home, he also reckoned the doors had been removed by the damage to hinge bolts,
I contacted the dealer who drove the van back for their spray shop to comment, they said the paint is within Fords tolerances, I said it did not leave Fords in that condition and it's a brand new van and should be in brand new condition, this van is in far worse condition than the old one I am returning to the lease company,
I had a call today stating it's my van as I bought it and I am the owner on the log book ,I told them they can keep it and find a less fussy buyer, anyone here know if I legally have to be stuck with this repaired vehicle or do I have the right for refusal?
thanks.
I would be sending it back and getting a refund as it is not in a new condition and get a written report on it from the guy you took it to for advice .
I would also be complaining to the CEO of the ford dealers that sold it to you .
I hope you have lots of photos to show the damage .
Consult a solicitor and consumer advice company for how to proceed.
I would also be complaining to the CEO of the ford dealers that sold it to you .
I hope you have lots of photos to show the damage .
Consult a solicitor and consumer advice company for how to proceed.
grumpy52 said:
Do I remember that they introduced a rule that vehicles that had repairs before being sold ,could not be declared as a new vehicle. Or have I remembered it wrong .
I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
Are you connected to the internet? Do you have a search engine on your device?I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
Loads of new vehicles get paint rectification before they get to the dealership, and loads get paint rectification between dealership and buyer. It doesn't mean it's not a new vehicle or that there's grounds to reject it, but the work should be done well and you the non-expert buyer shouldn't be able to tell it's been repainted.
Tell them to return it to the condition they'd want it to be in if it was in their showroom and if they do that, IMO you will struggle to get traction with rejecting it. If they refuse to do that, I don't know - I imagine you'd at least need an expert to state it wasn't to expected new car standards. But how you'd get them to take it back, quickly and without you having to pay instalments or have your deposit tied up for months while it was settled, I'm afraid I don't know.
Given the above, requesting that they please redo their shoddy repair so it meets a reasonable standard might be better than getting embroiled in a long expensive fight with them.
Tell them to return it to the condition they'd want it to be in if it was in their showroom and if they do that, IMO you will struggle to get traction with rejecting it. If they refuse to do that, I don't know - I imagine you'd at least need an expert to state it wasn't to expected new car standards. But how you'd get them to take it back, quickly and without you having to pay instalments or have your deposit tied up for months while it was settled, I'm afraid I don't know.
Given the above, requesting that they please redo their shoddy repair so it meets a reasonable standard might be better than getting embroiled in a long expensive fight with them.
grumpy52 said:
Do I remember that they introduced a rule that vehicles that had repairs before being sold ,could not be declared as a new vehicle. Or have I remembered it wrong .
I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
They can have panels replaced and repaired and be sold as new, they can't have structural panels repaired and be sold as new eg roof..I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
Lots of cars come of the ships with damage, they get repaired as part of the new car PDI then sent to dealer / end user.
My current car had a new drivers door fitted due to damage incurred in transit.
You would be surprised at the amount of new cars that are damaged in transit.
jonwm said:
grumpy52 said:
Do I remember that they introduced a rule that vehicles that had repairs before being sold ,could not be declared as a new vehicle. Or have I remembered it wrong .
I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
They can have panels replaced and repaired and be sold as new, they can't have structural panels repaired and be sold as new eg roof..I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
Lots of cars come of the ships with damage, they get repaired as part of the new car PDI then sent to dealer / end user.
My current car had a new drivers door fitted due to damage incurred in transit.
You would be surprised at the amount of new cars that are damaged in transit.
From memory something like 60% of cars were delivered via the bodyshop.
Did you use a credit card for the deposit or was it cash and a personal bank loan?
As you paid VAT I'm assuming you are a consumer (not a business) - the consumer credit act allows for rejection within 30 days - if you paid with any type of credit then the dealer and the credit company are jointly liable (and I've had much more success dealing with finance/credit companies than the dealer)
As you paid VAT I'm assuming you are a consumer (not a business) - the consumer credit act allows for rejection within 30 days - if you paid with any type of credit then the dealer and the credit company are jointly liable (and I've had much more success dealing with finance/credit companies than the dealer)
Edited by lard on Saturday 25th September 02:42
As the lease had a month to run on my old Ranger I left the new van at the dealers and arranged for it to be delivered a day before the collection of the old one, this is how I noticed the paintwork issues when one was parked in front of the other, the lease van is in better condition than my new one,
we paid bank transfer for the deposit and hire purchase via Lloyds for the balance, think I am screwed and will tell them I want the van repainted to my satisfaction and will have to just live with it
we paid bank transfer for the deposit and hire purchase via Lloyds for the balance, think I am screwed and will tell them I want the van repainted to my satisfaction and will have to just live with it
jonwm said:
grumpy52 said:
Do I remember that they introduced a rule that vehicles that had repairs before being sold ,could not be declared as a new vehicle. Or have I remembered it wrong .
I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
They can have panels replaced and repaired and be sold as new, they can't have structural panels repaired and be sold as new eg roof..I think it was introduced 20 odd years ago .
Lots of cars come of the ships with damage, they get repaired as part of the new car PDI then sent to dealer / end user.
My current car had a new drivers door fitted due to damage incurred in transit.
You would be surprised at the amount of new cars that are damaged in transit.
I also know someone who owns a fairly large body shop (2 locations) and they have a contract with a well known dealer group to repair new cars before delivery.
It's not that long since I was over there and saw a new M5, still with some of the transport protection in place, having a door repaired.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



