insurance procedure
Discussion
can someone help me understand how the car insurance procedure works when there is an accident
my situation at the moment is, ive had an accident
both me and the third party deny liabilty
so what happens now?
as far as i know there are no witnesses and no cctv
how do they determine the person at fault
my situation at the moment is, ive had an accident
both me and the third party deny liabilty
so what happens now?
as far as i know there are no witnesses and no cctv
how do they determine the person at fault
okenemem said:
can someone help me understand how the car insurance procedure works when there is an accident
my situation at the moment is, ive had an accident
both me and the third party deny liabilty
so what happens now?
as far as i know there are no witnesses and no cctv
how do they determine the person at fault
Contact damage forensic evidence if goes that way, so don't tell any lies, and demand it if other driver is clearly at fault though even then sometimes it gets foggy.my situation at the moment is, ive had an accident
both me and the third party deny liabilty
so what happens now?
as far as i know there are no witnesses and no cctv
how do they determine the person at fault
okenemem said:
Contact damage forensic evidence
can you explain ??
Direction of contact/force, paint comes off in a certain way/direction and metal will show signs of how cars came into contact to help determination, if expensive claim and one insurer wants to really avoid paying out believing they shouldn't.can you explain ??
Not strictly applicable in all accidents though, like backing into someone.
Edited by NFT on Friday 15th July 22:31
okenemem said:
interesting
This is normally for high value claims or total demand for it from customer, or where insurer wants to push a dispute and build a strong evidence package, some accidents can't really go that way, like slow speed bumper to pumper, claim of what occurred will be a big factor but other PHs will likely explain normal scenarios or want to hear it to give a more accurate reply.BertBert said:
But not I feel all that reliable as a source
You are correct. A lot of times it won't be too helpful.More a tool in the bag for certain circumstances, if someone coming towards was over line etc. and took your mirror off and scraped wing, its of little use, some scenarios will use the Contact evidence to discredit a story, but the scenario has to allow it.
NFT said:
Sebring440 said:
Ignore any post from NFT — it's a bot that uses AI to string together words and phrases that purport to relate to the discussion but just come through as being ridiculous and incomprehensible.
The "I" in the "AI" is not very well developed.
interesting..The "I" in the "AI" is not very well developed.
NFT said:
Sebring440 said:
Ignore any post from NFT — it's a bot that uses AI to string together words and phrases that purport to relate to the discussion but just come through as being ridiculous and incomprehensible.
The "I" in the "AI" is not very well developed.
interesting..The "I" in the "AI" is not very well developed.
They are obviously using PH as a test bed for the AI.
Perhaps it because it represents a cross-section of society in the UK. Presumably the algorithm "learns" from the replys to the bot's responses.
I'm struggling as to why PH allows this sort of thing?
very good advice Sebring440 said:
See what I mean?
They are obviously using PH as a test bed for the AI.
Perhaps it because it represents a cross-section of society in the UK. Presumably the algorithm "learns" from the replys to the bot's responses.
I'm struggling as to why PH allows this sort of thing?
Congratulations, you just ruined the next Alexa upgrade.They are obviously using PH as a test bed for the AI.
Perhaps it because it represents a cross-section of society in the UK. Presumably the algorithm "learns" from the replys to the bot's responses.
I'm struggling as to why PH allows this sort of thing?
Will have to start this all again, mumsnet turned out to always order nappies and piston heads it turned into an A hole of a powerfully built director, complaining about where people park and trying to order cars, wonderful.
Don't know why your struggling, PornHub loved it, it kept buying subscriptions.
I just hope it doesn't order a truck of lube & Dildo's again.
Good day to you Sir.
Smurfsarepeopletoo said:
What happened, If you give a bit of detail, someone might be able to give you a bit of help with it.
so basically , i was on my motorbike heading towards the third partythird party was intending to turn right in to petrol station
so he has stopped and was indicating
there was a car in front of me
i have then overtaken the car in front of me on the right on the white line not on the other side of the road
he has then committed to the turn
as i overtake and return to the center of the lane i hit him
i hit him in the passenger rear quarter on my side of the road.
he claims its my fault, apparently i was going to fast
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff