I know what they meant but…
I know what they meant but…
Author
Discussion

Oceanrower

Original Poster:

1,351 posts

141 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
this has to be the daftest road markings I’ve seen!


ChocolateFrog

34,954 posts

202 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
Why?

Oceanrower

Original Poster:

1,351 posts

141 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
Normally for a low bridge there’ll be dotted lines either side showing the highest part. This look like it’s encouraging you to change to the opposite carriageway.

kgkev

27 posts

130 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
the Streetview doesn't give the amount of visibility justice, it's a very quiet bit of road with all through traffic on the bypass.

I assume its best to guide high vehicles onto the wrong carriage rather than let them guess and risk a collision.
even so, someone has clear gone too far over and clipped the other side


Street View

If the road was any busier, or visibility limited I am sure they would put traffic signals in

Canon_Fodder

1,775 posts

92 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
They obv want vehicles to go under the bridge in its middle (most clearance) but it seems a rather odd way of marking the road to encourage that as this way people may drive through at an angle which is not optimal

Better IMV to have a single dotted 'lane' going straight under the bridge in the middle of the road.

BertBert

21,235 posts

240 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
It looks like the bridge isn't perpendicular to the road which is why the markings go from one side to the other following the highest part of the bridge.

RB Will

10,830 posts

269 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
BertBert said:
It looks like the bridge isn't perpendicular to the road which is why the markings go from one side to the other following the highest part of the bridge.
This

Canon_Fodder

1,775 posts

92 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
Ah ok - makes sense

speedking31

3,913 posts

165 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
Might be interesting with Lane Keep Assist (LKAS) turned on. Or in an autonomous vehicle.

DodgyGeezer

48,957 posts

219 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
presumably to help tall vehicles make the (fairly) sharp left hander just past the bridge...

jondude

2,441 posts

246 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
It might be a deliberate attempt to confuse slightly so everyone slows down. Those lanes look barely wide enough for a motorbike and the sharp left turn ahead rather dangerous.

Am reminded when I took a friend from the US out for a drive on such roads and he seriously asked why I was driving on cycle paths. When he saw an oncoming car come at us, he nearly had a heart attack.

playamonte

92 posts

58 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
Those dotted lines show the route for high vehicles & you can see in the picture that the tube (as that is what it is) is offset
So if I were driving a tall vehicle through there I would follow the indicated route and not simple stay in the middle of the road.

GranpaB

19,836 posts

65 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
Might be interesting with Lane Keep Assist (LKAS) turned on. Or in an autonomous vehicle.
I don't think any lane assist systems work below 40mph or some such?

e-honda

9,548 posts

175 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
The bridge is at an angle so the middle of it follows that path, but I think they could have lost 1 or 2 dashes at either end to make it look less like it was directing you to change to the other side of the road.

Glosphil

4,877 posts

263 months

Monday 25th July 2022
quotequote all
Perhaps ensuring the rear of a high & long vehicle clears the bridge before returning to the normal side of the oad.