legally where would you stand?
Discussion
I have a similar situation locally, going from a 20mph into a 50mph (as it used to be) they have changed the 50mph into a 30mph but the 50mph is still painted on the on the road, then 100yds later there is a 50mph red repeater (within the new 30 zone) 100 yds further on you enter the new starting point of the 50 mph zone.
They have squished in a 30mph in between the 20mph and 50mph for some unknown reason but left the 50mph repeaters and the 50mph painted on the road, it's utterly bizarre and yet another example of waste.
The lower limits shown in the photographs would not likely be enforceable as the motorist was not given "adequate guidance."
If he drove further into the reduced limit and there were repeater signs or the driver was on a restricted road then that would be a more difficult case to argue.
If he drove further into the reduced limit and there were repeater signs or the driver was on a restricted road then that would be a more difficult case to argue.
E63eeeeee... said:
Pretty sure it's the signs that count in the top one, the road marking is a reminder rather than anything statutory.
Iirc the same is true of the little signs in the second picture, the limit will have been set by the last pair of full size signs.
Limits painted on the road are enforceable in the New Forest i seem to remember.Iirc the same is true of the little signs in the second picture, the limit will have been set by the last pair of full size signs.
Edited by GranpaB on Sunday 30th October 15:06
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


