Insurance in my name with son/daughter as RK

Insurance in my name with son/daughter as RK

Author
Discussion

Sheepshanks

Original Poster:

36,951 posts

133 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Daughter is getting an EV and we want to hang on to her old car for a while in case of any initial issues.

She lives a couple of miles away and doesn't have space for another car so I thought I'd insure it and keep it here, but don't want to change from her as RK as the car has another year to run of a warranty / assistance package. She's also had the car from new and it seems a shame to add another RK.

Both her and us use LV= for insurance but they have refused to allow me to be policyholder on the car if she's RK. They'll insure with her as policyholder and the car kept here, but the premium is bonkers. She also doesn't have any spare NCD, whereas I do.

Short of changing the RK to me, has anyone had success in getting cover where their son/daughter is RK?



alscar

6,232 posts

227 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Probably a relatively unusual scenario but not unique.
Either LV don’t want the business or suspect there may be some form of fronting although can’t see how given your inf.
Maybe try a broker like Howdens ( previously A Plan ) and let them do the work.

MOMACC

494 posts

51 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
The basic principles of insurance are formed around insurable interest, you don't have any in this scenario.

The option is there for your daughter to insure the motor noting it's overnight post code being your address you just don't like the cost.

Sheepshanks

Original Poster:

36,951 posts

133 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
MOMACC said:
The basic principles of insurance are formed around insurable interest, you don't have any in this scenario.
Yes I do - I own the car.

Dingu

4,885 posts

44 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
You’ll have to try a different company

davek_964

10,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
MOMACC said:
The basic principles of insurance are formed around insurable interest, you don't have any in this scenario.
Yes I do - I own the car.
Although you've explained why you don't want to do it - if you own the car, and it's going to be kept at your address - how are you not going to be the registered keeper?

Strudul

1,599 posts

99 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
I've had a car with the owner and RK different through Admiral before, but why not just stick the details into a comparison site?

Simon_GH

704 posts

94 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Can you insure in her name and say she leaves the car at yours? Might be easier.

BertBert

20,295 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
Although you've explained why you don't want to do it - if you own the car, and it's going to be kept at your address - how are you not going to be the registered keeper?
Why does the OP need to be the RK?

davek_964

10,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
BertBert said:
davek_964 said:
Although you've explained why you don't want to do it - if you own the car, and it's going to be kept at your address - how are you not going to be the registered keeper?
Why does the OP need to be the RK?
He owns the car, and it will be at his address. Why wouldn't he be?

He may want to avoid it because of warranty etc - but from the insurer point of view (who couldn't care less about that) - I'm not surprised that they find it odd that the owner, who keeps the car at their address - won't be the Registered Keeper.

Dingu

4,885 posts

44 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Generally a different RK isn’t a massive issue. More often than not this situation would be someone trying to front so I see why they may decide they don’t want the business.

Rusty Old-Banger

5,690 posts

227 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
BertBert said:
davek_964 said:
Although you've explained why you don't want to do it - if you own the car, and it's going to be kept at your address - how are you not going to be the registered keeper?
Why does the OP need to be the RK?
He owns the car, and it will be at his address. Why wouldn't he be?

He may want to avoid it because of warranty etc - but from the insurer point of view (who couldn't care less about that) - I'm not surprised that they find it odd that the owner, who keeps the car at their address - won't be the Registered Keeper.
Does he own the car? It remains the daughters car surely? If anything, OP is the RK as he is keeping it at his house.

So either +1 to the number of RKs on the logbook, or find a better insurer, or just pay up?

davek_964

10,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Rusty Old-Banger said:
davek_964 said:
BertBert said:
davek_964 said:
Although you've explained why you don't want to do it - if you own the car, and it's going to be kept at your address - how are you not going to be the registered keeper?
Why does the OP need to be the RK?
He owns the car, and it will be at his address. Why wouldn't he be?

He may want to avoid it because of warranty etc - but from the insurer point of view (who couldn't care less about that) - I'm not surprised that they find it odd that the owner, who keeps the car at their address - won't be the Registered Keeper.
Does he own the car? It remains the daughters car surely? If anything, OP is the RK as he is keeping it at his house.

So either +1 to the number of RKs on the logbook, or find a better insurer, or just pay up?
In my original answer, I quoted this :

Sheepshanks said:
MOMACC said:
The basic principles of insurance are formed around insurable interest, you don't have any in this scenario.
Yes I do - I own the car.

BertBert

20,295 posts

225 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
He owns the car, and it will be at his address. Why wouldn't he be?
Because he doesn't want to be. You said he [b]had[/]b to be, but I don't think he does.

Sheepshanks

Original Poster:

36,951 posts

133 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
alscar said:
Probably a relatively unusual scenario but not unique.
Either LV don’t want the business or suspect there may be some form of fronting although can’t see how given your inf.
Maybe try a broker like Howdens ( previously A Plan ) and let them do the work.
Thanks for the suggestion - I tried them and they seemed amazed by LV's stance. We've had much of our insurance with LV for years and they've had to "check with the underwriters" on a couple of things in the past and it's always been fine, but I guess the new regime there (they're now Allianz) is less flexible.

Anyway, Howdens quoted £638.

In comparison, LV are OK for daughter to have both cars in her name, with the old car kept at our house, and will do that for £502. That does also have an upside of making her new EV insurance a little cheaper too as she'd have a multicar policy.

If I change the RK to me, LV will insure for £263 (still with daughter named, with Class 1 biz use for her). Think I'll just have to suck it up and change the RK.


davek_964

10,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
BertBert said:
davek_964 said:
He owns the car, and it will be at his address. Why wouldn't he be?
Because he doesn't want to be. You said he [b]had[/]b to be, but I don't think he does.
I didn't really say that - I suspect you believe I meant / thought that you have to be the registered keeper to insure a vehicle - which I know is not the case.

I was simply questioning how - as the owner of a car he was keeping at his address - he could logically claim not to be the registered keeper, and hence why the insurers might question it.

alscar

6,232 posts

227 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
alscar said:
Probably a relatively unusual scenario but not unique.
Either LV don’t want the business or suspect there may be some form of fronting although can’t see how given your inf.
Maybe try a broker like Howdens ( previously A Plan ) and let them do the work.
Thanks for the suggestion - I tried them and they seemed amazed by LV's stance. We've had much of our insurance with LV for years and they've had to "check with the underwriters" on a couple of things in the past and it's always been fine, but I guess the new regime there (they're now Allianz) is less flexible.

Anyway, Howdens quoted £638.

In comparison, LV are OK for daughter to have both cars in her name, with the old car kept at our house, and will do that for £502. That does also have an upside of making her new EV insurance a little cheaper too as she'd have a multicar policy.

If I change the RK to me, LV will insure for £263 (still with daughter named, with Class 1 biz use for her). Think I'll just have to suck it up and change the RK.
£263 v £638 is indeed a big difference ( I assume you also considered getting the “ temporary old car “ a limited mileage to reduce the premium ?) and might also be worth considering that if the EV is more reliable than you are expecting then selling the old car and getting a refund on insurance might also be a reason to avoid changing the RK ?

Sheepshanks

Original Poster:

36,951 posts

133 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
alscar said:
£263 v £638 is indeed a big difference ( I assume you also considered getting the “ temporary old car “ a limited mileage to reduce the premium ?) and might also be worth considering that if the EV is more reliable than you are expecting then selling the old car and getting a refund on insurance might also be a reason to avoid changing the RK ?
Yes, set the mileage low on the old car.

That's exactly the plan - see us through winter then sell the old car. The EV might be fine, but she's in a fairly rural area, lives on her own, and will be a bit stuffed if she gets up one morning and the charger has glitched and there wasn't much charge in the car the night before. As long as she could get to us - we're 3 miles towards work, she could just pick up her old car.

I also dumped my (mainly) work car during Covid and never replaced it. We're now both retired but occasionally it's a nuisance not having a second car, although my wife will only ever drive anywhere if she absolutely has to.


alscar

6,232 posts

227 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
Yes, set the mileage low on the old car.

That's exactly the plan - see us through winter then sell the old car. The EV might be fine, but she's in a fairly rural area, lives on her own, and will be a bit stuffed if she gets up one morning and the charger has glitched and there wasn't much charge in the car the night before. As long as she could get to us - we're 3 miles towards work, she could just pick up her old car.

I also dumped my (mainly) work car during Covid and never replaced it. We're now both retired but occasionally it's a nuisance not having a second car, although my wife will only ever drive anywhere if she absolutely has to.
In which case I think biting the bullet and taking the lower premium whilst changing the RK is probably the the answer. Value wise I doubt it will make too much difference on the sale of the old car.
I would still drive the old car occasionally though !


119

11,405 posts

50 months

Wednesday 4th December 2024
quotequote all
LV (Allianz) are in the process of a massive rebrand as their time as LV is nearly over.

Meaning, they are shedding ‘complicated’ policies and keeping it simple.

Mind you, even when it actually was LV, they were quite fussy who they insured.